Yes, WHO Faked Swine Flu Pandemic and is Now Lying About It
By Michael Fumento
The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying “The sky is falling!” like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. “The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible,” the agency claims on its Web site.
But I’ve been documenting the hoax since before a pandemic was declared, back when the WHO was just posturing about a proclamation.
I first showed that swine flu was exceptionally mild, when by definition flu pandemics had to be severe. I later showed that the WHO changed the definition to match swine flu, which required it to eliminate severity as a factor. That in turn makes the definition of “flu pandemic” absolutely worthless.
I also explained why the WHO did it. That it wasn’t mere bureaucratic turf-enlarging, but rather first an effort to cover up yet another WHO hysteria, over avian flu, and then an attempt to bring “social justice” to the world and redistribute wealth between nations. That from the very mouth of its secretary general!
Now with a European watchdog group calling hearings on what it’s labeled a “false pandemic,” the WHO is claiming 1) that it didn’t change the definition, and 2) that there was never a definition that required severity.
These are incredibly bold lies, given that you can find the old definition on the Web and people like me tell you right where to go to find it. Like here.
My Forbes piece, “Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic,” has a video clip of WHO swine flu “czar” Keiji Fukuda (see picture) lying through his teeth, along with another link to written testimony in which he lies about a different aspect.
The European group calls the WHO’s actions “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.” Just so, and the more the WHO does it’s CYA routine, the worse it gets. Pinocchio’s nose is already poking out the window.













Yes, WHO Faked Swine Flu Pandemic and is Now Lying About It
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Irresponsible not to take any 'flu epidemic seriously?
Fortunately, so far, the H1N1 ' flu has been generally mild in most people, although the small number of young pregnant females who died might possibly quibble about the "mild". I think influenza A should always be taken seriously, because of all the infections, it's influenza that's most likely to cause a serious pandemic. The Spanish 'flu of 1918/19 was mild for a year before it became virulent and started killing large numbers of people. Would the WHO be criticised if they had ignored the swine 'flu?
- bachfiend
February 7, 2010 4:32AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Over reaction, or prudent prevention?
It is quite possible that the massive vaccination effort, as well as the awareness of the swine flu , took the steam out of what would have been a very nasty outbreak (and thus it looks mild)...
My question for the CEI is as follows: How long should the WHO have waited before acting? With the out of season spike and the H1N1's proclivity for hitting younger people harder then the usually vulnerable populations what do YOU think the start of a global pandemic would look like? Should the WHO have waited until people started burring their friends and neighbors in lime pits before calling a pandemic?
Back in January I had to make a cross country trip via airplane ... at every takeoff we were delayed, because the jets had to go through a de-icing process... Sitting by the wing at one point there did not appear to be a large amount of ice on the wing... but I certainly did not complain about the delay (nor did any other passenger voice a complaint).
- MrBook
February 7, 2010 7:21AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Hysteria
Hysteria! Quite simply, it is popular through the television . The WHO is not solely responsible for crying "The sky is falling!" when the major news networks in the US also made their contributions to the pandemonium. If it bleeds, it leads. If you threaten people with their very lives then a decent percentage of those people will rush to purchase products [ vaccines ] that will ensure their survival.
Truth is irrelevant to folks who live by the TV .
- m46607
February 17, 2010 8:23AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.