Quantcast
Health

Paragould, Arkansas Police to Check Everyone's ID in 2013

article image

Paragould, Arkansas has only 25,000 people, but is one of the most dangerous towns in America.

According to statistics from city-data.com, Paragould has had a property crime index rating that is more than double the national average since 2007. Rapes, burglaries, thefts and assaults are also above the national average.

At a town hall meeting, last Thursday, Mayor Mike Gaskill and Police Chief Todd Stovall endorsed a plan to send police in SWAT gear and carrying AR-15s into downtown Paragould starting in 2013, reports the Paragould Daily Press.

Chief Stovall told the Paragould Daily Press: "This fear is what's given us the reason to do this. Once I have stats and people saying they're scared, we can do this. It allows us to do what we're fixing to do."

"If you're out walking, we're going to stop you, ask why you're out walking, check for your ID. To ask you for your ID, I have to have a reason."

"Well, I've got statistical reasons that say I've got a lot of crime right now, which gives me probable cause to ask what you're doing out. Then when I add that people are scared…then that gives us even more [reason] to ask why are you here and what are you doing in this area."

Mayor Gaskill added: "They may not be doing anything but walking their dog, but they're going to have to prove it."

Chief Stovall explained how martial law will work under his Street Crimes Unit: “We will be asking for picture identification. We will be ascertaining where the subject lives and what they are doing in the area. We will be keeping a record of those we contact."

Get More:

Comments

coachroach's picture

Rand Paul needs to step down

Rand Paul needs to step down so we can get someone with some ethical sense to take his place. The rising star has turned into a shooting star that just hit the ground. There is only 1 avenue to becoming a citizen and that is to get the permit before coming into the country. These illegals need to be sent back where they came from and , like all the other cheaters, they need to have a asterisk now added to their bio data, like all the other cheaters. Then, they need to be sent back to where they came from and given a added penalty of having to wait a minimum of 3-5 years before they can even reapply for permission to come back into the country. And, if they have a egg pack, they can take the egg pack with them. We need to send a clear message. The law is the law. We already have the avenue to come into this country, and there wont be any shortcuts. I am a baseball fan, and I really like A-Rod and Manny Remirez, and I hoped they might one day break the all time home run mark. They broke the rules, and they got an asterisk. We don't tolerate cheaters. These illegal immigrants are no different. They took the steroid route, and they now need to be penalized and sent to the back of the line where they belong. We don't need to recognize someone who breaks our rules, and we don't need to build a new road for them. We already have the avenue, and it is our law. If they cant respect our laws, they need to be penalized. Send them to the back of the line, and make them wait a few extra years, and give them a asterisk. If they come back into the country and get caught again, they should be banned permanently from coming back. We don't build new roads for people who break our laws. Rand Paul, if you don't have respect for our laws, if you cant uphold the oath that you took when you became a pubic servant, you need to take a hike too. We don't build new roads for cheaters. The avenue already exists. If you cant take the right road, stay out of this country. Get them illegals and send them back where them came from. You go smokie !!!!!

coachroach

Quisno's picture

Huffington post is Liberal

Huffington post is Liberal controlled. Truth escapes them most of the time. Savanah and CoachRoach have chased this subject into many corners. Since JF Kennedy our presidents have been by large part slected for us. You ever hear of hegelian Dialectic? I would suggest both of you study the teachings of Saul Alinsky for his greatest Student was Barak Hussein Obama. http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm

Rahm Emanuel was another of his better students. Now when arguing war as well as immigration one must understand the plans of those behind Presidents.

Our (10) Bill of Rights are either under attack or are now useless. Our only cantact to the Original federal Constitution is with the supreme Court. Today the rights are missunderstood by the American people. But to understand what has happened one must be due dilligent and study the causes of our Republics demise. How can i introduce to you the meaning of this republic as it is supposed to stand,and how can i tell you of the miss uses of it By a Federal government who has been constantly guilty of spiriting its nature away?

you live a lie of a supposed Democracy when in fact you are now in a hard fascist state.Corporations control your government. Thier prime purpose you can read in the book 1984. Wars that these people fight using our soldiers are for the control of a world for them not us. Oil,Food,Medicine,and others likeenergy all controlled so that the people are under these Corporate entities.

immigration is meant to decrease your potential to aquire work as well as increrase our Welfare debt. the removal of key enterprizes. Our War effort now made in China tags placed on them. Our food from south america,and our fuel from abroad when in this nation we have fields of food potential and fields of oil 5 times that of the North African oil fields. the plan for Oil Cartel to own most of the Oil reserves in the world and the destroying of any ability of the people to invent new ways to provide that energy.

A Police State forming which now in most municipalities can whisk anyone they want to a secret location and murder them if they so please. Military and police were set upon first AL-CIA-da then the Muslim Brotherhood; both of these groups set up in the 1990's for use by the CIA. today that same action is starting to be used against the people who want and own fire Arms And the new move by this Federal government to take that ability way.

Look at England and Australia. Guns Crimes have been supplanted with other tools of killing ; knives crowbars wrenches as well as illegal guns and the people cannot protect themselves. This will become the USA exceptonly worse for Jihadist camps have been allowedinto this country WND news 2011, the constant use of interracial irritants used by Bushes Party as well as obamas party. in this case Republican Democrate isnt one inch different from each other. The 14th Amendment referred to was for blacks to recieve Federal citizenship. but what it did in time was to create federal Citizenship for all people. this is not good when you looking at a building Tyranny. All citizens were to be State Citizens. And when you hear 'I wnat my Constitutional rights' are you asking for the bill of rights in the states or the federal Document which was not supposed to contain them as it enumenrate no laws to the citizens? all you have to do is to study Barron v Mayor of Baltimore 32 US 243 (1833). In District of Columbia v Heller in the court of appeals in 2008, the court ruled that Heller had a second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. as well as rights esteablished by the Bill of rights or Next all should examine United States v Cruikshank 92 US 542 If you need clarification i can do that .

Quisno

coachroach's picture

Normally I dont have much

Normally I dont have much that I like about aggressive police activities, especially when they interfer with the right to move about freely. However, all these government programs and laws protecting people living in the country illegally is just not fair to the good people who respect our laws and have to wait to come here legally. These government programs and policies have run our debt to $16.5 trillion. Under the circumstances, this time I find myself on the side of the police. I know these vietnamese nail salons are full of illegal aliens ! Get the cockroaches, and send them back to where they came from, and let the good people who respect our laws come here instead. You go smokie !!!!!

coachroach

Savannah's picture

According to information

According to information provided by the Congressional Budget Office you're way off track.

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/280288/TAX-CUTS-DEBT.jpg

The Bush era tax cuts, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and dealing with the financial meltdown of 2007 (TARP, Fannie, and Freddie in particular) are the biggest contributors to the US debt by far.

coachroach's picture

Sure, wars cost money, but,

Sure, wars cost money, but, as I recall, there was anthrax floating around in the mail, and the only place they figured had that kind of technology was iraq. And, we had organized groups flying planes into our building, so what do you want to do, nothing ? Those expenses may be necessary. However, we have millions of illegal immigrants here, clogging up our schools, health care facilities, collecting food stamps and other government benefits, and taking jobs away from legal citizens, and funneling money back to their contries, instead of spending it here. That's not to mention the problem with drugs, other crime, and the costs for policing it and throwing them into jails where we still have to feed and house them. The jails are full, and we dont have room for the legal citizens that break the rules. That, my friend, we can do something about. And, by the way, those people that flew into the buildings on 9/11, were they not all illegal aliens ? You go smokie !!!!!

coachroach

Savannah's picture

I didn't say the war wasn't

I didn't say the war wasn't justified, although I don't believe the Iraq war was. I merely pointed out you were a bit off in your claim that illegal immigrants were the cause of our 16 trillion dollar debt.

As for your other claims of what illegal immigrants are doing, to qualify for food stamps and other benefits, one has to prove citizenship. There may be some people who manage to fool government workers with false ID, but I doubt they're making a dent in the overall entitlement budget. If you are referring to children born in this country to illegal immigrants, they're American citizens and just as entitled to healthcare and other benefits as anyone else.

Taking away jobs from legal citizens? Please. I live in a rural state. The only people farmers can get to do the hard farming work are people from other countries. "Real Americans" around here would rather draw benefits from the government than work *that* hard. For the jobs that Americans *would* take if the wages were acceptable, you're blaming the wrong person. The *employer* is the one who opts not to pay a fair wage.

Funneling their money back home to help their starving families instead of spending it here? The amount they make is a drop in the bucket compared to the financial problems that exist because American businesses took their work out of the hands of Americans to the countries where they can pay employees a pittance. It's also a pittance compared to the tax revenue lost because of the corporations, millionaires and billionaires who have their money in off shore accounts.

I'm not saying that illegal immigrants don't utilize some American resources, but most work hard, much harder than many Americans for the money they make. If employers weren't paying them off book, they would be paying taxes as well. Some come here with fake social security numbers and they pay into the system the same as you or I.

While I think we need to deal with the problems in the system, I think it's important to keep in mind that there is more to the picture than what you've painted.

coachroach's picture

Yeah, well we need to change

Yeah, well we need to change that too. Just because a roach gets across the boarder and drops their egg pack, that shouldnt make them a citizen. If the parents arent LEGAL, they shouldnt automatically be a citizen. You just dont seem to have any sense of what is right and wrong, or fair and unfair. We have lots of applicants who respect our laws, who do things the right way. What would you do if you were waiting in line to get something at the store, or waiting to get gas, and everytime you were next a few more jumped in front of you ? We have LEGAL ways for people to come here and work. You know, your heart is going to bleed, and bleed, and bleed, until it's too late. Maybe one day your kid will get caught in the crossfire of a turf war, or maybe your kid will just disappear. Illegle is illegal because they are not legal. When they are not legal, they are CRIMINALS. They are lying, and cheating, they are desparate. Like you, they dont care what is right or wrong, what is fair or unfair. They will sell drugs to your kids, they will even steal your kid and sell your kid. They dont have any conscience, they are like a animal just looking for the next meal, and they dont care what they have to do to get it. Theirs nothing I can say to chisel through that skull of yours. For all I know, your one of them. They are Illegal criminals, and if you're defending them, you dont have any respect for the law either. Smokie, keep checking them IDs, and if they're not legal, get them out of here. Their are plenty of good people waiting in line, trying to do things the right way. You go smokie !!!!!

coachroach

Savannah's picture

Yes, many of the people who

Yes, many of the people who immigrate illegally are desperate. Wouldn't you be if you lived in a place where your family was starving? They're hardly animals, most are not criminals. The only law most of them break is entering the country without permission. Read or watch the news. I read an article just this week that mentioned the Obama administration was trying so hard to keep up their with their quota to get rid of the illegal "criminals" that they were resorting to deporting people who had TRAFFIC violations.

By the way, you're reading more into what I said than is there. I never said I support anyone illegally entering the country. You have been quoting "facts" that are not "facts" and artificially inflating the situation and that was what I was addressing. How can the country have an honest dialog about this issue if people do not discuss it factually and non-emotionally? We have far too many problems that we cannot solve because people are ill-informed and too emotional to discuss things rationally.

"If the parents arent LEGAL, they shouldnt automatically be a citizen."

Perhaps you do not realize the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution GUARANTEES birthright citizenship.

"You just dont seem to have any sense of what is right and wrong, or fair and unfair."

I merely offered facts to counter your emotional rhetoric. Referring to illegal immigrants as roaches is just one example such rhetoric.

"They dont have any conscience, they are like a animal just looking for the next meal, and they dont care what they have to do to get it."

More rhetoric. Do you actually know any immigrants, illegal or otherwise?

"We have LEGAL ways for people to come here and work."

Yes we do. That's a valid point and one with which I agree. *That's* my issue with illegal immigration. It isn't fair to those who apply to come into the country through the proper channels. That doesn't mean I don't feel compassion for all those desperate people who do come here illegally, but there are desperate people in many places in the world. Without some sort of system, the country's economy would collapse.

coachroach's picture

The 14th amendment was

The 14th amendment was ratified 100 years after the the genious minds of our forefathers framed the constitution. It's an amendment. Some bleeding hearts, like yours, got confused, threw together some emotional rhetoric, and turned it into law. The bleeding hearts didnt foresee tens of millions of roaches pouring across our boarders and dropping their egg packs. Simply put, it was an amendment to the original, an amendment. They overlooked something, and it needs to be corrected. I'm fine with the birthright if the parents are legal, and I dont mean if they were legal when they got here either. If the parents were not legal when they dropped the egg pack, the egg pack is not legal either. We need to reammend that one to correct it. If we can amend it and get it wrong, we can amend it and correct it. Fair is fair. If it's not legal, then it is ILLEGAL. and illegal should not give it a birthright. Keep checking them IDs smokie, and if they're not legal, get rid of them. You go smokie !!!!!

coachroach

Savannah's picture

There were many things the

There were many things the forefathers couldn't foresee. That's why they structured a process by which our Constitution could be changed or amended.

The Amendment you have dismissed as being passed by bleeding hearts does more than guarantee birthright citizenship. It's also the Amendment guaranteeing due process as well as equal protection under the law.

Anyone who refers to people as roaches and their children as egg packs can't be too interested in actual discussion, so I'll end my comments here.

coachroach's picture

What equal protection under

What equal protection under the law should be provided to ILLEGAL criminals ? What do they care about law or equal ? They are not Legal. If you are one of them Illegal egg packs, I'm sorry I have offended you. Truth can be a painful reality. The roaches are screwing up everything that made this country the great place it was for over 2 centuries. Now Obama wants to let them cut in line, just give them citizenship, ahead of all the people who do things the right way ? How is that equal ? We dont need garbage like that here, we need the people who do things the right way. I dont like a cheat, and they dont deserve anything. We need to throw them out of here, and any politician that is for giving a cheat citizenship should be thrown out of office. You have no sense of right and wrong. They dont respect our laws, and they dont deserve to be protected by our laws. They deserve to be thrown the hell out of here. They are ILLEGAL CRIMINALS. Smokie, keep checking them IDs; if they're not legal, get rid of them. You go smokie !!!!!

coachroach

lifelongparagouldres's picture

I've lived here since 1963.

I've lived here since 1963. All this is about drugs.no specific kind.Pain pills,meth,even alcohol. The people committing the crimes are out of drugs,steal people's belongings,and then either go to pawn shops or actually trade the stolen items for drugs.Stolen metal is taken to the scrap yard for cash. I've had my house broken in to,I've had lawn furniture and my kids swingset stolen,and I have friends who have had copper and aluminum stolen from their property. The police ,even with a martial law presence ,will not stop this. I have taken photographic evidence of things being stolen out of my yard,hired someone to find out who the person was,gave the police the guys nickname ,his real name and his address. He has never been arrested.These people band together,use stolen IDs,lie for each other,pay innocent and unknowing people to pawn or return stolen items to stores for refunds.This started back when people in this town were so busy having affairs,not caring where their kids were,trying to sta6 afloat in the economy here,basically the same things that happen everywhere in the US. I can tell you too ,when probation and parole officers are at parties doing drugs and get seen by their clients,and have to keep their mouths shut or lose their jobs,does nothing but help the criminals. When public defenders will take bribes to get these people off with a slap on the wrist.When doctors can say their kids who have had car accidents that kill people while the kid was clearly under the influence of drugs but his dad has friends that say he has narcolepsy,well you get the picture.The crimes are on so many levels,the police here for the most part are the good guys,but they can only make an arrest.After that,its out of their hands. The FBI is what's needed here,not martial law. The FBI needs to weed out the criminals in the justice system, before the police have ANY chance of doing their job.

ross80477's picture

I am at a loss as to how the

I am at a loss as to how the police got to the decision to become an occupation force. The citizens have as much responsibility as the police to reduce crime. In a small community you would expect the police and citizens to be working together to solve this problem. What ever happened to the concept of community? If the citizens would spend a bit of their precious time finding out who their neighbors are and calling the police to check out people who "don't belong in the neighborhood" this might well have a good ending. If the police would aggressively respond to investigate those calls, fine, community policing is working. But, it appears the police have decided that they are an occupation force and assume by the announcement of a policy designed to violate the 4th Amendment they can skate on being abusive. If the government really thinks they are omnipotent, then let the ACLU own another small town.

notsofast's picture

I understand your point of

I understand your point of view. I also understand your not emotionally involved with this town or any of the people in it. The 90 year old man that was robbed in his home and then shot and killed as the thieves were leaving wasn't you father, grandfather, neighbor or even a friend. I also understand that you don't know any of the men and women on the police force that are willing to lay down on your child and take a bullet protecting them and your not the one that has to knock on a door at 2 am and explain to a wife how her husband was shot and killed as he was getting of work for the $4 in his wallet. I truely understand your point of view, It's easy for me to tell you how and what should be done in your town in Tennessee, I dont have a connection with anyone there. We are a small town and we care for our neighbors and friends, I don't consider a police officer coming up to me on the street and talking to me, harrassing because it's a face we all see from time to time and his tone in his voice isn't threatening at all, and the smile on his face lets me know he is on my side. I know the men and women in uniform in this town, would take that bullet meant for another.

Savannah's picture

Notsofast, are you a police

Notsofast, are you a police officer or public official in Paragould? If not, is someone in your family?

You said, "I also understand your not emotionally involved with this town or any of the people in it."

Being emotional is human. Reacting to a problem emotionally almost always causes problems. We're less rational, our perception narrows, and we're more impulsive. In general, it makes us less likely both to see the whole picture and to examine all our options.

Certainly your town has a problem. If I lived there, I would share your concern. Perhaps you would tell us, what other measures has your town taken to combat this issue? It seems to be an on-going concern.

http://www.city-data.com/crime/crime-Paragould-Arkansas.html

In reviewing the above referenced table, I noticed the crime rate increased dramatically in 2005. Do you have any idea why?

notsofast's picture

Savanna No, Im not a public

Savanna No, Im not a public official nor is my family. I'm just an average joe that cares about the town my children are growning up in. We are a very caring community we are known as the "friendly city" ... In 2005 there was a terrible natural disaster and our town took in some amazing people and word began to spread...

Savannah's picture

Are you referring to

Are you referring to Hurricane Katrina? Nothing else changed between 2003 and 2005 that would have contributed to the increase in crime? No change in the poverty level, no loss of jobs? (I haven't researched it so that's not a loaded question.)

The initial spike in crime statistics for your city was seven-eight years ago. What other less severe actions have the city officials taken to combat this major increase in crime? Have they hired more police? Encouraged more neighbor watch programs?

I read somewhere the mayor of your city said he did not consult an attorney before deciding to take this action. As a taxpayer, are you concerned about the potential lawsuits your city faces should it proceed with this plan of action?

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I only asked about whether or not you were a public official/police officer so that I could better understand your point of view. I wonder, for example, how the individual police officers feel about this mandate.

notsofast's picture

I don't recall anything else

I don't recall anything else that would have contributed to the increase in crime but I'm not someone who could say for sure. I know the police dept has tried other things to reduce the crime in these areas but exactly what all they have done I couldn't say. (foot patrols, bike patrols and extra patrols are some)

Every article I see has a picture of an armor truck or tank with men decked out from head to toe in swat gear. That makes for great reading and does its job in sparking ones interest but that isn't what Paragould has in mind.

I am posting a link to the orginal article (written to sell newspapers)

http://www.paragoulddailypress.com/articles/2012/12/15/top_story/doc50cbbb312e241511092932.txt

SusieQue's picture

Dear Notsofast - First of

Dear Notsofast -

First of all, I appreciate you breaking down the facts into nice pieces of rationalization so us slow folks can grasp the real meaning of this article. Whether or not crime is out of control does not mean police can walk up to citizens walking down the street and demand to know why they are there. Period. This is a violation of our rights. You can't sugarcoat it. There are legal ways and means to combat crime. How about when a homeowner is robbed, you take fingerprints and go after the thieves instead of telling homeowners to just file a police report and collect money from their insurance company. That would sure beat the current system of police doing nothing.

Also, police are suppose to be just that. Police. There shouldn't be a need for them to walk around in full military combat gear....with or without rifles. They shouldn't be "deployed" and in "combat." This isn't a war zone (yet). But also, the US Constitution states that the military should never be on US Soil - yet your words sound more like a Marine Corp than a police dept. Police shouldn't being doing traffic stops with rifles, tazers, handguns, handcuffs and who knows what else, hanging off their belts. Some of them have so much crap wrapped around their waist, they walk this a bear.

Police in Tennessee are fighting each other to pull over vehicles so they can take money. So, my respect for police, mayors, or anyone else who wants to tell me "how it's gonna be" is just is pretty low on the crap-o-meter. If I'm walking my dog at 2am, that is absolutely my business. If every single citizen got up at 2am, and went for a stroll, you'd have no one to protect, now would you? Don't feed us a bunch of rationalization and think we're gonna accept it. BTW, the mayor says the statistics prove this is called for...who the hell came up with the stats...the police and city hall?

And lastly, Americans need to stop allowing gang-bangers to run their neighborhoods. There are many, many real life cases that local neighborhoods took their own areas away from criminals, prostitutes, etc. Get together and video tape them, chase them off - do something. We are suppose to defend ourselves; yet, we've become this CALL 9-1-1 society thinking only cops can make a difference. We have the right to bare arms. Use it.

Thank you for letting me have my say.

"If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything."

SusieQue's picture

Dear Notsofast - First of

Dear Notsofast -

First of all, I appreciate you breaking down the facts into nice pieces of rationalization so us slow folks can grasp the real meaning of this article. Whether or not crime is out of control does not mean police can walk up to citizens walking down the street and demand to know why they are there. Period. This is a violation of our rights. You can't sugarcoat it. There are legal ways and means to combat crime. How about when a homeowner is robbed, you take fingerprints and go after the thieves instead of telling homeowners to just file a police report and collect money from their insurance company. That would sure beat the current system of police doing nothing.

Also, police are suppose to be just that. Police. There shouldn't be a need for them to walk around in full military combat gear....with or without rifles. They shouldn't be "deployed" and in "combat." This isn't a war zone (yet). But also, the US Constitution states that the military should never be on US Soil - yet your words sound more like a Marine Corp than a police dept. Police shouldn't being doing traffic stops with rifles, tazers, handguns, handcuffs and who knows what else, hanging off their belts. Some of them have so much crap wrapped around their waist, they walk this a bear.

Police in Tennessee are fighting each other to pull over vehicles so they can take money. So, my respect for police, mayors, or anyone else who wants to tell me "how it's gonna be" is just is pretty low on the crap-o-meter. If I'm walking my dog at 2am, that is absolutely my business. If every single citizen got up at 2am, and went for a stroll, you'd have no one to protect, now would you? Don't feed us a bunch of rationalization and think we're gonna accept it. BTW, the mayor says the statistics prove this is called for...who the hell came up with the stats...the police and city hall?

And lastly, Americans need to stop allowing gang-bangers to run their neighborhoods. There are many, many real life cases that local neighborhoods took their own areas away from criminals, prostitutes, etc. Get together and video tape them, chase them off - do something. We are suppose to defend ourselves; yet, we've become this CALL 9-1-1 society thinking only cops can make a difference. We have the right to bare arms. Use it.

Thank you for letting me have my say.

"If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything."

SusieQue's picture

Dear Notsofast - First of

Dear Notsofast -

First of all, I appreciate you breaking down the facts into nice pieces of rationalization so us slow folks can grasp the real meaning of this article. Whether or not crime is out of control does not mean police can walk up to citizens walking down the street and demand to know why they are there. Period. This is a violation of our rights. You can't sugarcoat it. There are legal ways and means to combat crime. How about when a homeowner is robbed, you take fingerprints and go after the thieves instead of telling homeowners to just file a police report and collect money from their insurance company. That would sure beat the current system of police doing nothing.

Also, police are suppose to be just that. Police. There shouldn't be a need for them to walk around in full military combat gear....with or without rifles. They shouldn't be "deployed" this isn't a war zone (yet). They don't need to pull mom over with tazers, handguns, handcuffs and who knows what else hanging off their belts like their Dirty Harry.

And lastly, Americans need to stop allowing gangbangers to run their neighborhoods. There are many, many real life cases that local neighborhoods took their own areas away from criminals, prostitutes, etc. Get together and video tape them, chase them off - do something. We are suppose to defend ourselves; yet, we've become this CALL 9-1-1 society thinking only cops can make a difference. We have the right to bare arms. Use it.

Thank you for letting me have my say.

"If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything."

notsofast's picture

http://paragouldpolice.org/pr

http://paragouldpolice.org/press_view.php?id=80

12/16/2012

"Armed Patrol" Clarifications

Recently, an article was written by the Paragould Daily Press regarding our Street Crimes Unit. Following the article's appearance, several questions and concerns have arisen from our citizens regarding the tactics and methods in which the unit would be operating under. At this time, we want to clarify the questions and concerns that are currently circulating in the community.

First, let's look at the purpose of the Street Crimes Unit. The purpose of this unit is to increase police presence in high crime rate areas of the city. These areas are identified by examining reports generated from calls for service, and also from citizens who call the Police Department or City Hall with safety concerns in their neighborhoods. Once an area has been identified as a high crime neighborhood, the select group of officers will saturate the area in an attempt to curb the criminal behavior that is plaguing that particular neighborhood. Officers will accomplish this in a variety of different methods. Officers will be working to identify residents in the affected area so that we can better serve our affected neighborhoods. Most often, this identification process will be nothing more than making contact with a subject, handing them a business card, and asking if they live in the area and if there's anything we can do for them. During hours in which crime seems to be more prevalent (i.e. between the hours of 11pm and 5 am), our process will become more stringent. We will be asking for picture identification. We will be ascertaining where the subject lives and what they are doing in the area. We will be keeping a record of those we contact. The record keeping is two-fold: First, we want to try to keep from over-lapping making contact with the same people multiple times. Once we know where people live, or that they always walk in that particular neighborhood, then we'll not need to repeat that contact. We will not be harassing citizens. Secondly, by documenting those of the criminal element, we have a record of that contact and where/when it occurred. An example of where this will be helpful is if a crime (i.e. burglary, breaking or entering) is reported the next morning. We then have a list of "go-to" suspects to question regarding that incident or incidents.

Another issue that seems to be of concern is the mention of Street Crimes Unit officers carrying AR-15 rifles with them during these patrols. To give a little background information, several of our patrol officers already carry AR-15 rifles in their patrol vehicles. The AR-15 and police work is nothing new. Our Street Crimes Unit will not be wearing them constantly. That would be impractical. As we have stated in our meetings, our main purpose of mentioning this was to prepare our residents in the event that they saw an officer armed with one. When our officers deploy into areas where there is the potential for contacting several subjects in a high-crime area, that is when the potential deployment of AR-15's will occur.

Many citizens, through various media outlets, have expressed a concern about the police "violating rights" or "violating the Constitution". We have to abide by the same rules, regulations, and laws that our citizens do. We are not out to violate anyone's rights. Once we have an area that shows a high crime rate or a high call volume, it is our duty and obligation to find out why this is occurring and what we can do to prevent the trend from continuing. Therefore, identifying subjects in those problem areas help us to solve crimes, and hopefully to prevent future crimes.

In closing, the purpose of the Town Hall meetings is to inform you, the citizen, of a potential solution to combat the increase of crimes, both property related and violent. Understand, crime is fluid and ever-changing. We as law enforcement are forced to change with it. We are making an effort to educate our citizens via the Town Hall meetings about crime statistics in each area of town, crime prevention tips, and the Street Crimes Unit. At each meeting, we welcome questions and/or suggestions. Unfortunately, only 100 residents have taken advantage of the two opportunities we have given thus far. Our hope is for you to attend one of the remaining two meetings this week to hear our plans and so that we may get your input.

Ashen_X's picture

Your post includes the

Your post includes the statement, "We will not be harassing citizens," which is contradicted by the rest of the post.

Claiming that you will not be harassing citizens after describing in detail how you intend to harass citizens is very dishonest.

Wortherthorth's picture

This town is 95% White There

This town is 95% White There will be no hue and cry. This is not profileing or racism. Nothing to see here folks move along, move along. Actually, in theory I would have no problem were it just a presence, and the polite asking of questions, but I have never seen that happen except for the security around the elites. Around common folk, cops forget their manners. Most departments are trained to push your buttons to get you to raise your voice or become "agitated" then they taze your a$$!

Close x
Don't Miss Out! |
Like us on Facebook?