Why is Bestiality So Hard to Prosecute?
Mention the word “bestiality” and you’ll likely elicit one of two
responses: kindergartner-like snickering, or horror. I know, because
I’ve done it a lot (mentioned the word, not done the deed). In my
animal law speeches to lawyers and others, they are mostly horrified at
the thought and mention of humans having sexual contact with animals;
most had never had reason to consider it before I came along. Why am I
talking about it? Because of ALDF’s efforts to raise awareness of the
problem so we can attack it with criminal consequences.
Our awareness-raising efforts were recently aided by two news stories that have apparently attracted lots of gaping attention: one from New Jersey
in which a judge dropped animal cruelty charges against a former cop
charged with molesting cows, ruling there was insufficient evidence
they were tormented. New Jersey has no separate, stand-alone criminal
law prohibiting bestiality.
In the second news story, which was reportedly carried even in the Australian media, two men and a woman in Tennessee
are charged with performing sex acts with horses and a dog, and police
are looking into whether money was exchanged for the ability to have
sexual access to the animals.
By the way, these defendants all
have two things in common: one is that they’ve also hurt others in the
past – the former cop in New Jersey is also charged with molesting
three girls, and one of the Tennessee defendants became infamous years
ago for molesting horses in Washington state in a case in which his pal
died from internal injuries caused by the bestiality acts. The other
commonality is that video of the acts became the defendants’ undoing.
At the beginning of this decade, ALDF’s Criminal Justice Program
became aware of the problems that prosecutors were having in trying to
convict persons who sexually assaulted animals. They told us stories of
family members and farm owners who were appalled to catch relatives in
the act of assaulting the family puppy or invaders to their farm
assaulting their animal friends in nighttime barn trysts captured on
hidden video after suspicions were raised. The local prosecutors found
they were unable to do anything legally because their state bestiality
laws were tossed out decades earlier when many states updated their
criminal sex offense laws to also get rid of sodomy, adultery, and
other seemingly outdated sex laws.
Some prosecutors tried to
prosecute the abusers under their state’s existing animal cruelty laws,
but that often proved impossible, as evidenced by the New Jersey case
above. ALDF then endeavored to draft a model “sexual assault of an
animal” law and get it passed wherever necessary, starting in Oregon in
2001. Since then we’ve been fairly successful (really, who’s gonna
stand up and object to passing such a law?) but our work continues. If
you are interested in knowing more about this problem, what ALDF is
doing in this area of the law and how you can help, see our new online
resource, "The Crime of Bestiality/Zoophilia: Sexual Assault of an Animal."
Now, for those of us saddled with more juvenile sensibilities, no more snickering!












Why is Bestiality So Hard to Prosecute?
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Why is it so hard to prosecute?
Maybe because it's impossible to have the victim testify? Also, I don't think animals go to the hospital to get a rape kit so DNA evidence can't be analyzed.
Perhaps the New Jersey judge was correct when he dropped the charges against the cop for "lack of evidence" since its obviously nearly impossible to prove the crime occurred beyond a reasonable doubt unless you have video and / or multiple witnesses.
- caelum
October 29, 2009 10:11AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Actually
Actually, if there is a single witness to the crime , or even reasonable suspicion, it should be provable with forensic evidence in many cases. Whether agencies have the resources to invest is another question, but given the possible link between those who molest animals and those who molest children (there should be more research done to demonstrate the truth or falsity of this claim, definitely), it seems that it might be worthwhile to pursue such crimes, particularly where pain or injury is inflicted upon the animal.
- Babaroni
October 29, 2009 11:14AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Because We Are Beasts?
Sorry to say this, but I think it's two-fold:
A) There are more kindergartn-brained sniggerers out there than any of us would care to admit and a lot of them vote ;
B) Most laws do not protect animals , especially farm animals...they are considered produce, and have the same protection from abuse as corn. Some species have minimal "protection" as to slaughter, but nothing during the entire course of their lives.
This is especially true of poultry which is officially classified as farm produce by the USDA, thanks to the efforts of PACS. They have no protection period...from birth to death.
- joolmaker
October 31, 2009 11:12AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
the reason
PEOPLE ARE WORSE THAN ANIMALS..
- Alayna Staggers
January 27, 2010 5:00PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.