Quantcast
Guns

Tennessee Bill to Allow Guns in Cars Passes Senate Committee

article image

Yesterday, Senate Bill 3002, the NRA-initiated Safe Commute Act, passed in the Senate Judiciary Committee by a 6 to 1 vote, with two members voting to "pass" on the bill.  Senate Bill 2992, the Firearm Discrimination Prevention Bill intended to bolster the ultimate implementation of SB 3002, passed in the Senate Commerce Committee by a vote of 6 to 3.  Both of these important bills will soon be sent to the Senate floor for a vote.

SB 3002 prevents employers, other property owners and government entities from prohibiting Tennesseans from storing their legally possessed firearms out of sight in their locked private vehicle, as long as the vehicle is authorized to be on the property.  This would ensure that gun owners are able to defend themselves during their commute.  Current parking lot prohibitions disarm good citizens during their entire commute and this is a dangerous injustice that must be ended.  The second bill, SB 2992, prevents employers from discriminating against employees or prospective employees based upon whether they choose to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

(Gallery: Most popular guns in America)

Attached to SB 3002 were two amendments, both proposed by the bill sponsor, Senator Mike Faulk (R-4).  The first would exempt (from the bill's provisions) the grounds of occupied single-family detached residences, nuclear power generating plants, and science and energy national laboratories operated by the federal Department of Energy.  The other amendment limits the protections offered in the bill to those gun owners who have a valid concealed handgun permit or those gun owners 21 years-old or older who have a valid Tennessee hunting license.  While these amendments do limit the proposed benefits of the original legislation, they were intended by the sponsor to improve the prospects of the legislation ultimately being enacted into law.  Senator Faulk did a masterful job of defending the bills against attack during the committee hearings. 


The opponents claim that the Safe Commute Act violates private property rights.  The truth is that the legislation finds the perfect balance between the private property rights of vehicle owners with the rights of parking lot owners.  It can be said that these rights intersect literally where the rubber meets the asphalt.  While the opponents may not consider the right to self-defense an important factor in finding this balance, proponents do.  To learn more about the private property rights interests involved with this legislation, click here. is absolutely critical that you contact your state Senator TODAY and ask that he or she strongly support SB 3002 and SB 2992!  Hearing from many constituents is one of the only ways that legislators will find the courage to stand up against anti-gun big businesses and in favor of the self-defense rights of law-abiding citizens.  Every individual constituent contact is more important than you might imagine.  Contact information for your state Senator can be found here.

Get More:

Comments

mikehussy's picture

This is a very informative

This is a very informative post; I have read very few articles on the web just like this one and I am surely going to share it with my friends so they will also get awareness.Honda CR-V For Sale | Honda CRV For Sale

Olderman's picture

"...The opponents claim that

"...The opponents claim that the Safe Commute Act violates private property rights..."

Just were does any property owner, private or business, have the police power to search anyone's vehicle? If a business suspects an employee of theft or some other illegal activity, call the police. The employer has no legal power or permission to search anyone's vehicle just because. If an employer has reason to believe that an employee is committing a crime, then the legal action is to detain and call the police.

I do realize that many employees are caught between a rock and a hard place when it comes to the job. If you know in your heart that your employer will find a way to fire you if you refuse him access to your locked vehicle, that is a powerful motivation.

Yet, that is just what many employers will do to establish a precedent: and why it is important to always be flexible about who you work for. In my mind, allowing an employer to bully anyone into what amounts to an open ended blanket search just because is just plain wrong: as is the employer for attempting such a search.

Wayne Crawford's picture

The 4th Amendment only

The 4th Amendment only applies to the government. Private property owners can make the search of vehicles and bags or purses a precondition to entering or using their property. This is not illegal.

As a private security officer, I have worked for one client who searched each employee and their bags/purses, both into and out of the workplace. The client was UPS.

Olderman's picture

Then, it seems, that yet

Then, it seems, that yet *another* law is needed. Yet, I wonder if the binding of a signed contract specifying an employer's privilege to search carte blanche can stand before the right of an individual to be secure in his papers and property.

I know, you can always go somewhere else.....

Close x
Don't Miss Out! |
Like us on Facebook?