<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Opposing Views - U.S. a Christian Nation?</title>
    <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/is-the-us-a-christian-nation</link>
    <description>Opposing Views - Is the U.S. a Christian Nation?</description>
    <item>
      <title>A Comment More Than an Objection</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/a-comment-more-than-an-objection</link>
      <description>This is not really an objection, but a comment. As I noted in the first of my arguments (&quot;What Do You Mean By That?&quot;), I do not dispute--nor lament--the historical fact that Christianity has, from the arrival of the first settlers to the present... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:41:23 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/a-comment-more-than-an-objection</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>But Wait, There's More!</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/but-wait-there-s-more</link>
      <description>There is no contradiction between acknowledging that most of the Founding Fathers believed in God and some kind of Providence, may even have been practicing Christians, and asserting that they consciously wrote a secular Constitution and intended... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:37:49 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/but-wait-there-s-more</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We Have Become Ignorant of the Founding Principles of This Nation</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/we-have-become-ignorant-of-the-founding-principles-of-this-nation</link>
      <description>In the introduction to her book, The Rewriting of American History, Catherine Millard, historian and author, writes, “Rewriting a nation’s history is frequently one of the first strategies taken by a conquering nation.&amp;nbsp; Why?&amp;nbsp; Because a... </description>
      <author>Dr. Paul S. Vickery</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:02:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/we-have-become-ignorant-of-the-founding-principles-of-this-nation</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Framers Were Inspired and Motivated by Scripture</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-framers-were-inspired-and-motivated-by-scripture</link>
      <description>I close simply by restating that our nation was founded upon Judeo-Christian principles.&amp;nbsp; The framers and their direct descendants were inspired and motivated by the Scriptures.&amp;nbsp; Our nation would not be what is without these Christian... </description>
      <author>Dr. Paul S. Vickery</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:01:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-framers-were-inspired-and-motivated-by-scripture</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Let’s Look at What Some of the Founders Wrote</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/lets-look-at-what-some-of-the-founders-wrote</link>
      <description>My intention is simply to provoke some discussion and reflection by quoting some of our early heroes and attempt to discern from where they received their inspiration. Although we could probably trade excerpts from writings all day, I believe it... </description>
      <author>Dr. Paul S. Vickery</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:00:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/lets-look-at-what-some-of-the-founders-wrote</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The First Civil Government and Institution of Higher Learning</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-first-civil-government-and-institution-of-higher-learning</link>
      <description>The first civil government in America was the Mayflower Compact (1620).&amp;nbsp; Despite a difficult journey in which nearly half of the original 103 passengers died, they gave thanks to God and agreed to conform their colony to His principles. They... </description>
      <author>Dr. Paul S. Vickery</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:58:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-first-civil-government-and-institution-of-higher-learning</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>There is No Coercion to Follow a Particular Faith</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/there-is-no-coercion-to-follow-a-particular-faith</link>
      <description>As I wrote previously, America was not founded as a Christian nation in the sense that Saudi Arabia and Iran are now Muslim nations where mosque and state are one.&amp;nbsp; There is no coercion to follow a particular faith, and it was simply stated in... </description>
      <author>Dr. Paul S. Vickery</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:48:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/there-is-no-coercion-to-follow-a-particular-faith</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Judaeo-Christian Beliefs Form Basis for Constitution and Legal Code</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/judaeo-christian-beliefs-form-basis-for-constitution-and-legal-code</link>
      <description>America   is a nation built upon Judaeo-Christian beliefs.   These values emphasize the dignity and worth of every person, created in the image and likeness of God, and form the basis for our Constitution and legal code. Those who founded this... </description>
      <author>Dr. Paul S. Vickery</author>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:45:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/judaeo-christian-beliefs-form-basis-for-constitution-and-legal-code</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Any Number Can Play</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/any-number-can-play</link>
      <description>America has been remarkably favored—blessed, if you prefer—by a wise constitutional policy of non-preferential protection for the free and responsible exercise of religion.&amp;nbsp; For the good of the entire community... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:21:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/any-number-can-play</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Wall of Separation Has Protected Both Church and State</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-wall-of-separation-has-protected-both-church-and-state</link>
      <description>We should not underestimate the value of this historic wall of separation and allow it to be dismantled—or bulldozed. It has proven to be the greatest guarantor of religious freedom and tolerance ever devised by human minds. As Justice... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:21:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-wall-of-separation-has-protected-both-church-and-state</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Repeated Attempts to Reverse the Framers' Intention Have Failed</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/repeated-attempts-to-reverse-the-framers-intention-have-failed</link>
      <description>In the following decades, various attempts were made to breach the wall of separation and gain some official recognition and status for Christianity. Isaac Kramnick and Laurence Moore, in their excellent book, The Godless Constitution: The Case... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:21:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/repeated-attempts-to-reverse-the-framers-intention-have-failed</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Father of the Constitution Agreed</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-father-of-the-constitution-agreed</link>
      <description>As president, James Madison, &quot;the Father of the Constitution,&quot; vetoed a bill that would have given government-owned land to a Baptist church in Mississippi, insisting that it violated the First Amendment and would set &quot;a precedent for the... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:21:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-father-of-the-constitution-agreed</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Wall of Separation</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-wall-of-separation</link>
      <description>In 1802, the second year of his presidency, Thomas Jefferson wrote a famous letter to the Danbury (Connecticut) Baptist Association, in which he said, “I contemplate with solemn reverence that act of... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:21:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/the-wall-of-separation</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Early Presidents Regarded the New Nation as a Secular State</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/early-presidents-regarded-the-new-nation-as-a-secular-state</link>
      <description>The Founding Fathers were cosmopolitan intellectuals devoted to the rationalism of the Enlightenment, but they were not, for the most part, humanistic atheists or opposed to religion. On the contrary, they regarded morality as indispensable to a... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:21:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/early-presidents-regarded-the-new-nation-as-a-secular-state</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Public Reaction Was Mixed</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/public-reaction-was-mixed</link>
      <description>That the Constitution was godless and opened the door for non-Christians to serve in government did not go unnoticed. Indeed, it was bitterly attacked for its failure to honor God and to give Christianity a favored place. To abandon the ideal of a... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:21:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/public-reaction-was-mixed</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We the People</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/we-the-people</link>
      <description>With the tide running against religious establishment when the Framers of the Constitution gathered in Philadelphia in 1787, they set out to prove that a nation could exist and flourish without an established religion or religious tests. In keeping... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:21:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/we-the-people</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jefferson, Madison, and the Separation of Church and State</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/jefferson-madison-and-the-separation-of-church-and-state</link>
      <description>At the time of the framing of the Constitution in 1787, Virginia and several other states had rejected all establishment of religion. No state any longer had a European-style establishment of a single denomination, but several retained a form of... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:20:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/jefferson-madison-and-the-separation-of-church-and-state</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Do You Mean By That?</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/what-do-you-mean-by-that</link>
      <description>Before answering this question, it is crucial to know what it means. Several possibilities exist.   WERE THE ORIGINAL SETTLERS CHRISTIANS, AT LEAST NOMINALLY?    Of course they were. Since the colonists were overwhelmingly from Europe, their... </description>
      <author>William Martin, Ph.D.</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:20:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/what-do-you-mean-by-that</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>