<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Opposing Views - Does Acupuncture Really Work?</title>
    <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/does-acupuncture-work</link>
    <description>Opposing Views - Does Acupuncture Work? </description>
    <item>
      <title>How High Do You Want To Raise the Bar?</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/meta-analyses-are-not-predictive</link>
      <description>According to a paper written about randomization in clinical trials, the authors' state   &quot;RCTs are considered the most reliable form of scientific evidence in healthcare because they eliminate spurious causality and bias.&quot;    Most healthcare... </description>
      <author>Bill Reddy</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:37:24 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/meta-analyses-are-not-predictive</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lame and False Argument From Authority</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/lame-and-false-argument-from-authority</link>
      <description>That some physicians are using acupuncture says absolutely nothing about the evidence for it. This is a lame attempt at an argument from authority.   Further, the vast majority of doctors do no use acupuncture. In a recent survey only 6% of patients... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:37:03 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/lame-and-false-argument-from-authority</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Meta-Analyses are Not Predictive</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/meta-analyses-are-not-predictive</link>
      <description>I did not ask for meta-analyses - rather I said that a systematic review of the literature is necessary to know what the evidence says. A meta-analysis is not a systematic review, and generally suffers from the &quot;garbage in - garbage out&quot; problem.  A... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:36:58 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/meta-analyses-are-not-predictive</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fMRI Statistical Significance is Hard to Acheive</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/fmris-are-tricky</link>
      <description>The reason is that MRI's are EXPENSIVE.&amp;nbsp; To run a study with hundreds of patients&amp;nbsp;performing before/after MRI's&amp;nbsp;is cost&amp;nbsp;prohibitive.&amp;nbsp; If we had all the money in the world to throw at detailed studies of acupuncture, it would... </description>
      <author>Bill Reddy</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:26:26 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/fmris-are-tricky</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fMRIs are Tricky</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/fmris-are-tricky</link>
      <description>I am a neuroscientist and have read much fMRI (functional MRI) literature. This is a very tricky technique requiring many subjects and strict protocol - because the brain is constantly displaying chaotic activity and responding to a host of internal... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:26:25 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/fmris-are-tricky</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Insurance Companies Use Actuarians For a Reason</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/another-argument-from-authority</link>
      <description>Dr. Novella, you're burying your head in the sand.&amp;nbsp; Actuarial science has a high degree of accuracy.&amp;nbsp; If you SMOKE, your automobile insurance will be higher than a non-smoker because statistically you'll be in more accidents due to the... </description>
      <author>Bill Reddy</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:26:25 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/another-argument-from-authority</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Study is Lousy</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/undeniable-evidence-of-acupuncture-and-knee-osteoarthritis</link>
      <description>Reddy claims that by my logic one study would show that acupuncture works - but this is the exact opposite of what I said. My point is that you have to look at the whole literature. One study is never compelling. Also - I am not checking picking - I... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:26:23 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/undeniable-evidence-of-acupuncture-and-knee-osteoarthritis</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Historical Revisionism</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/pre-scientific-yes-superstition-no</link>
      <description>None of this establishes the existence of qi, or meridians. These are pre-scientific notions that have been discarded by modern biology, chemistry, and physics. The vitalists lost this debate 150 years ago - there is no life force. Qi does not... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:26:23 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/pre-scientific-yes-superstition-no</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Non Specific Effects Don't Count</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/according-to-nih-acupuncture-has-plausible-mechanisms</link>
      <description>First - the &quot;NIH&quot; statement was by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) and was packed with acupuncture proponents and devoid of skeptics or even neutral scientists. I hardly consider that statement authoritative or... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:26:23 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/according-to-nih-acupuncture-has-plausible-mechanisms</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Argument from Authority</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/argument-from-authority</link>
      <description>This is an obvious logical fallacy - the argument from authority.   I work at Yale and I have seen exactly how politics and misguided political correctness has allowed a minority of proponents to insert their preferred modalities into academic... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:26:23 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/argument-from-authority</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another Argument From Authority.</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/another-argument-from-authority</link>
      <description>This is just nonsense. Insurance companies are companies - they will cover what is cheapest (whether it works or not, especially for symptomatic therapy, rather than preventive or curative treatments). Also, they want to attract customers and will... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:26:23 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/another-argument-from-authority</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Undeniable Evidence of Acupuncture and Knee Osteoarthritis</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/undeniable-evidence-of-acupuncture-and-knee-osteoarthritis</link>
      <description>You make the statement that under tightly controlled studies, the results of acupuncture are negative.&amp;nbsp; I beg to differ.&amp;nbsp; You also say that proponents of acupuncture &quot;cherry pick&quot; studies, yet you cherry pick studies with negative results.</description>
      <author>Bill Reddy</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:25:58 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/undeniable-evidence-of-acupuncture-and-knee-osteoarthritis</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pre-Scientific? YES. Superstition?  No.</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/pre-scientific-yes-superstition-no</link>
      <description>You state that &quot;Acupuncture is the practice of placing thin needles at acupuncture points, which are said to coincide with points at which meridians cross...&quot;  I'm not too sure what comic book you read to learn about acupuncture, but in 361... </description>
      <author>Bill Reddy</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:23:36 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/pre-scientific-yes-superstition-no</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Animal Studies Demonstrate Measurable Changes </title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/animal-studies-demonstrate-measurable-changes</link>
      <description>Do the animals in these studies feel &quot;good&quot; about acupuncture or the acupuncturist treating them?&amp;nbsp;   Do they have nice music in the background and candles burning during the experiments to relax the animals?  In the study report entitled... </description>
      <author>Bill Reddy</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:23:30 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/animal-studies-demonstrate-measurable-changes</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>There's Been STRONG and REPRODUCIBLE Evidence of Meridians</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/there-s-been-strong-and-reproducible-evidence-of-meridians</link>
      <description>You say that &quot;Meridans andd acupuncture points are a myth&quot;.&amp;nbsp;  Meridians or Energy pathways in the body that&amp;nbsp;form the foundation of  Traditional Chinese Medicine  are, in fact, WELL DOCUMENTED, as early as 1950 by Yoshio Nakatani and later... </description>
      <author>Bill Reddy</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:23:28 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/there-s-been-strong-and-reproducible-evidence-of-meridians</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>According to NIH, Acupuncture HAS Plausible Mechanisms</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/according-to-nih-acupuncture-has-plausible-mechanisms</link>
      <description>Once again, according to the NIH consensus statement on acupuncture ( http://consensus.nih.gov/1997/1997Acupuncture107html.htm ), they state &quot;Many studies in animals and humans have demonstrated that acupuncture can cause multiple biological... </description>
      <author>Bill Reddy</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:23:23 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/according-to-nih-acupuncture-has-plausible-mechanisms</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Plural of Anecdote is Anecdontes, Not Data</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/the-plural-of-anecdote-is-anecdontes-not-data</link>
      <description>This is nothing more than an argument ad populi and appeal to anecdotal evidence. As I have already argued, blood letting survived for over 2,000 years as the standard accepted practice. The placebo effect is well documented, as well as a variety of... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:22:55 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/the-plural-of-anecdote-is-anecdontes-not-data</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Risk vs. Benefit</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/risk-vs-benefit</link>
      <description>This argument is yet another logical fallacy – a non sequitur. The state of modern science-based medicine says nothing about the purported mechanisms and effectiveness of acupuncture. You could use the same line of argument to... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:22:52 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/risk-vs-benefit</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Systematic Reviews Show the Evidence is Negative</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/systematic-reviews-show-the-evidence-is-negative</link>
      <description>This argument shows very poor scientific reasoning. Arguments concerning mechanism of action and efficacy are mixed together in a confusing way. The lack of a plausible mechanism makes acupuncture very suspect, and raises the bar for an appropriate... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:22:50 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/systematic-reviews-show-the-evidence-is-negative</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The WHO and NCCAM</title>
      <link>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/the-who-and-nccam</link>
      <description>Bill Reddy asserts that the WHO and NCCAM in 1983 have reviewed the evidence and support acupuncture as safe and effective for a number of medical conditions, but this assertion is simply wrong. Bill does not provide a specific reference or any... </description>
      <author>Steven Novella, MD</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:22:47 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.opposingviews.com/counters/the-who-and-nccam</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>