Quantcast
Animal Rights

Saving and Protecting the Rare California Wolf

Wolves.

A symbol of wilderness lost, the last gray wolf in California was killed in 1924. The subject of European superstition and viewed as competitors for wild game and a threat to domestic animals and even people, wolves were hunted to oblivion across most of the continental United States.

But wolves are making a comeback. Last December a lone wolf wandered into northern California from Oregon, the first in nearly 90 years. He faces many natural challenges—especially finding a mate!—but his biggest threat is the same human fear, greed and superstition that his distant ancestors faced decades before. Thankfully, though wolves are still far from being a certainty in California, the state’s Fish and Game agency has recommended that wolves, should they return, be protected by California’s Endangered Species law.

Since the 1950s, biologists began to understand wolves’ vital role in maintaining healthy ecosystems. Predation strengthened prey species by weeding out genetically unfit animals and selecting for the strongest to survive and breed. This understanding led to efforts to restore wolves that have brought the species back to several states after decades-long absence.

In Yellowstone, where wolves were reintroduced in the 1990s studies have shown the benefits of predation on not just the wildlife but the entire ecosystem there—even trees! Aspens, once a dominant tree in the park, were nearing elimination due to oversized elk herds that, in the absence of natural predation, lingered along river and stream beds all winter devastating the young aspen shoots. The presence of wolves in winter has forced the elk to keep moving and because they can no longer linger indefinitely on river beds, the aspens are once again growing.

This successful return of wolves has been a cause for celebration amongst most biologists and Americans. Unfortunately, many hunters, unwilling to compete with natural predators for wild game, and ranchers, who fear financial loss, are not happy about the wolf’s return. Calls by their powerful lobbies for wolf trapping, snaring, poisoning and even shooting from helicopters are being heard by state governments.

Caving into pressure from those western state’s lobbies, in May, 2011, the US Congress removed federal Endangered Species Act protection from wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains, leaving the states of Montana and Idaho to “manage” their recently established wolf populations. This unprecedented attack on the nation’s heralded wildlife protection law has had predictable and devastating results. In just a year, Idaho has lost 40 percent of its wolf population to hunting and trapping. Wolf numbers are now estimated at fewer than 600. Meanwhile, Montana is estimated to have killed a third of its wolf population since May, with reports of about 260 wolves killed. State officials there are now moving toward an aggressive anti-wolf policy similar to Idaho’s.

This same mentality poses a threat to Journey and his kin in California. Though there is plenty of room for wolves in California from a biological perspective, his arrival has already sparked fear-mongering by the state’s ranchers and hunters. And our irrational fears are still there too. Just witness the release of the film, The Gray earlier this year, an egregious work of fiction that depicted wolves in much the same way that the movie Jaws depicted sharks—as bloodthirsty man hunters.

The recommendation by the California Department of Fish and Game to assure protection of wolves should they establish a population in the state, is a step in the right direction. It signals that the state may put science and healthy wildlife populations above the greed of hunters and ranchers. Its proposal will be considered by the California Fish and Game Commission, which will decide in October whether to accept the recommendation.

Get More:

Comments

sporg0's picture

If I see any wolves I will be

If I see any wolves I will be sure to conserve them. Conserve their coat for a rug in my living room that is.

CRW's picture

You are the quintessential

You are the quintessential anti-environmentalist. At least you are consistent. Do you belong to the "Pave the Earth," society as well?

DesElms's picture

@CRW: You realize, don't

@CRW: You realize, don't you, that when you respond to him like that, it just eggs him on... plays right into his manipulative hands. [grin]

Gregg L. DesElms
Napa, California USA
gregg at greggdeselms dot com

Veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi.
Veritas nimium altercando amittitur.

sporg0's picture

Having been among

Having been among environmentalists I know exactly what they are about and it has nothing to do with saving the environment. It is about vanity and pretending to care because it is fashionable. Meanwhile they cash mommy and daddies checks, shop at the gap, and buy ipads when no one is looking. Watching those self righteous little pricks have their futures washed down the drain is a pleasure.

Corporations pick up the green flag when it is convenient to do so for the purpose of displacing locals who are using natural resources that they want to secure for themselves. The laws are always carefully crafted to allow corporate operations to continue while cracking down on individuals utilizing the same resources. Then folks like you wring your hands and wonder why said resource continues to deplete. Complete tools.

CRW's picture

You are an ignorant jack

You are an ignorant jack ass.

I don't know how old you are, but I am old enough to remember when it was a rare thing to see a hawk or other bird of prey. Now I see red tails and cooper's hawks all the time. In my current neighborhood, it is actually a problem since the local red tail has killed off all of the doves, cardinals and blue jays. I am also seeing wild turkeys, falcons, foxes, and a whole slew of animals that had virtually disappeared in 1970's. The recovery of most of these bird of prey species is related to pollution control and the banning of chemicals such as DDT. For other species, it is the managed recovery by environmental agencies that has led to new or restored populations.

When I lived in MA, I lived in Woburn, which was the subject of the movie "A Civil Action." In my neighborhood, our family was the only one not to lose someone to cancer. The lake in our neighborhood had died, meaning all of the fish and water fowl had left or had been killed off because of pollution from tanneries. Three decades later, people can now swim in the water in Horn Pond and people in my old neighborhood can actually drink and prepare food with the water from the tap.

When I was in high school in Michigan, a river a few miles from my house was downstream from Dow Chemical. At one point the river actually caught fire from all the crap in the water. The world's biggest carp was harvested from the river, and it was ten pounds of fish and thirty-five pounds of tumor. That area is still recovering from the damage done by Dow. In fact, there are houses along the river that have been condemned because of the pollutant levels in their soil. Dow has reduced its emissions to comply with current regulations, but the pollution it released before is still active in the ecosystem.

There are tree huggers and granola brains who call themselves environmentalists. However, there are also scientists who actually measure things, determine impact, and push for meaningful corrective action. If you are basing your opinions on young men in dreds and tie dye t-shirts, you are as uninformed as your posts seem to be. If not, then you are a deliberate idiot, which is even worse.

You can't dismiss everything to do with environmentalism because of some crazy hippy wiccans. The equivalent would be saying that all conservatives are crazy racists because David Duke declared as a republican.

Really... you should grow up and try to sort through the noise to find out what's real and what's not rather than dismissing everything from ignorance.

ross80477's picture

It looks like you should have

It looks like you should have quit while your were behind. Personally, I like having large predators around.

They provide a good reminder to everyone that competition not regulation is what we need to run the world. Equal opportunity not equal outcome is how the natural world works.

On the other hand if we are going to put these wolves on an Affirmative Action Plan we could at least make sure they are released in urban areas.

CRW's picture

I must have missed

I must have missed something... what did you think I actually said?

ross80477's picture

I don't know I got bored

I don't know I got bored after the first run on paragraph about the fake DDT scare. It's a shame that Rachael Carson was so wrong and ended up killing more folks than Hitler and Stalin combined.

I didn't see the up side of making rugs out of wolves before they are shown to be a problem, but I don't buy into an artificial introduction of a species just so politicos can play the endangered species game either.

CRW's picture

Fake DDT? Really? Do you

Fake DDT? Really? Do you believe this?

http://www.epa.gov/pbt/pubs/ddt.htm

What harmful effects can DDT have on us?

Probable human carcinogen Damages the liver Temporarily damages the nervous system Reduces reproductive success Can cause liver cancer Damages reproductive system

Go look at the data related to birds of prey and prevalence of DDT in the echosystem. Almost 15 years to the day after the ban went into place, significant increases in bird populations were observed.

Really... pull your head our butt and stop reading political web sites. Learn some science. There is a balanced perspective based on FACTS.

Close x
Don't Miss Out! |
Like us on Facebook?