Noose

White Supremacist Indicted After Mailing Noose to NAACP Leader

News by DOJ
(October 08, 2009) in Politics / Hate Crimes
WASHINGTON --- Daniel Lee Jones, of Portland, Ore., has been indicted and arrested for allegedly mailing a hangman’s noose to the Lima, Ohio, chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Justice Department announced today.

At the time he mailed the noose for the purpose of threatening Jason Upthegrove, Jones, 32, was a regional director of a group that advocated white supremacist ideology, according to the indictment unsealed following Jones’ arrest late yesterday in Portland. Prior to mailing the noose, Jones sent hate literature to residents of Lima regarding the shooting of an African American woman by an officer employed by the Lima Police Department. Meanwhile, Upthegrove was advocating at community assemblies and to the media for equal police services for African Americans and speaking out against the hate flyers.

The indictment alleges that Jones used the U.S. Postal Service to send a package that included the noose to Upthegrove’s home for the purpose of intimidating him and interfering with his right to engage in public advocacy for equal police services for African Americans. The two-count federal indictment charges the defendant with interference with federally protected activities and mailing threatening communications. Upthegrove received the noose on Feb. 14, 2008.

"A noose is an unmistakable symbol of hatred and violence in our nation, conjuring up images of a despicable period in our history. Mailing a noose to an individual who advocates for racial equality sends a clear threat of violence," said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division.

"In our country, the law must protect the rights of free speech and peaceful assembly. When anyone resorts to threats of violence to abridge those sacred rights, the Department of Justice will be there," said U.S. Attorney Steven M. Dettelbach for the Northern District of Ohio.

"The FBI works tenaciously to pursue those who, by their hate-filled actions, threaten the civil rights of our citizens. The mailing of a noose into this community warranted every resource the FBI had to offer, including the outstanding work of our Laboratory Division. The people of Lima should be assured that incidents like this will not be tolerated," said C. Frank Figliuzzi, Special Agent-in-Charge of the FBI’s Cleveland Division.

If found guilty of mailing a threatening communication, Jones faces a maximum punishment of five years in prison and a potential fine of up to $250,000. If found guilty of interfering with federally protected activities, he faces a maximum punishment of one year in prison and a fine of up to $100,000.

The case was investigated by Special Agent Brian Russ of the FBI, in conjunction with Assistant U.S. Attorney David Bauer for the Northern District of Ohio, and Special Legal Counsel Barry Kowalski and Trial Attorney Shan Patel from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

The charges set forth in an indictment are merely accusations and the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • SolarSanitizer
    Sounds like guilty until proven innocent.

    "At the time he mailed the noose for the purpose of threatening Jason Upthegrove, Jones, 32, was a regional director of a group that advocated white supremacist ideology, according to the indictment unsealed following Jones’ arrest late yesterday in Portland."

    This doesn't sound like innocent until proven guilty.

    - SolarSanitizerUS October 8, 2009 3:27PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • ttut21
      Lots of If's

      ""If found guilty of mailing a threatening communication, Jones faces a maximum punishment of five years in prison and a potential fine of up to $250,000. If found guilty of interfering with federally protected activities, he faces a maximum punishment of one year in prison and a fine of up to $100,000.""


      Lots of "If's" in there there is no assumption that he is guilty. They gave when, what, where and why.

      Solar is a White Supremacist!
      (some cyber-trash-talk(( bullying )) from one of the other chats with you)

      - ttut21US October 9, 2009 1:47AM

      Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • SolarSanitizer
        Ugh. : /

        Let me repeat, then... "At the time he mailed the noose for the purpose of threatening Jason Upthegrove,..."

        This, like I opined earlier, sounds like guilty until proven innocent. I do not see the word, "If". I don't see the word "alleged", or the phrase "accused of" or anything resembling the possibility of innocence...

        I quoted a section and commented on it. Why are you pointing to the "ifs" in the part of the piece to which I did not refer?

        For the record, I don't think any white supremacist group would accept me on account of my nationality.

        - SolarSanitizerUS October 9, 2009 9:48AM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • ttut21
          Cyber Bully

          PS...

          Well, I guess we both get to pick and choose which paragraph best fits our view then.

          - ttut21US October 9, 2009 6:56PM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • SolarSanitizer
            Yes we do.

            The parts that you point out correctly convey an innocent until proven guilty attitude. The section I point out clearly suggests guilt. It sets an underlying tone... It is like the "dog whistle" effect. It unfairly predisposes the reader to think "Probably guilty".

            - SolarSanitizerUS October 9, 2009 7:50PM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • K in Newfoundland
    Not in Canada

    Freedom of expression is one thing. Harrassment and criminal behaviour is another. There's not a court up here that would aquit Jones. In fact, he'd be destined to the penitentiary for this cowardly act. And that's the way I like it!

    - K in NewfoundlandCA February 16, 2010 6:34PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...