- Home
- Politics
- Entertainment
- Sports
- Health
- Religion
- Society
- Tech
- Money
- People
- Science
- Galleries
NYC Cops Finally Begin Following Marijuana Arrest Laws
By Jacob Sullum
Three months ago, New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly told the city's cops to stop manufacturing misdemeanors by tricking pot smokers into "displaying" marijuana and then arresting them for what would otherwise be a citable offense (possession of up to 25 grams). Since then, according to numbers released today, the number of minor pot busts has fallen by 13 percent compared to the same period last year. That may sound like good progress, except that research by Queens College sociologist Harry Levine, which forced Kelly's hand by highlighting what had been a little-noticed crackdown on pot smokers, indicates that most marijuana possession arrests in New York during the last decade and a half—a lot more than 13 percent—were trumped up in ways that Kelly himself now says are illegal. The Drug Policy Alliance, which published some of Levine's research, says it shows "the vast majority of the marijuana arrests in New York City—up to 75 percent in some precincts—are the result of illegal searches and false charges."
Levine found that the arrests typically emerged from "stop and frisk" encounters during which officers either instructed people to take out their marijuana or removed it themselves. According to Kelly's September 19 directive, "the public display of marijuana must be an activity undertaken of the subject's own volition," and the charge is not legally appropriate "if the marijuana recovered was disclosed to public view at an officer's discretion." After routinely flouting the law for more than a decade, the NYPD must do more than try to follow it a little more often. "The crusade continues regardless of the 13% drop," says Chino Hardin of the Institute for Juvenile Justice Reform and alternatives. "When we see the numbers decrease by 80%, then we will know that the NYPD is meaningfully following and upholding the law."
In September I discussed Kelly's belated acknowledgment of his officers' blatant lawlessness in the New York Daily News:
The number of marijuana possession arrests in New York City from 1997 through 2006—when pot use, judging from the federal government's survey data, did not rise significantly—was more than 10 times the number in the previous 10 years. During Kelly's tenure, the number has averaged 38,835 a year, compared with about 2,260 under Ed Koch, 980 under David Dinkins and 24,775 under Giuliani. Last year, it was 50,383, more than the total number of arrests during the 19 years from 1978 (the year after the Legislature decriminalized possession) through 1996 (the year before the anti-pot crusade began).
This is the sort of trend you'd think the police commissioner would notice. The pot busts are largely an outgrowth of the NYPD's stop-and-frisk program, which focuses on supposedly suspicious individuals in predominately black and Latino neighborhoods. Not surprisingly, the arrestees are overwhelmingly blacks and Latinos and mostly young men....
By the police commissioner's own account, arrests in these circumstances are illegal, which means that most of the 350,000 or so pot smokers busted on his watch were wrongly detained, wrongly jailed, wrongly booked and wrongly saddled with criminal justice records and all the attendant expense, inconvenience and humiliation. In these circumstances, nearly a decade into a pot bust binge overseen by Kelly, asking police to try to follow the law from now on seems rather inadequate.
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter














Comments
It's about time that the NYPD
It's about time that the NYPD stop violating the law. Now, what is necessary is for them to stop arresting those who film police.
Jerome McCollom
It took 13 years of
It took 13 years of prohibition, to find out it was never going to work. They didn't repeal prohibition because booze was determined to now be healthy for people. They repealed it to get rid of all the crime & corruption associated with it.
And all the cost in policing, prosecuting, and imprisoning people.
Would you sentence a guy that offered you a beer from his sixpack to YEARS in prison?
Well before prohibition it would have been legal to offer the beer, but during the 13 years of prohibition, he could have been sentenced to YEARS in prison for offering you a beer.
Now of course it’s legal to again offer your buddy a beer from your sixpack. No prison sentence.
See? The morality of the situation NEVER changed, ONLY THE LAWS!
And since when is having the punishment worse than the offense done any good? Authorities always say how drugs destroy people’s lives, and YEARS in prison don’t?!?!
You can NOT regulate something that is illegal. The only way to regulate something is to legalize it.
Somehow, we haven't learned that lesson on the "War on Drugs" yet.
Around 80% of people in prisons are there for drug related crimes. States are going broke trying to imprison them all. We have the highest rate of people imprisoned in the world. One out of every 100 people are in prison.
Police trying to battle drugs have abused citizens rights to the point of battering ram front doors down to enforce unenforceable laws. And this leads to mistakes & corruption in our police forces. And no knock warrants leads to deaths of sometimes innocent people.
And do I even need to mention strip searching thousands of people, including women & children, sometimes in public? (Whether they needed it or not.)
Police even had to go to multiple agency busts, to keep from having cops rip off dealers for their money, when they had just a couple cops investigating drug cases.
Addicts will commit whatever crimes they have to, in order to get money for drugs.
Disease is spread with dirty needles.
The negatives just go on and on.
All drugs should be legalized.
The knee jerk reaction from people is that everyone would then become an addict. And they think you mean legalized, with no controls.
Everyone didn't become drunks after the repeal of prohibition. And I'm sure that the same is probably true about drugs.
The government has ALL drugs lumped together, like they are all the same, but we all know there is a big difference between some of them.
If they were legalized we could at least get people off the worst of them. Get the freaks that are killing people medicated with something else!
LEGALIZING DRUGS WON’T GET RID OF THE DRUG USERS. That’s not the point of legalizing them.
But it would get the drug money out of the hands of gangs, foreign mobsters, and the rest.
And with taxes it would bring in revenue to pay for programs to control it. And with a new industry we would get much needed jobs created.
And this would get rid of all the other problems associated with them, and it would give us a chance to try to 'control' the problem more, like we have done with alcohol and cigarettes.
We have fought this “War on Drugs” for decades, to continue to do the same thing and expect a different result would be insanity.