Who's Offended by the American Flag in Denair, Calif.?
To whom do we pledge our allegiance?
Anything American and anything Christ-centered seems to be "unconstitutional" these days. The litmus test that appears to be in use in determining if something is constitutional or not, is "if someone may become offended by another's actions." How flaky is that for a litmus test - when we can each vouch for our own emotions randomly ranging from high to low at any given moment.
Does the other side of this argument ever see that they are offending those who just so happen to love this country and those who believe in Jesus Christ as their personal Lord and Savior? Honestly, do they ever consider anyone's feelings beyond their own? Or, does what really matter to them is that their feelings are never imposed upon?
The latest actions taken by the Denair Unified School District in Denair, California, to drop their ban on the American flag would be a triumph for American freedom. However, my joy is somewhat overshadowed by just how far we've allowed this anti-American, anti-Christian, and progressive-thinking foolishness to go.
What would embolden a school administrator to confront a middle school-aged child to demand that he no longer display his American flag on his bike while his bike is on school property?i,ii The reason for the administrator's brazen behavior is simply because others had complained about the American flag. Others were offended by its presence.
So, the logic flows like this: while in America, an American child, in honor of men like his American grandfather who is a veteran, cannot ride his bike displaying an American flag, on the property of a school funded by American tax dollars, simply because SOMEONE was offended. Should we all, right here and now, abdicate our rights because of some random person's emotional state - whether that state is rational or not? By the way, which superior person among them will decide what offense is rational or not? Can anyone say "communist-style living"? The next time you're at the grocery store and someone should dare say your taste in style is offensive to them....well...who knows what might happen next.
This story of what's happening on American soil is absolutely ridiculous. Though, we shouldn't be too surprised when the leader of our own country is constantly apologizing for us being Americans.iii, iv, v
I'm sure, the administrators of the Denair school district thought they were being really "smart" in their actions. I'm sure they congratulated themselves on doing a really "progressive" thing. Yet, in their pursuit of progress they regressed. A house divided, cannot stand. America is the house and we are a seriously divided country. Not like in the days of old, but our division strikes at the core of who we are: our Freedom, our Sovereignty, and the representation not domination by our elected officials.
The overturning of this silly ban highlights just how ridiculous the actions of the school district and others like them really are. If we would each commit to becoming aware of our unalienable Rights endowed by our Creator, the same rights protected by our Constitution, then when "intelligent" people like this ban attack our Rights, we will not cower down. Instead, we will stand bold and educated.
As a side note, I can't help but wonder how these "American-hating", "do whatever feel good" people would fair if they were planted in the middle of Afghanistan. I bet they would find a new appreciation for America - the BEST country on earth.
Say it with me...
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."vi
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter
Sign-Up Now for the Opposing Views Daily Newsletter

Come on guys n gals, a flag is just a flag.............Also I think that a majority of American people have become somewhat paranoid. The world does not hate America, they are just fed up with the war machine that the Bush Administration nurtured. As for the God thing, well whats the point in that, looks like it hasn't made an appearance, kind of rude really considering the amount of books its generated :)
Like may stories like put forth by fringe groups (right or left) this story smells of half truth and exaggeration.
From: http://www.examiner.com/stanislaus-county-political-buzz-in-modesto/us-flag-incident-has-denair-school-hot-water
I found the following quote
""As most of you are aware, we’ve had a school issue that has risen to the level of national news coverage. This incident occurred on Monday, November 8th when a campus supervisor asked one of our middle school students to remove an American flag from his bicycle while he was on school grounds. This request was based on concerns for the student’s immediate safety, and to give school staff time to investigate a potentially dangerous situation, involving threats to this
student."
If it was a safety issue then telling the student to take down the flag while threats are investigated seems like a reasonable step for the administrators to take.
Painting the school administration as "America haters" when they were attempting to ensure student safety is intellectually dishonest.
your opinion and speaking about what you thought if your life was threatened and someone commanded you to shut up?
If it was a safety issue then they should protect the person not limit their expression under the guise of protection.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
it depends... If someone told me that there was strong evidence that if I wore a hat that day that I'd be shot then I'd certainly consider not wearing a hat.
They did protect the student... by informing the student of the issue and instructing that student to take down the flag while the issue was further investigated.
As I have pointed out above... our information regarding the nature of the threats against the student is very sparse so it cannot be easily said "the teacher behaved appropriately / inappropriately. What we do know refutes the OPs assertion that the student was asked to take down his flag as part of a permanent ban on flying the US flag.
you have hidden homophobia you're sharing. Because if a homosexual is being bullied for his flamboyant nature or she is being bullied for her butch nature they should change the way they dress and act to fit in so they don't get bullied. You're a clever one hiding that view like this.
Protecting the student is allowing them to be who they are allowed to be in this Country. THEM. Meaning the flag is important to America no matter who says otherwise. Limiting that is always wrong...period. Therefore they were wrong. You're trying to flip it to make them right because you hate the flag. Why else would you be defending their actions? Or you're a lame defense attorney that would lose in court...which is it?
Yes you can. Because telling someone to stop flying the American flag in America is wrong no matter the threat. Period.
Make one up. Let's see if you can infuse your dislike of the flag with something that can be convincing.
I can flip things too. It's easy.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
So if you knew that a sniper was going to shoot someone who was walking around with an US flag you wouldn't say anything to a person you saw carrying the US flag?
As to why I am "defending their actions"... All I have done is state that calling the teachers unamerican is disingenuous, as the limited information that we have does not support that claim.
What information we do have indicates that this action was taken to protect the student from a specific threat.
Why tell them what they can and cannot wear? Warn them, but not FORCE them. You should NEVER force someone to do something like that. Tell them and let them decide.
You are defending their actions. How are you not?
Limited information you use to accuse politicians of wrongs and yet you have morals now?
No. You have zero information on that. They said that's what they were doing. Where's their proof?
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
Schools have some latitude regarding what occurs on school grounds. Schools can institute dress codes, and even restrict speech (I.e. No profanity rules).
I am saying that their actions were not motivated by anti-Americanism, but rather by their obligation to protect the safety of the students.
What "limited information" is that? Being caught with a prostitute is fairly straight forward.
The only information we have on the teachers reasons comes from their statements... The rest is just right wing ranting. I distrust the ranting more then I distrust the teachers statements.
but not when it comes to the American Flag.
They cannot restrict the American Flag. Point to that rule. Good you know rules so well. I was starting to think you lost your love affair with them.
Rules are not the problem. Blindly following them (as you do) is.
It was a bad decision motivated by fear, not protection.
Out of context conversation.
You agree with the teacher because you'd remove the flag. /story.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
Why exactly is the flag afforded such special privilege regarding expression?
Where exactly is the "you cannot restrict the US flag" rule?
Motivated by fear for the student it would appear.
Which conversations?
I don't have access to the information that the teachers did, so I don't know if I would have made the same decision that they did.