White House Communications Director Anita Dunn Praises Mao
President Obama's White House Director of Communications, Anita Dunn, is trying to say her graduation speech praising the late Chinese communist dictator Mao Zedong was all "tongue in cheek." Really? Judge for yourself:She says in the clip that the communist leader, the worst mass murderer in human history, is who she "turn[s] to most." In the history of America , I can't think of a single, more radical statement than this one.
The Black Book of Communism, which was edited by Stephane Courtois and a number of fellow French leftists, is the best resource for the crimes, terror, and repression of communism. It is widely respected and viewed as authoritative because no one can impugn the motives--or the careful research--that supports this great work of truth. Here's just one short passage: "Excluding the deficit in births... the loss of life linked to the famine in the years 1959-1961 was somewhere between 20 million and 43 million people. The lower end of the range is the official figure used by the Chinese government since 1988."
Even the communist regime in Beijing acknowledges that 20 million of their fellow Chinese died under the dictatorship of Mao Zedong. Twenty million starved to death in just two years. Have we ever had an administration staffed with people so indifferent to human suffering, so ignorant of history, so simultaneously callow and callous? Where does Obama find these people? Unfortunately, prestigious universities are turning out thousands of them.















White House Communications Director Anita Dunn Praises Mao
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Hmmm...
"President Obama's White House Director of Communications, Anita Dunn, is trying to say her graduation speech praising the late Chinese communist dictator Mao Zedong was all "tongue in cheek." Really? Judge for yourself:"
I listened to it and it seemed that she was not artificially praising Mao. She meant it.
Does she "worship" him as Beck claimed? No. Nothing I saw suggests worship. That is Beck being hyperbolic in his speech.
- SolarSanitizer
October 19, 2009 5:56PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
cretin
That is Beck being hyperbolic in his speech .
so beck is hyperbolic... and in his speech! Now how did Beck get inside his speech?Especially if he is hyperbolic.
Example of a moron trying to be intelligent.
- dingo1 October 21, 2009 2:12AM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Please, folks:
Take it from me...
DNFTT
It is sad. They get dependent on you for their intellectual beat downs and before you know it, you have to claim them on your taxes .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_ (Internet)
- SolarSanitizer
October 21, 2009 2:37AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
ROFLMAO
An intelligent Moron - must be a new species
- OhForTheLoveOfGod October 23, 2009 3:20PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
I've judged it
No one in our government should be citing Mao in any venue especially a high school . The man was a mass murderer of over 40 to 60 million people. If I would have been at that event, I would have marched my kids out of there. Disgusting.
- OhForTheLoveOfGod October 23, 2009 3:19PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Yes Beck, Fox and you have judged.
The YouTube Clip is from Fox opinion news, who knows what they have pasted together. Beck is and has been wrong with facts a lot of the time. I don't want to spend a lot of time researching this it's not worth it but let me point out. Many of our founding fathers and government leaders who are held in reverence by many people did a nice job of stealing this country from the Indians. They came close to eliminating a complete race of people. Mao made many statements that are useful and accurate as did our founding fathers but I agree that does not make them good people. Lastly to clarify one final fact, my relatives came to the New World in the mid 1700's and I completely understand the wrongs that were done by them. To sum up China is not perfect but is becoming a great county, Anita Dunn is not perfect but I have never heard her suggest a military overthrow of our government, I have watched Glenn Beck advocate a radical military overthrow of our government. Who should we charge with treason?
- Super Expert
November 21, 2009 5:11PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Mother Terresa
So Mr. Beck finds that her comparison of Chairman Mao and Mother Terresa to be an accurate one?
Though a genocidal monster Mao was also a skilled politician and is often recommended for those studying the political arts (like Machiavelli)
- MrBook
October 19, 2009 6:22PM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
On that note...
Would you recomend Hitler, also? Would you use Mao and Mother Teresa in the same sentence, as did Mrs. Dunn?
What about Hitler and Mother Teresa? Would you use them in the same sentence like she did?
The bonus question, completely off topic:
When will dingo1 point out that I used hyperbolic as an adjective used to describe Beck?
- SolarSanitizer
October 19, 2009 6:56PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
propoganda
If we are talking about propaganda and imagery then yes, I would recommend studying Hitler, and Goebbels as well. Both were master propagandists and manipulators of the public perception.
- MrBook
October 19, 2009 8:50PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
What if we were
What if we were talking about "favorite political philosophers" like Mrs. Dunn was, instead of other random topics, like propaganda and imagery.
Would you then?
- SolarSanitizer
October 19, 2009 9:01PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
favorite
The White House Director of Communications would not admire a master propagandist?
Are your favorite political philosophers just ones that you completely agree with?
- MrBook
October 20, 2009 5:56AM
Reply to this Recommend
(2)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
A good point
And she's not saying that she admires what he did as leader of the country, or even how he became leader. Sounded to me like she was saying she admired that he challenged his party, challenged conventional ideas of how to gain power and overcame outrageous odds. Those are all admirable characteristics. I admire Hitler as one of the greatest most influential public speakers in history and have even studied his speeches for my own public speaking. That doesn't mean I approve of what he did.
Her lame "I was kidding" response sucks though.
- State of Reason
October 21, 2009 11:50AM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Huh?
According to your way of thinking I guess I should look To Jeffrey Dahmar if I want to study someones meat cutting skills.
- OhForTheLoveOfGod October 23, 2009 3:26PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
cutting?
If he was known as being skilled at cutting the sort of meat you were interested in cutting.
As has been noted elsewhere she is praising Mao for challenging his own party, not for things like the cultural revolution or the the mass murder .
- MrBook
October 23, 2009 7:54PM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
incredible admiration
Mao's crackpot economic notions, notably the infamous 1958 Great Leap Forward, created famines that killed 20-36 million Chinese peasants. Mao's aides dared not tell him millions were starving. Red Emperor Mao was prodigal with his people's lives, and, according to aides who were close to him, was shockingly indifferent to their suffering.
Someone to be admired!
- CitizenZebra
October 19, 2009 7:56PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Random, but
I thought she was interim communications director, it's been almost 6 months. How long does it take to find a communications director?
Anyway, give her the benefit of the doubt. Her explanation seems silly, but it's not entirely implausible. If she did things like praising Mao or Lenin on multiple occasions it would be a different matter, but one comment which could arguably be a joke (I guess they did laugh in the video ?) shouldn't justify us labeling someone as supporting Mao's policy. Any, "favorite" philosopher is a term that isn't clear endorsement anyway since Mao is actually a really interesting political philosopher to read. If I were going to say "favorite" I picked someone like Locke, Kant, or Mill - but it's still interesting to read Mao's stuff even though I don't agree with it.
- caelum
October 20, 2009 1:24AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Anita Dunn , Mao, & Kickball??
Anita,
I'm not certain you will remember me, or the "incident", but many years ago when we were children you stopped a kickball game during which I was on third base and ready to score! This cessation of probable success at these tender early formative years inflicted tremendous psychological damage to me during my life. Yet, more importantly, thanks to Glenn Beck , I now realize in fact this was a first red flag of an encroaching communistic ideal setting precedence in our country - that long ago! (A Mao Zedong tactic I am sure!
;-) ..
Hehehe .. (what a silly & insulting analogy he used .. "kickball" .. sigh .. ) I think Glenn Beck is jealous of the fact that you are still gorgeous and a knockout .. while he is hanging on to little hair, low levels of testosterone, and a capitalistic greed that is so representative of what has ruined many good things in our country! ;-)
Lol ..
A Dejected Kickballer
- albertcamus44
October 20, 2009 3:55AM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Political Heros
This many months after June 5th the Family Research Council has suddenly decided an Obama polical functionary is dangerous because she admires cold tough leadership. Since they are by now getting exposed to more challenging ideas, and hopefully figuring out on their own who to admire, would you offer Machiavelli, Rove, Reid, Cheney - while not in a position to cause millions to die, cold tough leaders who advocated ruthless adhearance to their ideals.
- lily
October 20, 2009 12:31PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Machiavelli
I don't recall him saying that a leader should be cold or ruthless or require adherence to their own ideals. He said rulers should err on the side of justice, and that they should prefer fear to love - so long as they were not hated - and on the contrary, he said that an emperor must not only permit his imperial subjects to retain their customs, but that he should live among them himself if possible.
To be fair, however, Ms. Dunn said she turns to Mao and Teresa most frequently when discussing that particular concept, not in general. I wasn't sure whether her reverence was qualified at first, but the pattern of her speech is akin to that of Obama's (teleprompter-ridden).
- JKM121
October 22, 2009 7:22AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Irony
Dunn's pairing of an "evil" individual, Mao, with the "good" of Mother Theresa already lets us know that something ironic is up. Dunn calls attention to the irony by telling us these two figures are not usually put together.
She, perhaps too subtlety for some, refers to them both as her favorite political philosophers, again giving us ironic context clues. One might fault her for insensitivity (as irony often is) or for failing to recognize that her audience was broader than (and maybe not as clever as) a group of college students, teachers, etc.
And, intent is always hard to fix, especially at a (mediated) distance.
Irrespective, no one is completely "good" or "evil," and there are lessons to be learned everywhere. That Mao or Hitler or Goebbels used their immense abilities to perpetrate atrocity is one of the great political lessons to be learned. Ability alone can be a very dangerous thing, indeed.
- shanahan
October 21, 2009 12:02PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
What was ironic about it?
Pairing Mother Teresa with Mao is only ironic if you assume that Mao was evil. She gave no indication in the submitted clip that she thought Mao was evil, so there's no reason to assume she's being ironic. Her point, that your choices are your own, could have been illustrated by any number of historical figures; she gave no hint of her reason for choosing Mao.
The only two reasons I can think of are:
(A) She really does admire Mao, or
(B) She wanted to annoy people who view Mao negatively.
Neither reason leads me to think well of her.
- fsilber
October 21, 2009 1:19PM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Beck, Fox Opinion and Dun
The YouTube Clip is from Fox opinion news, who knows what they have pasted together. Beck is and has been wrong with facts a lot of the time. I don't want to spend a lot of time researching this it's not worth it but let me point out. Many of our founding fathers and government leaders who are held in reverence by many people did a nice job of stealing this country from the Indians. They came close to eliminating a complete race of people. Mao made many statements that are useful and accurate as did our founding fathers but I agree that does not make them good people. Lastly to clarify one final fact, my relatives came to the New World in the mid 1700's and I completely understand the wrongs that were done by them. To sum up China is not perfect but is becoming a great county, Anita Dunn is not perfect but I have never heard her suggest a military overthrow of our government, I have watched Glenn Beck advocate a radical military overthrow of our government. Who should we charge with treason?
- Super Expert
October 21, 2009 1:08PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Military overthrow is your basis?
Our current government was founded on military overthrow. I believe it was beneficial to the people. Every independence day in every country is a celebration of military overthrow. When the government builds too much power as governments always eventually do, the only way to give power back to the people is revolution. So you're saying that now that the government has more power than ever the suggestion of a revolution is bad???
- sunshiner424
October 21, 2009 3:00PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Ok so you are saying Mao was correct in what he did?
Not to get off the subject but since this article is from the family research council.
Just Exactly Who is The Family Research Council?
I just made a long call to the Family Research Council in Washington DC, I was interested in possibly supporting them, I agree on many of the positions they claim to represent. I am setting here very disappointed, to use mild comparisons they appear to be modern day Pharisees and Sadducees. For you non Christians they may be people who have hidden motives and are not who they claim to be. It is impossible to determine who or where there funding comes from. For all we know they could be funded by interests in China who wish to have much more control over the USA. The Fact is we just don’t know who the money comes from or if they have hidden motives. Do any of you know exactly who there money comes from? Please don’t use the Evangelical Council as a resource to find more on this subject, you will get only general meaningless data from them. How about it Family Research Council, give us a list of your top twenty contributors and there amounts.
- Super Expert
October 21, 2009 3:18PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
ahem
Why don't you tell me? Did I say Mao was right in whatever stupid laws he made that resulted in millions of deaths ? Did I? Oh... you thought I did? You... you really... thought.... HAHAHA hilarious.
(If you can be petty and demeaning, so can I.)
Btw, I don't give a crap about the family research council. I saw the clip somewhere else, I follow OV, and I commented for the sake of intelligent debate.
- sunshiner424
October 21, 2009 3:31PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Keep the sun shining
I'm not saying that you said anything. What you wrote left me wondering so I asking a question. I don't think anything about you this is the internet and at times there is little fact here. I am definitely not your accuser, your may be a great person.
- Super Expert
October 21, 2009 5:55PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
military
The government was hardly founded on a military overthrow. The military component of the Revolution did not come until after the colonial governments voted to break with England. Even throughout the Revolution it remained a civilly led rebellion, with each colony raising solders to serve in the Continental Army.
The celebrations that take place on the 4th commemorate the military victory over the British Army, but without the Second Continental Congress there would have been no army to fight the British.
- MrBook
October 21, 2009 6:46PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Yup
You're right, I substituted violent with military . I don't know history well enough to debate this topic so I'm just going to say I took the original statement to mean violent so whether my comment still applies or not is opinion.
- sunshiner424
October 21, 2009 6:58PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Anita Dunn
Interestingly, a few conservative Christians have cropped her remarks to say something different than she actually said. Videos show her saying Mother Theresa and Mao are "the two people that I turn to most." What she actually said was that they are "the two people that I turn to most to basically deliver a simple point, which is, you're going to make choices."
I find it of note that some of my Christian brethren are diligent about 9 of the 10 Commandments, but feel that bearing false witness is okay as long as they believe it to be in the service of the Lord.
- Burr Deming
October 21, 2009 10:06PM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
check your fact
I think you are just ignorant and arrogant guy who knows nothing about Chinese history or culture. Go to China and ask a kid of 7 year old or a man or a woman of 70 year old about Chairman Mao, and analyze your answers, then make your comment about Mao.
It is an undeniable fact that there is no Chairman Mao, there will be no China as we see today just as there is no George Washington there will be no United States as we know today in spite of the fact that he was a slave owner. Remember the rule, you cannot get out of your time. Being a slave owner does not diminish the greatness of George Washington. Killing a couple of people in a political struggle does not make mao a murderer. How many people did we kill in civil war , or in Iraq. Wake up this is political war. Be respectful. This should be the first lesson you take before you go out of the country.
- dfdanny
October 23, 2009 1:37PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.