Guns
Guns

Judge orders sheriff to take a class on the 1st Amendment

| by

Recently a US District Judge ordered a local sheriff to issue  a gun permit to an applicant... and, interestingly enough, to take a college level course on the First Amendment.

 

The applicant and his son (who at the time was under the age of majority) were denied gun permits after being vocal members of their community (protesting, writting letters, and passing out leaflets).

“The court finds a tsunami, a maelstrom, an avalanche, of direct, uncontroverted evidence in Sheriff Weber’s own testimony to conclude beyond all doubt that he unquestionably violated the First Amendment rights of at least Paul Dorr,” noted the judge in his ruling.

 

“The court finds a tsunami, a maelstrom, an avalanche, of direct, uncontroverted evidence in Sheriff Weber’s own testimony to conclude beyond all doubt that he unquestionably violated the First Amendment rights of at least Paul Dorr,” Bennett wrote in his ruling. “Giving Sheriff Weber more deference than is due his elected status, the court finds that Sheriff Weber denied Paul’s application for a concealed weapons permit not because of the content of his First Amendment activity but because it was effective and agitated many members of the local community

The sheriff noted “concern from public. Don’t trust him.” in declining the permit claming thta he had heart the applicant refered to as “a whacko, delusional, a nut job, a spook, and narcissist,”

 

 

Further the judge stated, “In denying Paul a concealed weapons permit, Sheriff Weber single-handedly hijacked the First Amendment and nullified its freedoms and protections. Ironically, Sheriff Weber, sworn to uphold the Constitution, in fact retaliated against a citizen of his county who used this important freedom of speech and association precisely in the manner envisioned by the founding members of our nation ...

"In doing so, this popularly elected Sheriff, who appears to be a fine man and an excellent law enforcement officer, in all other regards, blatantly caved in to public pressure and opinion and, in doing so, severely trampled the Constitution and Paul’s First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and association. This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views."

As part of the ruling the sheriff is required to complete a court approved college level course on the US Constitution, including a discussion of the First amendment, and present proof of a passing grade.
From:
http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/news/local/article_b6b931ef-32dd-5743-9e72-2d6f23f4a3a6.html