The Execution of D.C. Sniper John Allen Muhammad
In this haunting video, Washington Times photographer and videographer Katie Falkenberg records the events leading up to the execution of D.C. sniper John Allen Muhammad. Convicted of six counts of murder, Muhammad maintained his innocence until the state pronounced him dead at 9:11 p.m. EST. His final meal was chicken and red sauce. He chose not to make a final statement.--- See an interactive database of individuals on death row ---













The Execution of D.C. Sniper John Allen Muhammad
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Good Riddance
Good riddance to the garbage that he was!
- david
November 11, 2009 11:41AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
It's a start
Let's expand the death penalty to cover many more crimes. It's time we caught up with the rest of the world and stop coddling criminals. For example, the death penalty is applied in at least 25 other countries for economic crimes such as bribery or corruption of public officials, embezzelment of public funds or theft of public property, currency speculation, fraud, forgery, habitual theft and aggravated theft. Then there are those wise countries that impose the deth sentnce for drug offenses and sexual offenses. Why are we so far behind these enlightened countries such as Nigeria, Pakistan, Sudan, Iran, Kuwait, China, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, South Korea, etc. etc. ?
Either the thugs will be deterred by the penalty if they're caught and the crime won't happen in the first place, or we'll eventually kill off most of the criminals when they are caught. Either way, the crime rate goes down and decent, hard working AMERICANS can live their lives in peace and security.
- mr average
November 11, 2009 12:10PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
oh please.
"For example, the death penalty is applied in at least 25 other countries for economic crimes such as bribery or corruption of public officials, embezzelment of public funds or theft of public property, currency speculation, fraud, forgery, habitual theft and aggravated theft."
Yeah countries like say communist China and Muslim theocracies. Most European countries don't have the death penalty.
Also giving the death penalty for small crimes such as that is insane. It ensures that there will be absolutely no deterrent for the criminal to continue to commit even more atrocious crimes.
- Father Time
November 11, 2009 11:07PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Please please me
"Also giving the death penalty for small crimes such as that is insane. It ensures that there will be absolutely no deterrent for the criminal to continue to commit even more atrocious crimes."
If one of the reasons for having a death penalty is its supposed deterrent effect, don't you think that it would server as a major deterrent for minor crimes? I mean, who would shoplift from a store if they knew that they could be executed for doing so?
The problem is that the public is not made aware enough of the executions that are done. If everyone was able to watch them being carried out - brodcast on TV and having them take place in public - sports arenas, public commons, etc. - then the deterrent effect would be MUCH greater. The problem with the way we kill 'em now is that it's too clean, too sanitized, too hidden from public view. Nobody except the dozen or so witnesses ever experience the reality of the penalty. Because it's so unreal to people, there's no deterrent effect.
- mr average
November 12, 2009 8:25AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
reply
and if a person does shoplift and gets caught what's to stop them from engaging in a shoooouts or killing witnesses. If it was a perfect deterrent we wouldn't have homicide or gangs.
Also public executions didn't work either
- Father Time
November 12, 2009 6:45PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
correction
I meant to say 'engaging in a shootout'
- Father Time
November 13, 2009 4:01AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Mirror, mirror
Read up on:
Caligula,
Hitler,
Stalin,
Pol Pot
(This is just a sampling)
They're views are very similar to yours.
- TheCatholicHeretic
November 14, 2009 2:41PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Doesn't make sense
The death penalty is the most backward thing I can think of.
A) Killing to punish killing simply doesn't make sense.
B) It would be a far worse punishment to live in prison for life than to simply drift off to sleep .
- kylo1
November 11, 2009 12:19PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
So it's fair to
give life in repayment for death?
The death penalty tends to deter more crime as people fear it much more than a prison sentence; with the latter, one has a chance to escape. Death, on the other hand, might be permanent.
- JKM121
November 11, 2009 7:28PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Is that based on opinion?
The death penalty doesn't deter anyone. You can see this in the violence rates. Even though the death penalty is handed out in this country, crime still goes up. It has been going down recently but that is from different factors.
- kylo1
November 11, 2009 7:56PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
hmm...
upon further investigation into the issue, it seems that any correlations that may exist strictly between crime rates and the death penalty are difficult to discern; and you are correct that there are a number of factors that play into a crime rate, the existence of the death penalty notwithstanding. However, that does not detract from the justice of the death penalty, for he who would unjustly deprive another of genuine liberty (perhaps even threatens such), forfeits his own; exceptions abound, for instance in the case of young children .
- JKM121
December 19, 2009 6:02PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
And why not?
A) Obviously one who maliciously murders others for no just reason does not value life.
B) I prefer to be protected, rather than punish.
- pl21224
November 11, 2009 11:20PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
The world is now a better place.
It is too bad that we feel a need for the death penalty . However, Mr. Muhammad, and people like him give rise to the need. It is better to attend to that need.
- truthseeker1
November 11, 2009 1:30PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
america is a blood thirsty genocidal "country.,"
Has anyone ever looked at the list of countries that still subscribe to capital punishment ?
You would see a list of countries that americans refer to as terrorist and rogue nations.
How is america NOT a terroristic or rogue nation?
mark aleshnick
Okinawa, Japan
- mark aleshnick
November 12, 2009 6:28AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
America, NOT a terroristick or rogue nation.
Why aren't we a rogue nation? That is simple. In a rogue nation all it takes to have you sentenced to death and executed is a suspicion of guilt.
Over here it takes eight years, count them EIGHT years of trials, speculation, whining from the anti death party that he doesn't deserve death because he might be innocent, despite massive heaps of evidence that he's not.
I remember when this guy was killing. I was ten. One of the girls he killed was my age, she had just gotten out of school and had sat down next to her dad in the car. He shot her in the heart and never showed any remorse.
She had a future, a chance at life. She could have learned and grown and become a mother , a scientist, a politician. Anything. But he ended her just for the hell of it. Does someone who kills six people, children among them, for no good reason deserve to be allowed to continue at life? Life is a joy no matter where you spend it.
How many criminals ask for the death sentence over life In prison ?
Got what he deserved. My two bits there.
- Nivarion
November 12, 2009 9:24PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
All humans are capable of terroist acts...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_war_crimes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_war_crimes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Army #War_crimes
That's why God said, "You shall not kill."
- TheCatholicHeretic
November 14, 2009 2:48PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.