WHO Swine Flu Chief Caught on Video Lying About "Pandemic"

Share This Story

By Michael Fumento

Even before the World Health Organization declared its phony pandemic last summer, its designated fibber-in-chief has been Keiji Fukuda. Yet I’ve never been able to catch him a lie so explicit that he couldn’t somehow worm out of it. Till now.

Thus when he said (and still does), the virus may be mild now but it could mutate to become worse I would point out that this would be the first time a flu virus has suddenly changed course like that. But technically he was right. Finally, I’ve caught him with his nose stretched out three feet long - and on a vital issue.

As I pointed out upon the WHO’s pandemic declaration in June, the definition previously required “enormous numbers of deaths.” But the agency desperately wanted a pandemic and swine flu, vastly milder than ordinary flu, clearly didn’t fit. So they simply penned a new definition to match swine flu, making deaths irrelevant and explicitly declaring “mild” strains would qualify.

Since flu always strikes throughout the world, the only reasonable distinction between a normal year and a pandemic year is severity. So clearly this was politically motivated, and I’ve addressed those motivations. They include everything from power grabbing and money grubbing to a hard left agenda of redistributing wealth and instituting “social justice.”

Now the WHO is defending itself against charges of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) that it created a “false pandemic” in “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.” To which the WHO disingenuously responds that it is a real pandemic - by its fresh and nonsensical interpretation.

But the WHO can’t change what the old definition said. At the PACE hearing, though, Fukuda boldly told the assembled experts, reporters, and, yes, cameramen: “Having severe deaths has never been part of the WHO definition.”

Here’s a snapshot of the WHO definition, also viewable at the agency’s Web site, at the very time swine flu broke out.

who-pandemic-definition-2005

First WHO Director-General Margaret Chan needs to fire Fukuda. And then she needs to fire herself.

Share This Story

`
Pike's picture

Don't misrepresent the facts Mr. Fumento, just to make your case.

The WHO didn't change the criteria especially for the H1N1-virus.
The process of changing the definition of the criteria has been started long before the appearance of the novel H1N1-strain. The reasoning behind this change is documented here: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/why_revise/en/index.html

End of November 2007 a first meeting was held to begin the process of updating WHO’s pandemic influenza preparedness guidance. A second meeting was held on 5-7 March 2008 in Lyon, France, another one in Geneva in May 2008.
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/revision_process/en/index.html

A draft of the new working documents was prepared and in October 2008 the WHO requested public feedback. http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/panflu/news/oct2408who.html

The publication of the new criteria, which was originally estimated to be in the beginning of 2009 but delayed, and the appearance of a novel flu strain going global is a mere coincidence.

In addition, a pandemic is an epidemiological term, and doesn't state anything about the virulence of the pandemic agens. Any virology textbook will state that "a pandemic is a global epidemic".

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

OV Social

 

randomness