Mccollum

Wiccan Clergyman Denied Right to Become Prison Chaplain

Opinion by AUSCS
(December 01, 2009) in Religion / Religion in Society
Americans United Urges Appeals Court to give Prison-Chaplaincy Applicant His Day in court, Has Right to Challenge Government-Imposed Religious Discrimination

Religious minorities should have the right to go to court and challenge discriminatory hiring practices imposed by the government, Americans United for Separation of Church and State has told the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

In a friend-of-the-court brief in McCollum v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Americans United urged the appellate court to allow Patrick McCollum, a Wiccan clergyman, to challenge a state prison policy that limits paid chaplaincy positions to persons who are Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim or Native American.

“When government discriminates in hiring on religious grounds, those who are left out should have every right to sue,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United executive director. “Job candidates who face this type of religious discrimination should at the least have a chance to go to court and fight for their constitutional rights.”

McCollum (pictured, above left) is a qualified candidate for a chaplain position at the California Department of Corrections but cannot be considered for the job because of his religious beliefs. He brought a lawsuit against the prison, but a federal district court ruled that he lacked “standing” -- the right to sue.

The court said a legal challenge to the prison’s chaplain policy can only be brought by an inmate, not someone seeking to be hired. In addition, the court denied McCollum’s claim because he could not prove he would be hired even if the state policy was changed. The court also denied McCollum’s standing as a taxpayer.

AU’s brief disputes these arguments, stating that the Constitution and civil rights law demand that McCollum have his day in court.

“More than simply being legally erroneous,” the brief asserts, “the [lower] court’s reasoning would inflict serious damage on the viability of all employment-discrimination claims.

“Whether the State needs to hire a Wiccan chaplain and, if so, whether McCollum is the right person for the job, may be unclear,” the brief continues. “What is clear, however, is that the district court erred in denying McCollum the chance to have his claims heard.”

Joining AU on the Nov. 30 brief are the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, The Interfaith Alliance and the Hindu American Foundation.

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • SolarSanitizer
    I agree with this:

    "Religious minorities should have the right to go to court and challenge discriminatory hiring practices imposed by the government ..."

    They do have the right to seek redress for grievances, as per the first Amendment.

    - SolarSanitizerUS December 1, 2009 1:39PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • thebigmike
    Court made the right call

    The court made the correct call on this one as McCullum's case is not to hire him specifically, but only to apply a neutral standard for determining which faiths require a paid chaplain.

    This is important because it means he does not have Traditional Standing, ie. he has not been directly harmed in anyway by this. He is not now, nor has he ever been an inmate, so the lack of a paid Wiccan chaplain has never affected his religious practices. So, he has no traditional standing as a practitioner.

    If the CDCR did perform such a neutral study, there is no guarantee that it would find in favor of creating a Wiccan chaplain position. If it did find one was needed, there is no guarantee that he would be the person hired. As his income has not been directly impacted by the lack of this position, he has no traditional standing as a prospective employee.

    As for his claim of standing as a tax payer, the Court made another good call. The Supreme Court found in Arakaki v. Lingle that a taxpayer does not have standing to challenge a specific expenditure based only on the fact that they are a taxpayer. The exception for the Establishment Clause recognized Doe v. Madison and applied to non-federal entities in Americans United for Separation of Church and State v. Prison Fellowship Ministries, Inc. The problem with using this as standing is the the funding must be proven to be a considerable amount spent solely on the activities complained of.

    McCollum isn't asking that the state STOP spending significant funds, he is asking that they BEGIN spending significant funds. Thus, he does not have grounds as a taxpayer under the Establishment clause.

    It's the exact same decision reached in the 1988 case Reimers v. State of Or.

    Any one of the Wiccan inmates WOULD have grounds, and would easily win a case forcing the CDCR to conduct the survey, however as the brief pointed out they already did and a Wiccan chaplain is not needed.

    Once again, the CDCR did conduct a study based on six neutral criteria, and found that a Wiccan chaplain was not needed.

    - thebigmikeUS December 1, 2009 3:48PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • atliberty
    Judges

    take a secret oath to violate the constitution any time doing so serves the agenda of the plutocracy that runs this nation. We don'r have elected officials we have Bilderburg Trilateral selected officials. My higher power is nature and I have no rights because "in god we trust" is written on our money . The US is run by the same families that put Hitler in power, made money from that and made money from the deaths of our soldiers to take him out. Zionist war profiteers of NWO run this planet I don't know exactly how we will get then out of control but if we don't we will become extinct and no anthropomorphic god is gong to save us on our final judgment day of extinction. If we would have just remained Pagans all along the world would be a kinder safer place.

    - atlibertyUS December 2, 2009 11:25AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • TheCatholicHeretic
      Huh?

      I believe this is off topic.

      - TheCatholicHereticUS December 2, 2009 11:34AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • atliberty
        Duh?

        When the god of a nation is MAMMON of course a Wiccan which is a Pagan religion is denied. Off topic? Get up off the floor and back on your rocking chair already! The dude wanted to teach prisoners in the nation with the highest per capita incerceration rate about there being a GODDESS like mother nature and all. Again if I'm off topic you are off your rocker.

        - atlibertyUS December 2, 2009 11:47AM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • daMamma
          argument

          Truly the man's argument is not that he "should" be hired as a paid chaplain so much as it is that he is outright "banned" from even being considered for the position simply on the basis of his religion . And that IS discrimination .

          - daMammaCA December 2, 2009 12:40PM

          Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • thebigmike
            Read the Court Opinion

            The question was not about him or even about Wicca specifically, it was about forcing the CDCR to apply a neutral set of standards to see if a Wiccan chaplain was needed. Even if he had won, there was no guarantee that the CDCR would find that one was needed, and if they did, no guarantee he would be the person hired.

            On a side note, the Court mentioned that the CDCR did end up applying a set of neutral standards to see if the position was needed, and it's not.

            - thebigmikeUS December 3, 2009 4:33PM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • dancetoday
      Hitler and Zionist can not be the same!

      This is quite a paranoid sounding post. I doubt reason is something you are interested in, but surely you would understand that saying families that put Hitler in power being in charge and Zionists running the planet are contradictions!

      - dancetodayUS December 2, 2009 12:05PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • atliberty
        Ha'avara agreement 1933

        http://www.answers.com/topic/transfer-agreement-1
        http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-Jews /+Doc-Jews-IntimateRelationToNazis/HaavaraAgreement.htm

        That is just one small deal of all that was made between the Zionists and the 3rd Reich. Study who was in charge of the US Federal Reserve in the 1930s and '40s? Zionists who made a great deal money knowing the common peasant working Jews were being gassed. I am not at all hurt by you calling me lacking in reason and paranoid. I can forgive a stupid brainwashed person that won't know the NWO until they come for you. I don't believe in god ; none the less I hope your god forgives you for being so misinformed and letting the beast worshippers prevail. When you are ready to appologize I will accept.

        - atlibertyUS December 2, 2009 4:39PM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • TheCatholicHeretic
          Wow...

          Shouldn't you still be in your Y2K Bunker?

          - TheCatholicHereticUS December 3, 2009 9:46AM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • atliberty
            case

            This case fits somewhere in between: Fellowship of Humanity v. County of Alameda, 153 Cal. App. 2d 673, 315 P.2d 394. & Washington Ethical Society v. District of Columbia, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 371, 249 F.2d 127(1957); where they won the right to have the same tax breaks as a church and Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), where Smith won the right to use peyote for religious use but the government did not have to pay him unemployment for firing him because of he was a drug counselor on peyote. One issue differs is the state prison pays ministers to do the Abrahamic thing and Native thing but nothing else. If he has requests from prisoners for Pagan religious service, he or the said prisoners should win. Oh and for the ones who wrote condescending comments think about this: I was thinkin about god givin' mary the infinite wang and knockin' 'er up and stuff. Like common now all that omnipotent all powerful stuff had to turn to sperm and DNA somewhere along the way. Imagine, squeekie squeekie squeekie wam bam thank you mam wha la JESUS


            - atlibertyUS December 3, 2009 6:34PM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • emikoala
      Pagans kinder and safer?

      I'm a pagan myself, but let's not refuse to see our own flaws. The pagans were plenty brutal themselves - the pagan Romans dragged their defeated war enemies through the streets behind chariots up the temple steps to be sacrificed to Mars, the pagan Greeks' democracy was really a plutocracy, and the pagan Celts were known head hunters. Of course these societies also had many good things to boast about, like the relative freedom enjoyed by their women , but we're kidding ourselves if we think that pagan religions would have prevented our problems.

      - emikoalaUS December 2, 2009 4:39PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • canteenkenny
      canteenkenny

      That must be some good stuff you are smoking . Care to share?

      - canteenkennyUS December 3, 2009 5:22PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • BaphometRex666
    Sinagogue of Satan gives full support!

    HFS,
    on behalf of the Sinagogue of Satan, I and we would like to state we fully support Mr. McCollum in this venture.
    Since our government practices religious discrimination America's claim of "Freedom of Religion" is a falsehood. Until minority religions have the same rights Christianity does this is not a free country. It is a country that has been monopolized by Christian bigotry and bias . I urge everyone and every group to please give Mr. McCollum your full support. I also ask you all to support Gay marriage for it is a case of religious discrimination as well.
    As you all have seen Mr. Obama is working on correcting the injustices created by the real enemies of America please continue to support him in his efforts as well.
    ISN
    666
    Rev. Michael S. Margolin
    Co-founder of the Sinagogue of Satan

    - BaphometRex666US December 2, 2009 1:43PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • daMamma
      full support

      Great points on both counts.

      It is the dominance of the Christian religion that promotes discrimination in both areas. The root of the problem is non-conformity with the belief system of this particular religion.

      One has loads of " religious freedom " as long as there is conformity in believing in the same god and basic rules of play. There is religious "tolerances" for groups such as Buddhist, and Hindu. A lot of intolerance for the pagan faiths such as Wicca, they are just too far outside the box. Satanism, well now we just can't have that all all! You are way too far outside the box for the mainstream folks to deal.

      Personally I don't care what anyone believes as long as it doesn't involve blood sacrifices of humans or the use of little children in any manner. Believing in the Flying Spaghetti Monster makes as much sense to me as some invisible guy in the sky.

      - daMammaCA December 2, 2009 2:10PM

      Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • jochanaan
    Qualified

    Last year I became acquainted with a Wiccan priest. While as a Bible-believing Christian I cannot agree with his theology, he is wise, knowledgeable, gentle and loving. If Patrick McCollum is anything like my acquaintance, he is in every way qualified to be a prison chaplain, and should have the right to challenge this discriminatory policy.

    - jochanaanUS December 2, 2009 3:17PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • TheCatholicHeretic
      "as a Bible-believing Christian"

      So you believe Matthew 28:16-20 is what???

      - TheCatholicHereticUS December 4, 2009 9:15AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • jochanaan
        Matthew 28

        ...is a challenge and command to us Christians --yet we cannot teach those who don't want to be taught. Nor do we have any right to prohibit those of other religions from teaching or preaching . If they preach a different " gospel " from us--well, that's between them, their listeners/ students and God.

        Our business as Christians is not to try to silence other messages--except by the power of our own. And I believe that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is strong enough to meet all challenges from other faiths. We don't need to resort to discriminatory practices to spread it.

        - jochanaanUS December 4, 2009 2:45PM

        Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • whatHistory
    Is here is a large enough constituency for a Wiccan Chaplain?

    Yes. If there is a large enough constituency for a Wiccan Chaplain the prison should hire one. If there is not then why waste your tax dollar just to provide a dole for someone who is not needed?

    - whatHistoryUS December 2, 2009 4:30PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • BaphometRex666
      Good and valid point

      HFS,
      agreed if there are no Wiccan prisoners than there is no need for a Wiccan Chaplin. Funny if Christianity is so good how come our jails are full of Christians ?
      ISN
      666

      - BaphometRex666US December 3, 2009 12:13AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • canteenkenny
        canteenkenny

        Most of those 'christians' in prison did not darken the door of a church (as if that were really a measure of one's faith) until they had passed through the prison gates, and then decided that they needed help afterall.

        - canteenkennyUS December 3, 2009 5:27PM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • JKM121
          besides which

          Christianity isn't about being good; it's for those who are incapable of being good

          - JKM121US December 11, 2009 1:51AM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • canteenkenny
    canteenkenny

    This is a continuing headache, which is the result of the push for 'tolerance at all costs'. If we call all religions equal in all ways, we can not discriminate against any one, in any way. But all of the main line religions have prohibitions against witchcraft so, to hire a Wiccan with the expectation he could counsel a christian inmate in need is ridiculous. A Wiccan can already volunteer at any California prison but, if he is paid staff, he is required to perform tasks other than just for the Wiccan inmates. Is saying no to hiring him discrimination ? Yes! Is hiring him (for that job) reasonable? No! What to do? I'm glad it is not my call to make.

    - canteenkennyUS December 3, 2009 5:20PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • BaphometRex666
      Discrimination

      HFS,
      the problem with discrimination is once you begin to discriminate who is next and where does it end?
      ISN
      666

      - BaphometRex666US December 4, 2009 12:43AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • JKM121
      paid chaplains

      my understanding is that paid chaplains minister only to those who request them; so a Muslim chaplain wouldn't be required to minister to a Jew, unless the Jewish inmate asked for a Muslim chaplain. I think jochanaan put it best in his comment "Qualified".

      - JKM121US December 11, 2009 2:00AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...