<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Opposing Views - Is Spanking Children OK?</title>
    <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/is-spanking-an-acceptable-form-of-discipline</link>
    <description>Opposing Views - Is Spanking an Acceptable Form of Discipline? </description>
    <item>
      <title>Are You Actually Scared That We'll Become Communists?</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/are-you-actually-scared-that-we-ll-become-communists</link>
      <description>What?  “Karl Marx’s dream?”  So… if laws are passed to enforce the rights of children, we’ll become communists?  This is laughably paranoid.   Even the... </description>
      <author>CNVEP</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:41:23 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/are-you-actually-scared-that-we-ll-become-communists</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Other Bad Ideas Happened For a Long Time Too</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/other-bad-ideas-happened-for-a-long-time-too</link>
      <description>This is such a goofy argument; I hardly know where to begin. The equation of how long a practice has been in use with the inherent wisdom of said practice is ludicrous.  Here are a few other “disciplinary methods” that have gone on... </description>
      <author>CNVEP</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:37:49 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/other-bad-ideas-happened-for-a-long-time-too</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are These People Reading What I'm Saying?</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/no-support-in-the-bible-for-spanking</link>
      <description>Are these people reading what I’m saying? Apparently not. I said, clearly, there is no Biblical support for  spanking  per se. As for invoking my Lord and Savior’s behavior as the model, can we state for the record that Jesus was not a parent? I... </description>
      <author>John Rosemond</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:10:07 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/no-support-in-the-bible-for-spanking</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Many if Not Most Parents Accomplish Next to Nothing With Time Out...</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-doesn-t-work-and-is-harmful</link>
      <description>The fact is, many if not most parents accomplish next to nothing with time out, taking away privileges, or any other disciplinary consequence. For example, parents who use time out often report that they use time out over and over again for the same... </description>
      <author>John Rosemond</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:10:07 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-doesn-t-work-and-is-harmful</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By What Standard?</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/labeling-and-name-calling-does-not-add-to-the-debate</link>
      <description>By what standard of cultural well-being can No Spankers claim that society is better off when children are not spanked? The countries that have banned  spanking  have done so primarily because they foolishly signed on to one of the most socialist... </description>
      <author>John Rosemond</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:10:07 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/labeling-and-name-calling-does-not-add-to-the-debate</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Polite Term is &quot;Hogwash&quot;</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-is-hitting-plain-and-simple</link>
      <description>I didn't say that because something has been around for centuries, millenia even, makes it right. If you're going to argue with me, perhaps you should strive to comprehend what I'm saying first instead of simply reacting with a knee-jerk. I'm saying... </description>
      <author>John Rosemond</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:10:05 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-is-hitting-plain-and-simple</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Harm?</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-is-banned-because-of-harm-and-inhumanity-to-children</link>
      <description>What harm? And if it's inhuman, then why have human parents been  spanking children  for longer than history records? My detractors cannot prove, using objective evidence, that spanking per se is harmful, so they appeal to emotion. They have... </description>
      <author>John Rosemond</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:10:03 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-is-banned-because-of-harm-and-inhumanity-to-children</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Corporal Punishment is Violence, Not Rhetoric </title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/again-this-is-rhetoric</link>
      <description>John Rosemond says that calling corporal punishment violence is “rhetoric.”   You cannot strike your spouse, your neighbor, or even your neighbor’s dog.   That’s not “rhetoric.”  That  is considered violence AND... </description>
      <author>Center for Effective Discipline</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:10:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/again-this-is-rhetoric</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spanking Doesn't Work and is Harmful</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-doesn-t-work-and-is-harmful</link>
      <description>John Rosemond says that most parents don’t accomplish anything by  spanking . They spank the same children over and over.   That means it is generally ineffective, even in his view.   He would have to agree that... </description>
      <author>Center for Effective Discipline</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:57 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-doesn-t-work-and-is-harmful</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spanking is Not a &quot;Valid&quot; Form of Punishment for Children </title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/this-is-rhetoric</link>
      <description>Rosemond claims that the problem is not  spanking  per se, but “the stupid way in which many parents administer spankings.”    That statement is demeaning of parents who... </description>
      <author>Center for Effective Discipline</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:57 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/this-is-rhetoric</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CED's Agenda to Support Teaching Positive Discipline </title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/finally-ced-reveals-its-real-agenda</link>
      <description>CED provides information about effects of physical punishment of children and alternatives.   CED’s real agenda is supporting parents through teaching positive discipline and the effects of physical punishment.?? When parents are aware of... </description>
      <author>Center for Effective Discipline</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:57 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/finally-ced-reveals-its-real-agenda</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Preponderance of Research Shows Spanking Harms Children</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/this-is-simply-wrong</link>
      <description>John Rosemond criticizes research done by Murray Straus and says he is biased and an “ersatz” researcher.   Rosemond holds up Robert Larzelere as an example of an unbiased researcher.   Larzelere... </description>
      <author>Center for Effective Discipline</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:57 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/this-is-simply-wrong</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rosemond Refutes Four Decades of Research</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/rosemond-refutes-four-decades-of-research</link>
      <description>John Rosemond refutes four decades of research showing harmfulness of corporal punishment. His authority is apparently his own experiences and his reading of the Bible. He demeans a premier researcher known throughout the world, Dr. Murray Straus of... </description>
      <author>Center for Effective Discipline</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:47 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/rosemond-refutes-four-decades-of-research</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No Support in the Bible for Spanking</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/no-support-in-the-bible-for-spanking</link>
      <description>Regarding Biblical support for hitting children, many people tell us that they espouse “Spare the rod and spoil the child.”   They believe it has a biblical basis (see link below, &quot;Materials...&quot;)... </description>
      <author>Center for Effective Discipline</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:47 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/no-support-in-the-bible-for-spanking</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spanking is Banned Because of Harm and Inhumanity to Children</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-is-banned-because-of-harm-and-inhumanity-to-children</link>
      <description>John Rosemond finds arguments over  spanking  of children become “hysterical” and we assume he means symptomatic of a nervous disorder and terribly funny. It is neither. More than one hundred nations have banned corporal... </description>
      <author>Center for Effective Discipline</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:44 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-is-banned-because-of-harm-and-inhumanity-to-children</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spanking is Hitting, Plain and Simple!</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-is-hitting-plain-and-simple</link>
      <description>John Rosemond says that parents have employed  spanking  for thousands of years.   That doesn’t make it right.    Many barbaric punishments that were once accepted in society – the thumbscrew, the rack,  burning at the s... </description>
      <author>Center for Effective Discipline</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:44 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/spanking-is-hitting-plain-and-simple</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This is Rhetoric</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/this-is-rhetoric</link>
      <description>This is rhetoric. Substitute any form of punishment for  spanking  and the result is equally meaningless. Indeed, effective discipline is the process by which the anti-social child is transformed into a willing disciple who will look up to his... </description>
      <author>John Rosemond</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:40 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/this-is-rhetoric</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This is Simply Wrong</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/this-is-simply-wrong</link>
      <description>This is simply wrong. The studies - and there are not &quot;hundreds&quot; of them - that have purported to show negative effects of  spanking  have been constructed to yield results consistent with researcher bias. The primary offender in this category is... </description>
      <author>John Rosemond</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:40 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/this-is-simply-wrong</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Finally, CED Reveals Its Real Agenda</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/finally-ced-reveals-its-real-agenda</link>
      <description>Finally, CED reveals its real agenda, which, as I've already said, is the elimination of the punishment of children. Positive discipline is the attempt to talk children into behaving appropriately. This leads straight to diagnosis and medication.</description>
      <author>John Rosemond</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:40 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/finally-ced-reveals-its-real-agenda</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Again, This is Rhetoric </title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/again-this-is-rhetoric</link>
      <description>Again, this is rhetoric. How's this: Sending a child to his room is the intentional use of isolation and rejection to stop misbehavior. Since it involves rejection, it is a psychologically abusive act. If an adult were isolated in a room, we would... </description>
      <author>John Rosemond</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:09:40 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/again-this-is-rhetoric</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>