2012 NBA Draft Review and Analysis: Ranking Every Prospect
I am a self confessed NBA draft junkie. What does that mean exactly?
It means that I am always in the mood to write, project and speculate about the NBA draft. One of my key findings when looking at the draft is that all I needed to build an effective draft model to predict player performance was publicly available on the internet.
Stunning I know. Using this data, I built two models to predict the future performance of NBA draft picks (go here for the model build parts 1 & part 2 ). In very general terms the models use the available data to predict future performance for each player coming into the draft from college. Based on that prediction a ranking is done and a draft recommendation is generated.
In fact, It’s been so successful that I get a lot of requests for it in multiple platforms.
That’s the productivity projection for every draft prospect in Draft Expresses‘ delightful database. This year I’ve tried to cover every eligible prospect for whom any date is available. My plan as always is to continue to monitor these projections in the future.
Let’s review the models real quick for any newcomers. I built two models specifically and I called them : Yogi and Booboo. They both use a series of publicly available factors (WS40, Age,Height, etc.) to project the player’s Wins Produced numbers for the duration of a player’s rookie contract in different ways. Yogi gives the go ahead for drafting at .095 projected WP48 and Boo Boo does the same at .067 WP48
A simple test for the models is to look at correlation between the place the player was picked, where the models suggested picking him and actual rank by draft in terms of production. Draft order vs production shows minimal correlation with an R-square of about 5% . It jumps to 25% for the predicted production rank.
A more complex and interesting test is to look at:
- The probability of landing a better than average player (>.090 WP48)
- The probability of landing a good player (>.150 WP48)
If I do this for all picks by the Models as well as all draft picks and Model picks taken after the top 5 picks I get:
So to review, using publicly available data we built a model that picks draft winners at a 75% rate which is better in general than having the #1 pick in the draft and big winners at a 40% rate which is better than everything but the #1 pick.
But you’re not really here for the science are you? Let’s give you the money shot.
That’s all the prospects sorted by their Draft Express rankings of 6/25/2012. Just to make it easier for everyone. Let’s do some takeaways shall we?
- Anthony Davis is really,really,really good. He does not have the highest projected score in my database. He has the third highest in 18 years. He is 19 years old. Most important #1 Pick since Tim Duncan.
- The Spurs knew something (they always know something) . The Spurs trading away a late first rounder (where they typically kill it) to get rid of Richard Jefferson should have been a clear sign. There are 18 players getting the approval of the draft model, 10 of them are either available in round 2 or as undrafted players. Any takers on at least a few winding up in San Antonio?
- Teams are getting smarter. Overrated prospects like Andre Drummond are slipping down draft boards. Guys like Bradley Beal are moving up (good news for my old friends in Washington) . It’s surprising to me that the top 6 looks solid outside of the Harrison Barnes (Mr. Overrated 2012 himself) at number 5 for the Kings.
- There will be some real steals in this draft. Jared Sullinger will slip too far (hopefully far enough to wear green and white). Will Barton and Jae Crowder will add real value to round 2.
- There is a lot of talent going undrafted in this draft William Mosley, Jesse Sanders, Ken Horton (who doesn’t even have a full Draft Express Profile), Marcus Denmon and Ricardo Ratliffe are all guys that may be lighting it up either in Europe or on the Spurs in the future.
That should tide you over for a bit.
Of course, there is more to come.
Get more great analysis over at Wages of Wins Journal.