Austin, TX - DogsBite.org recently reviewed 5-years of dog bite data gained from the City of Austin under the Freedom of Information Act. The data shows that dog bites have increased substantially since the city adopted a No-Kill policy in 2010. Between 2009 and 2011, dog bites increased 35%. The primary offenders of all bites were pit bulls and their mixes, responsible for 22% (1,288) followed by Labradors and their mixes, which inflicted 12% (682) during the 5-year period.
City of Greater Geelong figures show 109 reported dog attacks in the first seven months of the year, compared with 117 for last year. A report to tonight's council meeting shows an increase in the number of dangerous dogs on the loose. Last year, 3435 dogs were found at large in the region, a rise of 21.8 per cent on the previous year.
Charlottesville, Virginia has been the premier shelter of the No Kill Equation for a number of years. Delving into State records shows that bites have risen considerably as well. Over the past five years, bites from cats have risen from 5 bites in 2008 to 15 bites in 2011. Dog bites doubled with 9 dog bites in 2008 to 20 dog bites in 2011. The award winning No Kill director has recently "resigned" her position.
Many severe pit bull maulings/fatalities from pits adopted by No Kill rescues who fly the banner that "Pits get a Bad Rap". Although the problem with pit bulls is not new, the amount of maulings and fatalities from pit bulls has increased to 2/3rds of the fatalities are now committed by pit bulls. http://cravendesires.blogspot.com/2011/10/animal-people-more-adoptions-will-not.html
To go even further, No Kill intervenes in the form of rescue for dogs that have killed or mauled. Keeping these canines so that the community will always be at risk if one escapes or even adopted out after a questionable rehab. This is a case where a dog killed a baby yet the dog is able to live it's life and a baby never had the chance thanks to the work of No Kill. http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/aug/27/supreme-court-city-cant-euthanize-dog-killed-child/
Could this be coincidence? Not hardly. No Kill has been in existence for a couple of decades but only in the 2000s did the line become blurred and movements formed to bring No Kill to open door shelters, the public shelters. The term "no kill" was originally designed to distinguish between a private shelter run by a non profit who picks pets in order to not have to euthanize. Open door shelters are those who take any and all pets upon presentation and are usually connected with animal control. The mid-2000s brought a radical type of No Kill in the form of the "No Kill Equation". And with that advent comes issues regarding public safety and health.
When the City of Philadelphia installed the No Kill Equation, it ended with several people having to take treatments for rabies. The premier No Kill shelter had failed to keep adequate records and had euthanized quarantined animals early, without determining whether it had rabies per a city audit.
First, PACCA staff admitted to the auditors that some animals had been put to death prior to the required ten day holding period for bite cases. PACCA records were not maintained sufficiently to allow us to confirm compliance with holding requirements for animals that had bitten someone and could possibly have had the rabies virus. PACCA also failed to keep separate files for bite cases.
Second, PACCA’s monthly reports to the Health Department, mandated under the contract, were not always accurate.”
The number of fatal dog attacks in the USA have been going up along with the advent of the No Kill Equation movement. The yearly average was 17 fatalities by DBRF, dog bite related fatalities, in the 1980s and the 1990s. Keeping in mind that the NKE movement started taking off around 2004. In 2007 there were 33 DBRFs, almost twice as many as ten years previously. The year of 2009 saw 30 DBRFs, 2010 had 34, 2011 had 34. Again, it is difficult to say that this is a coincidence.
The Hayden Act of 1998 in California became the base of the No Kill movement. Before the Hayden Act, California had 35,102 dog bites and 8,211 cat bites. In 1998, 503,559 dogs were processed in the shelters and about 7% of those were for dog bites. But in 2010, California had 42,434 dog bites and 10,053 cat bites, with a dwindling canine intake of 467,096 and a rise in feline takes of 400,433. That means that 9% of the intake were for dog bites. Quite an increase. Coincidence?
Along with this increase comes such stories as the 8 year old girl in Northern California contracting rabies from a feral cat. http://www.opposingviews.com/i/given-2-chance-live-8-year-old-survives-rabies No Kill is a staunch supporter of trap, neuter, and release (TNR). TNR puts cats back out into the community. Cats carry disease such as rabies. A recent scare in Santa Ana, California with typhus points out how free roaming cats can carry the fleas with typhus around, thus putting the public in fear of a major outbreak. A daycare center in LA County, CA had children becoming ill and it was traced to a feral cat colony (TNR). A release from County Supervisor Knabe in 08 refers also to the increase in the colony despite efforts by both private and government agencies to reduce the population. http://knabe.com/2008/10/23/wild-cats-to-be-removed-from-rancho-los-amigos-after-increased-public-health-concerns/#.UD5sksGGrto
Representatives from the Los Angles County Department of Animal Care and Control (DACC) have worked with a local feral cat group for over nine months to find a solution to this growing problem. Despite this effort, the cat population remains significant, and a recent inspection on the campus found five litters. DACC has offered the group numerous resources to assist in this effort; however the number of cats has continued to grow.
It is difficult to say that it is only a mere coincidence that public safety is jeopardize with the advent of the No Kill Equation movement. Too much evidence does show otherwise. What will it take to make officials realize that their priority is the safety of their citizens when it comes to animal control.
Popular VideoPeople were so furious about this Pepsi ad that Pepsi pulled it after just one day. Watch it here and decide if it's offensive: