by Rick Scarborough
"They were stolen from their homes, locked in chains and taken across an ocean. And for more than 200 years, their blood and sweat would help to build the richest and most powerful nation the world has ever known.
But when slavery ended, their welcome was over. America's wealthy elite had decided it was time for them to disappear and they were not particular about how it might be done." www.maafa21.com
Two abhorrent, rampant and subtle forms of mass population reduction and control have emerged since the end of slavery as the world knew it, but they are no less evil and have the same complete disregard for the human beings that make up the races and groups that they want to see destroyed. It's tragic and heartbreaking and we must pay attention to how it is being subtly perpetrated into the fabric of our society.
The United Nations includes in its definition of genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy...imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; forcibly transferring children of the group to another group." See Article 2 of the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG).
Eugenics is a science which basically treats human beings like cattle or horses. It is the quest of searching for a higher breed. Adolph Hitler advanced with a vengeance his belief that the Aryan race was the "superior breed" of humanity. In just one generation this demonic philosophy is again raising its head and being embraced by elitists in this country and around the world. You and I have an obligation to do all we can to confront it and stop it.
Eugenicists advocate and practice "interventions" which basically identify and classify individuals and their families into groups of poor, mentally ill, blind, promiscuous women, homosexuals, and of course entire racial groups. They then group these people as "degenerate" or "unfit," following through with obviously degrading desegregation, institutionalization, sterilization, euthanasia and even mass extermination, as was the horrid case in Nazi Germany.
I say all of that not to give you a lesson of the tragedies that live within our history books but to give you vital information of what is happening right now, albeit much less noticeably due to the complicity of members of the press and their failure to report on it. This is actually a belief system that is being perpetrated by leaders of our nation who have much influence and little conscience. If you have trouble believing this go to www.maafa21.com and view the video clip. Be prepared to be disturbed.
In the early 20th century, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was an admirer of Adolph Hitler and a proponent of "race hygiene" through "negative eugenics." She made it clear that she had no problem reducing the fertility of "dysgenic" groups. In 1921, she went so far as to say that eugenics is "the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems, and the ever increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all." She also cautioned, "We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population."
Hillary Clinton stated admiringly that Ms. Sanger has "ushered in demographic and social changes that have brought us closer to gender equality than at any time." This was motivated by the sexual revolution brought on in part by Ms. Sanger's intense promotion of both abortion and other contraceptives.
During a bold speech in Congress by Representative Chris Smith on March 31, he called Ms. Sanger a racist eugenicist. In response to Mrs. Clinton, Smith said, "Are you kidding? In 'awe' of Margaret Sanger, who said in 1921, 'Eugenics ... is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political, and social problems'. And who also said in 1922, 'The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it'?"
UCLA's pro-life student magazine, The Advocate, allegedly has proof that Planned Parenthood accepted a financial donation that was used exclusively to target the abortion of an unborn black baby for strictly racist motives.
According to a book written by Columbia University historian Matthew Connelly called Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Congrol World Population, in 1952, John D. Rockefeller held an invitation-only secret gathering in Williamsburg, VA which came to be known as the Conference on Population Problems that would ultimately set the agenda for the following decades. Verbatim transcripts from this conference showed that the motivating questions concerned how many people the world would hold, along with other decisions such as whether or not poor countries like India should be excluded from the benefits of industrial development. There they arrogantly decided that radical measures would be necessary in order to "save Western Civilization from being dragged down by the growing humanitarian demands of Third World countries."
From that came the Population Council, which oversaw the entire population control movement. It went on to work with the United Nations, the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations and then, just three weeks later, the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) was founded by Margaret Sanger. See the pattern? Nothing happens in a vacuum. Satan always has no new ideas, he simply recycles old strategies that have worked in the past. We absolutely must be discerning if we are going to engage ourselves in the spiritual battle taking place for the soul of our nation.
Psychologist C.P. Blacker was selected by Ms. Sanger as its first director general because he believed in a strategy of "crypto-eugenics," saying "you seek to fulfill the aims of eugenics without disclosing what you are really aiming at and without mentioning the word." In other words, don't let the world know what we trying to do but work to accomplish it anyway.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg also seems to be in favor of using abortion to eradicate unwanted populations. In an interview with Emily Bazelon of the New York Times she said, "Frankly, I had thought at the time Roe [v. Wade] was decided there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in the populations that we don't want to have too many of." And who is to decide which populations are the ones "we don't want to have too many of?" Can we discern the answer to this question by observing that most abortion clinics are in predominantly black neighborhoods? God and God alone is the giver and taker of life and He makes no mistakes. To impose ourselves into decisions that He alone has the sovereignty and authority to make is dangerous indeed.
Justice Ginsberg's remarks align with Margaret Sanger's and others in the eugenics movement: "The systematic use of contraception, sterilization and abortion to reduce the numbers of poor, black, immigrant and disabled populations."
When the South Carolina Supreme Court upheld the partial birth abortion ban in 2007, Ginsburg wrote a seething dissent, saying the court's reasoning "reflects ancient notions about a woman's place in the family and under the Constitution - ideas that have long been discredited."
By the way, this year's recipient of the "esteemed" Margaret Sanger Award presented annually by Planned Parenthood was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
by Rick Scarborough