Quantcast
Animal Rights

No-Kill Animal Shelters the Wrong Way to Go

article image

By Jeff Mackey

As viewers of the popular reality shows about hoarders can likely confirm, peering inside the homes of people who suffer from the psychological compulsion to collect things has a certain morbid attraction, until you realize the toll it takes on the families of the afflicted—and it's far worse when the "things" they're collecting are living, feeling beings.

Animal hoarding is a serious and growing problem, with hoarders taking on far more animals than they can properly care for. The number of reported cases is on the rise, leading the Animal Legal Defense Fund to call hoarding "the number one animal cruelty crisis facing companion animals in communities throughout the country."

Chillingly, the so-called "no kill" movement offers cover for these disturbed individuals, many of whom claim to be "rescuing" the animals and attempt to justify the suffering that they cause as a matter of principle. A Los Angeles Times blog post reported that a quarter of the roughly 6,000 new hoarding cases reported each year in the U.S. consist of supposed "shelters" and "rescues."

Even when rescues and animal shelters aren't hoarding animals themselves—like the self-proclaimed animal "hospice and rehabilitation center" called "Angel's Gate" and the now-defunct "Sacred Vision Animal Sanctuary"—they all too often give away animals to anyone who will take them, including hoarders, to manipulate their euthanasia statistics, regardless of what tragedy that translates into for the animals.

Here are just a few recent examples:

  • When a "rescue" in Georgia shut down, the people who arrived to retrieve the remaining animals discovered the bones of dozens of animals on the property, including the remains of dogs who had been put into crates to die.
  • Two operators of a "no kill" rescue group were arrested in Tennessee when authorities found more than 120 dogs and one cat in a U-Haul truck bound for Virginia, without any air supply or circulation. The animals had been removed from California animal shelters and were crammed four or five to a cage. One dog was dead, and the others were found wallowing in urine and feces, without access to water or even a clean place to stand.
  • A family abandoned their dog on someone's doorstep in a Michigan town where the local animal shelter requires payment of a "surrender fee" to accept animals, as many shelters have begun charging in an attempt to keep animals out and their euthanasia statistics low.
  • When animal-control officials searched a "no kill" cat shelter in Indiana, they found 34 cats living in filth and squalor. Four of the cats subsequently died, and many others were sick
  • The operators of an animal rescue in New York were charged with 54 misdemeanor counts after 68 dogs and cats were removed from their "unsanitary" home.
  • One New Jersey rescue claimed to be "saving" puppies from animal shelters in the South, but it was actually selling them for profit in the North.

The failure of "no kill" animal shelters and rescues to address the problems facing homeless animals—and often making matters worse—is why PETA remains focused on the solution to the animal overpopulation crisis: creating a no-birth nation. PETA's fleet of mobile low-cost veterinary clinics (responsible for sterilizing 10,564 animals in 2011 and almost 80,000 so far since 2001!) and our advocacy of strong spay-and-neuter legislation are key to keeping animals out of the hands of hoarders and other people who don't have their best interests at heart and guaranteeing that every animal born has a loving, permanent home awaiting him or her.

How You Can Help Animals in Shelters

Volunteer to help your local animal shelter screen potential adopters and placement partners. Animal shelters can contact PETA for placement-partner applications and agreements. Please also be sure to spay or neuter your animal companions and encourage others to do the same—it's the best way to end the need for animal rescues altogether!

Get More:
 

Comments

Mary Tully's picture

PeTA has always been REALLY

PeTA has always been REALLY up-front about their euthanasia policy and why they offer the service to animals requiring it, in the greater Virginia area. Their policy regarding humane euthanasia is on their website, and it's been in the news a lot lately.

An Ag industry front group bent on keeping the confinement, concentration, deprivation and violent disassembly of animals who are exploited for food, cheap, secretive, and legal, has found a way to manipulate PeTA's euthanasia story to their advantage.

PeTA's ability to create social change, hasn't gone unnoticed by corporations like Monsanto, McDonald's, KFC, Outback Steakhouse, Wendy's, or Cargill, all animal enterprise giants who contribute heavily to the smear campaign against PeTA. Here's PeTA's side of the story:

http://www.peta.org/b/thepetafiles/archive/2009/03/30/why-we-euthanize.aspx

According to the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Community Services, nearly ALL of PeTA's intake is limited to owner surrenders expressly for the service of humane euthanasia. The state requires that owners surrendering animals sign a document stating that they've been made aware their animal may be immediately euthanized according to the admitting facility's policy.

In PeTA's case, because their facility isn't a "shelter," they refer adoptable animals to other facilities, unless there's an immediate forever home available for them. This is something that the architects of the smear campaign against PeTA strategically omit. They even erroneously refer to PeTA as a "shelter," to make it sound as though PeTA dupes the public into surrendering healthy, adoptable animals, which is simply not true.

PeTA is licensed by the state of Virginia as a "humane society." There's a significant legal difference between the two.

It's appalling that an industry that exploits and causes the violent deaths of TENS of BILLIONS of healthy animals, will stoop to exploiting the plights of sick and injured companion animals, in a single region of Virginia, to save their bottom line.

Euthanasia is never pretty, but as long as animals in the Virginia area require that service, either for illness, injury, or emotional devastation, PeTA will offer it to them, despite the smear campaign, and despite the undeserved criticism they receive. It would make a lot of folks happy if PeTA ended their euthanasia program, but I'd have to wonder what sort of animal advocacy they would be, if they chose to turn their backs on animals in their most dire time of need.

PeTA does a LOT for companion animals, from spaying and neutering over 80,000 of them, to liberating them from laboratories that use them in cruel experiments. I think it's okay that PeTA doesn't spend their money running just another "shelter," when they can help so many more animals using their money to create social change that makes ALL animals' lives better.

Alafair Robicheaux's picture

notbornyesterday please

notbornyesterday please friend me on facebook i tend to agree with you.

Alafair Robicheaux's picture

notbornyesterday please

notbornyesterday please friend me on facebook i tend to agree with you.

lvcsslacker's picture

Why support the no-kill

Why support the no-kill shelters? Why not get more animals out of the shelters that kill? That way they kill fewer animals.

Emmy's picture

PETA's Norfolk VA 'shelter'

PETA's Norfolk VA 'shelter' statistics for 2011: Of an intake of 1,992 animals, just 24 were adopted and 34 transferred. Number killed? 1,911. Yep, almost 96% were killed, and a majority of those animals were killed within 24 hours of arriving there.

Is hoarding a bad thing to do? No one would deny that. But I'd guess that the majority of people in the U.S. would say that killing 96% of the animals that come through PETA's door is a fate much worse.

PETA and Jeff Mackey don't have any moral authority to spout their opinions on what is best for any animal!

NotBornYesterday's picture

And neither do you, Emmy,

And neither do you, Emmy, neither do you. PETA is the only honest organization out there now. HSUS is copping a buzz on the "No Kill" koolaid and the ASPCA is completely drunk on it. And all the while animals languish in the "No Kill" shelters for years in cages. It is more perverted to watch these poor animals die a slow death and "No Kill" attracts those kinds of people. People who can't see the suffering they are causing. We know PETA isn't preverted at least. I appreciate honesty, you throw stones at it.

Jay Teske's picture

Actually, I'd say ideologies

Actually, I'd say ideologies don't get much more perverted than PeTA's has become. For an organization that claims ALL life is precious-- and admonishes those who kill cows, pigs, and chickens for food-- it it sure perverted that they kill companion animals en mass... without even trying to use a small portion of their yearly multimillion dollar bank rolls to SAVE those lives. By PeTA philosophy, it's fine to kill animals... just don't eat them.

NotBornYesterday's picture

Obviously you have failed to

Obviously you have failed to truly observe and learn from PETA because what you state is so grossly misinformed.

Jay Teske's picture

Actions = Louder than

Actions = Louder than Words...

PeTA is a slaughterhouse for companion animals.

That is all.

NotBornYesterday's picture

Correction, "No Kill" is the

Correction, "No Kill" is the slaughterhouse these days. PETA can't hold a candle to "No Kill". Only PETA makes it a quick death, not the slow death by "No Kill".

Michael Z Williamson's picture

They're "honest" yet here

They're "honest" yet here they are claiming to "Help" animals by killing them?

PETA could best help humanity if its members all volunteered to be lab test subjects.

NotBornYesterday's picture

I take it you have a problem

I take it you have a problem with comprehension, yes, they are honest about their euthanization of animals, a dignified death. Whereas "No Kill" is totally dishonest about how many it has killed and not a dignified death either. A death in a cage, lying in feces, slow lingering death. That is the death by "No Kill". Yes, Peta is honest and doesn't go for that crap. PETA doesn't kill animals, the public does. Now even more so because the philosophy of there is not a pet overpopulation problems, there are plenty of homes, has given credibility to breeders to breed more so more have to die in the shelters. I seriously think you can qualify as a lab subject, it might improve your ability to comprehend.

Emmy's picture

NotBornYesterday - can I ask

NotBornYesterday - can I ask how many hours a week you volunteer (or work) at an animal shelter, and for how many years you've done it? I don't ask to argue, just to understand where you're coming from before I respond further.

NotBornYesterday's picture

I can tell you that I do it a

I can tell you that I do it a lot more than you do and was doing it while you were in diapers.

NotBornYesterday's picture

Think about it. Can't kill

Think about it. Can't kill 'em if they ain't there, wise words from a wiser person. Spay/neuter is the solution, not warehousing, not pimping them out the door with BOGO sales, not freebies.

Close x
Don't Miss Out! |
Like us on Facebook?