Now Pro-Gun Judges Won't Even Listen to NRA
By Dennis Henigan
It is hard to find a federal judge more friendly to “gun rights” than Judge Sam Cummings of Lubbock, Texas. Yet even Judge Cummings refuses to follow the NRA off the cliff of Second Amendment extremism.
Judge Cummings achieved iconic status in the “gun rights” community in 1999 when, in U.S. v. Emerson, he became the first federal judge to rule that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to possess guns for private purposes. That ruling, literally, was unprecedented. It also was out of step with the Supreme Court’s view of the matter, reflected in a 1939 opinion that since the “obvious purpose” of the Second Amendment guarantee was “to assure that continuation” of a “well regulated Militia,” the Amendment “must be interpreted and applied with that end in view.” At the time of his ruling, no federal Circuit Court had read the Amendment as conferring a right divorced from the militia purpose.
Indeed Judge Cummings was sufficiently committed to a broad reading of the Second Amendment that, in the Emerson case, he dismissed the indictment of a very dangerous man for possession of a gun while subject to a restraining order. Timothy Joe Emerson had issued death threats against his estranged wife and her boyfriend, as well as pointing a Beretta pistol at his wife and their daughter during an argument. Judge Cummings, nevertheless, came down foursquare for Emerson’s constitutional right to be armed.
As is now well known, Judge Cummings’ unprecedented view of the Second Amendment was endorsed by the Supreme Court nine years later in District of Columbia v. Heller, in which the High Court, in a 5-4 decision, defied its own precedent in reading the Amendment to confer an individual right unrelated to militia service. Since Heller, the National Rifle Association and other “gun rights” groups have launched a massive legal offensive against existing gun laws (while at the same time arguing that we need to “enforce existing laws” instead of enacting new ones).
Given Judge Cummings’ record in gun cases, it is obvious why the NRA chose his court to file a constitutional challenge to the Texas law setting 21 as the minimum age to carry a concealed weapon in that State. Crime statistics show that arrests for murder and manslaughter peak at age 18, but the NRA was undeterred in arguing that 18-year-olds have a constitutional right to carry concealed and loaded handguns in public places.
The NRA’s lawsuit became an embarrassment early on, when it was revealed that the NRA had recruited as thenamed plaintiff (and poster boy for teen concealed carry) a young man who had a propensity to post on Facebook his favorite violent phrases and quotations (e.g. “After hunting men, nothing can compare.”). After his infatuation with violence was exposed by the Brady Center, his utility to the NRA abruptly ended and he was dropped from the lawsuit.
The NRA’s biggest problem, though, was that Judge Cummings was careful to read the Supreme Court’s Heller opinion and understand that it does nothing to support the gun lobby’s constitutional extremism. Much to the NRA’s chagrin, Judge Cummings emphasized that the right recognized in Heller was, in his words “quite narrow,” finding that “the Second Amendment does not confer a right that extends beyond the home.” Judge Cummings cited the legion of other post-Heller rulings also confining Heller’s scope to the possession and carrying of guns within the home. Not only did the NRA’s handpicked federal judge find no constitutional right for an 18-year-old to carry handguns in public, he found no such right for anyone to do so. It is also worth noting that, four months ago,Judge Cummings rejected another NRA lawsuit and upheld the federal ban on gun dealer sales of handguns to persons under 21 years of ago, a restriction that obviously impacts the freedom of young people to have a gun inside the home for self-defense.
These Texas rulings are just the latest in a series of painful courtroom setbacks for the gun lobby. A Republican-appointed judge recently upheld the Obama Administration’s modest regulatory effort to curb gun trafficking to Mexico against gun industry attack, and the D.C. Circuit, in an opinion by Reagan-appointee Douglas Ginsburg, rejected the NRA’s challenge to the District of Columbia’s current gun registration system and its assault weapon ban.
These gun lobby legal defeats underscore how much the NRA and its gun industry funders are dependent for their success on the tactics of political threats and intimidation. In too many legislative bodies, including the U.S. Congress, those tactics have often prevailed. A federal courtroom, however, is a far different forum, in which threats of reprisal have no place and advocates are required to offer facts and reasoned argument in support of their positions.
When the task is persuasion, instead of intimidation, the gun lobby has been firing blanks.
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter
Sign-Up Now for the Opposing Views Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter
Do guns make us safe?
Woman kills her returning rapist with shotgun
Woman Shoots Would-Be Rapist
Cocoa Store Owner Shoots Robber
Okla. mom Sarah McKinley defends her infant sons life from armed intruders
Woman Uses .22 Pistol to Shoot & Kill Invader
84-year-old Cincinnati man uses gun to defend himself during home invasion
Licensed gunpacker at GAS STATION shoots to defend himself
Mom with Ohio concealed handgun license fires gun to ward off sex offender's violent attack
Woman kills her returning rapist with shotgun
Pizza Guy Pulls Gun on Robber
Man at ATM Shoots Armed Robbers
Woman who shot 12-year-old won't face charges, but boy will
Concealed Carry works
Gun Owners Busy Shooting Thugs in Toledo
It was them or my family
Dont bring a knife to a gunfight
Appalachian School of Law shooting
A principal and his gun
Armed 11 year old Girl Defends Home from 3 armed Burglars: Armed Citizen
Texas 15 Year Old Defends Self, Sister; Shoots Burglar
Child Shoots Intruder - Port Allen, LA
Boy Uses Dad's AR-15 to Shoot Invader
Houston Self Defense Shooting CCW
Tire Shop Robber Shot by Armed Citizen (TX)
Shot Boy 11, Shoots Illegal Alien Home Invader
Woman Speaks Out After Shooting Attackers
Police: Shooting Was Self-Defense
Man Stops criminal with his concealed handgun
Woman kills her returning rapist with shotgun
84-year-old Woman Shoots Intruder
Elderly Apartment Owner Shoots Invader
Kentucky Homeowner Shoots Would-be Thief
Armed Pastor Holds Crooks at Gunpoint for Police
Kid Shoots Home Invader
Metro Mom Kills Home Invader
FoxNews: Pregnant Mom Holds Burglar at Gunpoint
HOME INTRUDER IS FATALY SHOT 10PM
89-Year-Old Fires Gun at Intruder
Woman In Home Kills Intruder
Man Fires Shotgun to Kill Home Invader
Man Shoots And Kills Intruder
Gun Owner Kills Burglar
Resident Kills Intruder, Wounds Another
Chicago Elderly Kills Intruder With Handgun
71-year-old homeowner shoots burglar
69-Year-Old Shoots Home Intruder
Armed Samaritan Thwarts Bank Robber
Man Shoots Armed Robbers
Woman Shoots Crazed Gunman at Mega-Church
Ailing Elderly Man Shoots Robber
Another 911 Caller Shoots & Kills Intruder
Texas Father Protects Family, Kills Intruders
Man Uses Handgun to Protect Home
Houston Self Defense Shooting CCW
Ambushed Dad Shoots Back at Robbers
Security Video: Woman With Gun Shoots Robber
Armed Customer Shoots Knife-Wielding Man
Man at ATM Shoots Armed Robbers
Good reason to be armed...
Armed Citizen Halts Liquor Store Robbery
Good Samaritan Kills Woman's Attacker
Liquor Store Owner V Armed Robber
Robber killed by clerk, robber's accomplice charged with it
Robber's Victim Pulls His Own Gun
Man Uses Shotgun to Protect Home
Man's Shooting Spree Thwarted by Armed Citizen
Gas Station Clerk Fires Gun at Robbery Suspects
Woman Uses Handgun to Shoot Invader
Armed Citizen Shoots Violent Ex-Boyfriend
Clerk Shoots Armed Robber
Gunfight Caught on Tape: Store Owner vs. 2 Armed Robbers
Robber Gets Shot By Clerk
Having guns doesn't mean you can rob everybody
Man Shoots Home Invader
Home Intruder Fatally Shot & killed by elderly man During 911 Call
Armed Beauty Queen Fatally Shoots Intruder in Florida Home Invasion
Man with concealed-carry permit kills robbery suspect in Cleveland
teen robber shot by Wal-Mart shopper
Richmond Store owner grateful for man who shot robber
Would-Be Robber Fatally Shot
Pizza Delivery Man Shoots, Kills Robber
Man Shoots, Kills Robber
Dunkin' Donuts robbery suspect dies after being shot
Customer shoots, kills robber at L.A. Tan
Clerk Who Shot Robber Acted in Self Defense
Man who shot robber a hero
Diner owner shoots robber in self defense
Clerk says he shot robber in self-defense
Church's customer shoots robber in neck
Beach pizza shop owner fatally shoots robber, police say
The title of this article is a load of crap. ONE judge does not 'judge(S)' make.
Mr. Henigan: How do I know when you are lieing? It's 'cause your lips are moving!
MikeS
"... finding that “the Second Amendment does not confer a right that extends beyond the home..."
It never ceases to amaze me how anyone can take any document/opinion/decision and by careful extract of isolated sentences arrive at the conclusion that is wanted to begin with.
"Held:
1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home...." Source is District of Columbia v. Heller.
I find that jurist who will not adhere to or consider the holding(s) of case law are making their decisions based on politics and emotion. Not historical usage, not the holdings of the Supreme Court.