- Home
- Politics
- Entertainment
- Sports
- Health
- Religion
- Society
- Tech
- Money
- People
- Science
- Galleries
Animal Rights
Are 'Rescued' Pit Bulls Safe Pets?
Three unprovoked Pit Bull attacks on children in one month raise the question of whether this breed is a safe family pet. Two Pit Bulls involved in separate attacks on April 4 were adopted from local Humane Societies. And, the ten-year-old female Pit Bull that mauled a toddler in March had been rescued and raised by the child’s grandmother since it was a puppy.
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Penn Township - On April 4, a three-year-old Pit Bull adopted from the Humane League of Lancaster County in February 2012 mauled a seven-year-old boy at about 5 p.m. outside the owner’s home at 25 Parkside Drive, in Penn Township, according to Police Sgt. George Pappas. Pappas told WHPTV.com/news that the boy’s arm, shoulder and ear were badly torn up in the brutal attack.
Neighbors said they heard a dog growling and a child screaming, “He’s trying to kill me!” and immediately called 911. “The dog would not let go. He just kept biting and biting,” said one of the women who witnessed the attack.
"That's when they went to help," Sgt. Pappas said. According to reports, a man and an 11-year-old boy struggled with the dog and got it off of the boy momentarily, but it escaped from them and attacked the child again.
A woman also helped by trying to pull the dog off the boy by its collar. Eventually the dog released the child, and they got it in the house without anyone else being injured, “The dog then attacked a door of the home, but couldn't get outside. The dog was very vicious, very violent," Pappas said. "It was a pretty bad attack."
Police also praised the quick response by the women who live on Parkside Drive for helping the boy break free from the pit bull’s brutal bites on his arms, head and ears. “I think if we wouldn’t have gotten to him, the dog could’ve grabbed his neck and he would have been done for,” the neighbor continued, “He was so scared.”
The little boy was taken to Lancaster General Hospital and then transported to Hershey Medical Center, according to reports. The child underwent surgery on Wednesday night and Thursday morning and was scheduled for more on Friday, officials stated. He is listed in serious condition, according to his father.
Police say the Pit Bull lived inside the house but managed to get out and attack the seven-year-old boy on the front porch while he was playing with another child. The victim was a regular visitor and knew the dog well. “That boy has been in and out of the house so many times every day,” stated a neighbor.
It’s unclear why the dog snapped. Tshudy said that the dog had "never acted like this before," said Critter Catcher owner Mike Miller who was called to remove the agitated Pit Bull. Tshudy called the dog to the door, and Miller shot him with a tranquilizer dart and crated it. "We were happy to get the dog out without anyone else getting hurt," Miller toldIntelligencer Journal, describing the Pit Bull as “very agitated and aggressive.”
Tshudy adopted the dog from the Humane League of Lancaster County on Feb. 11, according to Mary Wallick, director of marketing at the Humane League, who stated the dog showed no aggression while in their care and had passed a seven-step behavior assessment test. “But there is never a 100 percent guarantee an animal won't hurt someone,” Wallick said.
The dog's original owner surrendered the dog to the Humane League five days before Tshudy adopted it, Wallick said.
Baxter County, Arkansas
Mountain Home - In another attack on April 4, the Baxter County Sheriff's Office reports it is investigating a mauling by a family dog in Mountain Home that put a little boy in the hospital. According to the mother, Amber J. Moody, the 3-year-old was attacked and bitten by the family's 9-month-old Pit Bull Terrier.
It happened that morning around eight o'clock in the family's front yard, the child's mother told deputies. She said that after the attack she and a male friend rushed the child to the Baxter Regional Medical Center emergency room.
The preliminary investigation by sheriff’s deputies revealed that the woman adopted the dog from the local Humane Society early in March 2012. Although the Humane Society has a policy of not adopting Pit Bull Terriers to families with young children, the adoption paperwork that was filled out and signed by Moody indicated that she put 'none' in the section of the form asking about children, according to officials.
Sheriffs reported the boy suffered severe trauma and bite wounds around his face and head. He was air-lifted to Arkansas Children's Hospital where he was rushed into surgery. The child’s current condition is not known.
Henderson County, Tennessee
Etowah - Doris Fletcher was holding her 10-month-old grandson, Isaac, on her lap on March 6. She put Isaac on the floor for a moment to pick up something. As soon as she turned her back, her good-natured 10-year-old Pit Bull, Roxanna savagely attacked the baby without warning. Doris had loved and raised Roxanna since she rescued her as a puppy.
It wasn’t an accidental attack. Fletcher had to fight the dog for the baby. She said she has no doubt Roxanna would have killed the boy if she had not managed to finally pull him free. “I just kept kicking,” Fletcher said. “By the time I got the baby away, I was covered in blood.”
The child suffered multiple bite wounds over his body. He was taken to Mission Hospital, Fletcher said, where he underwent surgery to repair a serious wound to his head.
Fletcher voluntarily turned over Roxanna to Henderson County Animal Control, and the dog was euthanized Tuesday afternoon, just hours after the attack. Although all shots were up to date, a rabies test will be performed, officials stated.
Doris, a retired accountant, was baby-sitting Isaac for his parents when the attack occurred. He had been crying a little, and maybe that upset Roxanna, she told the Ashville Citizen-Times.
“The baby had been on the floor before. I just don’t know what happened. She was very friendly. She had never given any indication of being aggressive. She would bark if somebody came in the yard, but that was about it,” Fletcher said.
Roxanna was an inside dog, a pampered pet who was obedient and well-mannered. After the attack, Fletcher ordered her go outside, and Roxanna immediately obeyed. Fletcher describes herself as an animal lover and said having her beloved Pit Bull euthanized was extremely painful. She had her since she was just a few months old and was wandering beside the road.
Doris also owns another 6-year-old female Pit Bull that she adopted from an Animal Rescue group. After the mauling of her grandson, Fletcher said she is considering turning the dog over to animal control even though it has never shown aggression.
“It hurt me,” Fletcher said. “…but my grandson comes first. I will never have another dog in my house.”
Sources:
http://www.whptv.com/news/local/story/Pit-bull-attacks-child-leaves-him-in-surgery-at/FoG6L1lL4U-Gst8mNP6WzA.cspx http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/619266_Pit-bull-puts-boy-in-hospital.html
http://arkansasmatters.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=527372
http://www.citizen-times.com/article/20120308/NEWS/303080016/Boy-recovers-after-attack-by-pit-bull
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter














Comments
While "Three unprovoked pit
While "Three unprovoked pit bull attacks on children in one month" certainly should "raise the question of whether this breed is a safe family pet," reality is such incidents actually occur far more often than that. In the first week of April 2012 alone, pit bulls adopted from humane societies and rescues, after clearing behavioral screening, inflicted disfiguring attacks on three children and an 18-year-old woman, in separate incidents occurring in four states. This is four more disfiguring attacks than shelter & rescue dogs inflicted during the entire decade 1990-1999, after two fatalities involving adopted wolf hybrids in 1989 temporarily taught the humane community to be more careful about rehoming dogs of dangerous breed, temperament, and history (if known). Of particular note is that while pit bulls had already committed more than half of all dog attack fatalities and disfigurements in the U.S. & Canada from 1982 through 2006, 42% of the total pit bull fatalities since 1982 and 41% of the disfigurements have occurred just since 2007 -- since the Best Friends Animal Society and the American Humane Association, among others, began escalating efforts to rehome pit bulls in the wake of the Michael Vick case. Of further note is that this effort has not demonstrably saved many pit bull lives. Pit bull intakes at animal shelters have increased from 23% of dogs to 29%; pit bull killing at animal shelters has increased from 50% of dogs to 60%. The total number of pit bulls killed at shelters in 2011 was more than 930,000, and was the second highest toll on record, even though 16% of the dogs rehomed from shelters were pit bulls (compared to only 3.3% of dogs in the general population, as measured from classified ads offering dogs for sale or adoption.) --Merritt Clifton, editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE.
Just so you dont forget
Just so you dont forget Merritt:
http://www.nopitbullbans.com/debunking-merritt-clifton/
We dont like you !
Of course you don't, you
Of course you don't, you never have liked the truth about pit bulls.
I have read many arguements
I have read many arguements to your so called studies. I doubt if news classified lists are representative of the dogs for adoption or canine population. Considering there are a lot of pit bull type dogs sold at Walmart, CL and Ebay... I think your study is out dated..
Let us not forget the weiner
Let us not forget the weiner dog who ate off a baby's toes for no apparent reason.
If you have babies and choose to house them with predators large or small, you'd best be alert 24/7 to make sure nothing like this can happen. There was another story about a small dog who gnawed off a baby's penis.
They're carnivores. Babies are deliciously squeaky, plump, full of tasty meat. What do you expect?
You are seriously equating
You are seriously equating the attack on a toe by a dachshund with maulings? I find the only suitable thing to do with comments like yours is to UNDERLINE THEM. Please everyone read imominous' comment.
It was not attack on a toe..
It was not attack on a toe.. the toes were eaten off.. Now Dubv if it were a pit bull type dog you would be crying like a newborn about how mean and unpredicatble a dog they are..
Cannot have your cake and eat it too..
Can you be morally and
Can you be morally and ethically serious and compare an isolated event of toe removal to the many deaths and horrible (much worse than a toe removal, more like scalp and limb removal) maulings committed by your breed? Bob, you have been a caricature of yourself for much too long.
But alas how does a fool like Bob ever gain just enough enlightenment to realize that he is a fool? Difficult question.
also, let us not forget the
also, let us not forget the pomerainian that killed a baby in 2000 or the 6 week puppy lab that killed a baby in 2007. We also cannot forget about the chows, labs, great danes, german shepherds, rottweilers, huskies, and all of the other various breeds that have killed. if people say that x amount of pit bulls killed, it would be absolutely necessary to know exactly what specific breeds they were before they can even determine it was a pit bull. So when someone makes a rediclus claim that 14 pit bulls killed in one year, they would have to know the specific breeds of those pit bulls. Otherwise it could be a mutt and or lookalike. Thus far, no one can determine the specific breeds of dogs called pit bulls. When people say a pit bull killed, it could be a boxer/lab mix or bulldog/hound mix. A pit bull is a catch all phrase for the look of a dog. If anyone wants to challenge that, then name off precisely the specific breeds. the number one killing specific breed is the rottweiler by far, but I still blame negligence, rather than the breed.
Clay, if you believe the
Clay, if you believe the breed reports of those attacks, then you must believe the breed reports about pit bulls. And those indicate that they kill more than all the other breeds you mention. Own it. As far as multiple breeds of pit, the two most common AST and APBT are the same breed. You know that the AKC registers ASTs and the UKC registers APBTs and that MANY dogs are registered in both and under the different breeds! They are highly interrelated and not differentiable. Argue that if you will it is fact. They are both fighting breeds. And the AmBull is a big pit mutt created in the 1970s to replica a nearly extinct breed.
The only thing that is
The only thing that is frightening, is people like you, that are unemployed, living in your mother's basement, writing things about something you have no experience with or knowledge of, but what you choose to read.
http://www.workingpitbull.com
http://www.workingpitbull.com/amstaffpit.htm
Here's a pit expert laying it out. It's splitting hairs between the two and you wouldn't be able to tell between them in your rescue. And they are co-registered in the UKC and AKC. They both are recently differentiated somewhat from the breed you like, the one created by European sociopaths for a bloodsport. Something tells me that if pit bulls did not exist, clay hund would have to invent them. Did you get that clay?
From Diane Jessup in her book
From Diane Jessup in her book The Working Pit Bull
p82-83
"A breed that until the late 1980s was virtually unheard of, this breed, I believe was "manufactured"from existing lines of large pit bulldogs during the eighties to attract the novice Pit Bull owner whothought "bigger is better." Some lines are probably pure Pit Bulls which survived and developedalong unique lines in secluded Southern states. Some lines of this "purebred" are APBTs crossedwith any of a half dozen large Mastiff-type breeds. This breed has been endowed with a rich and rather fictional history by the breeds promoters. These dogs are rarely fought, but instead are sold as a sort of "super guard dog" endowed with all sorts of supernatural abilities. It is marketed almost exclusively to those people who want a "big Pit Bull" for guard or attack work."
p84
"The American Bulldog is almost identical to the Pit Bulldog, and is identified by its massive size."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113
http://www.scribd.com/doc/11355114/The-American-Bulldog-is-a-pit-bull
It is obvious why you want people to believe that AmStaffs and other pit bull type dogs are not pit bulls, that way you can divide the casualty pile into smaller pieces and pits don't look as bad. These dogs all have a recent common ancestor, are regularly crossed, and were used for bloodsports. So, when they all tend to behave similarly and hurt other animals and humans, we should not be surprised. Clay would love to stand back and say "oh yeah, not a pit that's an american staffie". Same thing, doofus, when it comes to the traits contributing to this.
Just admit it, clay you like dangerous dogs. It does something for you. Why don't you and your dogs all create your own little survivor island scenario and leave society?
http://www.alwaysfaithfulamst
http://www.alwaysfaithfulamstaffs.net/id39.html
Same basic dog. Like claiming two books are totally different because their indices are organized differently and the font was changed a bit.
from the link
"Several years ago, the top APBT of the United Kennel Club was also the top American Staffordshire Terrier of the American Kennel Club! All claims and dramatic protestations to the contrary, in some cases, the Amstaff and the APBT are the same breed."
Clay, how does it feel to be
Clay, how does it feel to be proven wrong time and time again? It must be either your obviously dull wit or you only read things that agree with you. Here is what I found in 30 seconds.
http://www.bulldogbreeds.com/americanpitbullterrier.html
cntrl+f and then search for dual
It is a regular practice to dual register these dogs, the breed stewardship in both dog communities is abysmal, and staffs and pit bulls are very, very similar and continually crossbred. Further, the american bulldog was nearly extinct in the 1970s and do you know where they got the genetics to reconstitute the breed? From many sources, but primarily the pit bull breeds. If you dig through am bull pedigrees, then you will see infusion of pit dna over and over.
You're a fool Clay, and I can easily prove that and not just assert it.
LOSERS!!!!
LOSERS!!!!
Drunk now Clay? Or just the
Drunk now Clay? Or just the frustration of your truly dull wit?
Drunk? LOL, figures you'd say
Drunk? LOL, figures you'd say something stupid like that. Why, do you get drunk than post things online? Is that why you might suspect someone else might do that? What it is is an observation. Watching a bunch of clowns banning together on these same old article posting the same old garbage. Not sure what you feel you are accomplishing, but whatever you are doing, is helping the pit bull population grow and dedicating shows to the breed. The proof is in the numbers. Compare the pit bull population from ten years ago to today. You aren't intelligent enough to realize that vilification actually makes breeds extremely popular. You can pat yourself on the back for that.
Clay, you don't see the irony
Clay, you don't see the irony in you posting here over and over and then pointing out that other people are losers or whatever for doing the same thing?
When you are in an adult bookstore do you wheel around and point at others and scream pervert?
Now, the predictable, clay will try to come with a witty retort, but he is incapable.
From all I have seen from the
From all I have seen from the Clayhead, I vote drunk. Let's look at the Clayhead's logic. He says that our vilification has made the breed popular. So that means basically criminals love pit bulls. Because no sane person would have one based on our vilification, would they? So pits are popular because of the criminal element. So where does that leave the Clayhead? Drunk? Criminal? You can decide based on his rantings.
In Clay's world this dog
In Clay's world this dog created by sociopaths to fight other dogs to the death somehow became cherished family pets. All was well, then some people for some inexplicable reason, starting thinking they were particularly dangerous. Then the criminal element got ahold of them and now we are in our current position, with those contrary to clay's position feeding the fire of criminal desire for pits.
Yeah, that seems incredibly plausible compared to a more parsimonious answer that actually matches history.
"I simply don't understand
"I simply don't understand why anyone would want a breed known for aggressiveness as a family dog. It seems to me the height of arrogance and stupidity."
Exactly.
Branwen.. you are a liar.. a
Branwen.. you are a liar.. a person that does not speak the truth. I am a volunteer at a shelter nothing more.. I do not say who gets to adopt a pit bull type dog.. period. I never have once sd. I make a decision on who gets a dog. I work with pit bull type dogs and own two adopted pit bulls.
You are a sub human troll who lies..no bigger insult in my opinion.
Pit bull fanatics keep lying
Pit bull fanatics keep lying to the public and telling them that pit bulls were once "nanny dogs", and are "great with children"...then wonder why a prospective adopter would lie on their application in order to bring a "nanny dog" into a home with kids.
It's interesting that so many shelters think they have done their civic duty by adopting dangerous dogs to homes "without kids", in complete disregard for the safety of neighborhood children who will most likely come into contact with the dog someday. Pits are being actively bred for both dog aggression and human aggression by large numbers of breeders...criminals, dog fighters, gang members, drug dealers, and losers selling them as cheap burgler alarms or thug fashion accessories.
In both recent cases, rescued pits almost killed children because they exhibited breed-specific traits...once aroused into fight mode, they did not bite and retreat, but clamped on and continued mauling in an attempt to kill their victim. These dogs should have never been adopted out as family pets, and a ten minute "temperament test" by a shelter employee will not tell much about the propensity for a pit bull to react in different situations.
As for Bob Cronk, also known as "BullyBob"....he once bragged online about adopting out a pit bull that had been returned to the shelter for being aggressive toward children. He personifies the types of people involved in "pit bull rescue".....they have zero concern for public safety, no commpassion for victims of pit bull attacks, and place no value on the life of a child.
You are a liar.. only the
You are a liar.. only the shelter director and staff makes decsions who gets to adopt a dog. I vol and work with pit bull type dogs but the adoption decision is not in my hands.
You are scum..worse than the ds that I step in.
Really Bob? You don't
Really Bob? You don't remember the conversation? You blamed the adoptive family because they were "told" the dog was "afraid of kids". The family had a visitor with kids, and the dog growled menacingly at them, so they returned it to the shelter. You were very proud of the fact that the dog was then "rehomed" to a man with "no small children". Never mind that the neighbors may have children, that the man may someday have grand children, or other family that may visit with children...or that the world is full of children that could eventually come in contact with the dog...with possibly fatal results.
You were just claiming how your shelter evaluates dogs carefully. I wonder how the shelter "sells" a child aggressive dog to potential adopters?
If I overstated your role in the decision making process, my apologies. What I have NOT overstated is the fact that you posted the adoption of a child aggressive pit bull from the shleter you volunteer at as an adoption "success" story. You are too much of a fanatic to even realize that most emotionally healthy adults...even those who love animals.....would find this appalling.
Thanks for the reminder..
Thanks for the reminder.. what we told the adoptive family is that if you have kids over to crate the dog. They were allowed to have the dog since they did not have children and the man was actually a police officer so you would think they would be responsible. However they were not and had a bunch of people over with children.The dog did growl which is a warning. Kind of like saying excuse me. The dog was adopted by a single gentlemen with grown children and keeps the dogs inside when he works. I do not see anything wrong with that at all. The dog is controlled and not set up for failure. What I do think about power breed dogs is that they all take more responsiblity than a toy dog. When I walk my dog I look ahead making sure no loose dogs are out and cross the street when meeting other people. I know that their are a lot of people that do not like pit bull type dogs.. if they want to meet my dog it is fine with me but its going to be done under supervision.
Bob, you are missing the
Bob, you are missing the point; your shelter knowingly adopted out a pit bull that was AGGRESSIVE TOWARD CHILDREN, with your whole-hearted approval. Do you suppose that the shelter that adopted out the pit bull that mauled the seven year old neighbor knew that dog was aggressive toward children, but placed it in a home "without children"? Mistakes happen, and dogs get loose.
You hold yourself up as a "responsible pit bull owner", yet you post on your public Facebook page that in February you thought you lost your dog, and couldn't find her anywhere. You had friends come help you "look for her in the forest behind my house". If you are giving advice on the internet and posing as an expert on pit bulls and responsible ownership, how do you reconcile this mistake? I recall once a long time ago, reading a post from you in the comments section of a news article where you said you had "accidently" left the gate open, but came home to find your dogs obediantly sitting in the yard. Do you remember that? Do you consider yourself irresponsible?
At the heart of this article is the problem of shelters misleading potential adopters about the risks and dangers of pit bull adoption. No one has a right to place a dog in my neighborhood which, if given the opportunity, will kill my children. No one. It has become apparent that the public cannot trust a pit bull owner's assessment of their own dog's temperament; we also cannot trust the pit bull "experts" and rescue groups who claim to evaluate rescued pit bulls and deem them to be safe pets.
Your Facebook page leads me to believe that you have an unhealthy obsession with pit bulls, to the point that you would knowingly put children at risk. You posted two years ago...
"Getting into a nasty arguement about having my dog on Winslow School Grounds. I pay 6,000 a year in taxes and some yo yo told me I could not have my dog there.. told him to go pound sand and walked off."
Bringing your pit bulls onto school property, and arguing that you have more of a right to be there than the children, is a red flag to me; I wouldn't expect you to have any compassion for child victims of pit bulls.
Must be quite the celebrity
Must be quite the celebrity if you track things I sd. two years ago..
Don't flatter yourself. The
Don't flatter yourself. The internet tracks things you said years ago. If you're the big pit bull proponent and expert, you've written things that will forever come back to haunt you.
Like being a responsible owner who leaves the gate open. You're lucky the dogs were still there, that some little old lady didn't walk her shih tzu past your fence, or that a pack of loud little kids swarmed by.
Lucky? Yes. Responsible? Debatable. Tragedy is an opportunist. It loves people like you.
Hmm... I guess that is why
Hmm... I guess that is why they have privcey settings in FB so a pit bull hater will not try to decide you have an "obsession with pit bulls".
These posts do actually no good agrueing with someone hundreds of miles away. No law is going to be changed because of these petty arguements.
For your information my dog Lilly was part of an animal cruelty case, unfortunately her former master lives about 20 houses from me which I did not know. I was afraid he had tried to steal her back.. however she was in the back yard...
Now that I have set my FB settings I dont have to worry about an internet preditor... creep.
I hope only to inoculate
I hope only to inoculate people who read your comments from catching your stupid and making decisions that endanger others.
Not creepy at all, Bob....you
Not creepy at all, Bob....you have put yourself out there as a pit bull expert, and are constantly using personal anecdotes to back up your opinion. You have a PUBLIC Facebook page filled with pictures of pit bulls, and posts about pit bulls. You WANT to be found on the internet by other pit bull advocates.
Quite the contrary, I find these debates valuable....I think its a great way to let the general public understand what you pit bull advocates are all about. No one is here to change your opinion, Bob....you are a fanatic, and you are getting some emotional needs met by being involved in your pit bull "cause".But the more people like you and Clay "debate" the issue, the more readers can see your faulty reasoning and bizzare world view.
I have no desire to censor you.
Bob, it turns out Bran was
Bob, it turns out Bran was right. You kind of acknowledged that and then pivoted into excuse making. Smooth move. No shame?
Does your facility have
Does your facility have resource limitations in terms of space, money, man hours? If so, resources spent on aggressive dogs must be taken from non-aggressive dogs.
Heard that argurement
Heard that argurement before... the only way to solve this is for breeders of all dogs slow down.. and good luck trying to get them to do that. Its like no kill shelter are actually kill shelters since when a no kill turns a dog away it forces the kill shelter to do the dirty work. Basic economics of guns and butter will tell you this.
So Bob disagrees with basic
So Bob disagrees with basic math:
total budget = total budget for aggressive dogs + total budget for non-aggressive dogs
How am I not surprised? The only way around this is if a certain number of extra donations are brought in specifically by rehabbing dangerous dogs (nutters want to help the aggressive ones especially), and judging by you, I wouldn't doubt if that is true.
Pit bull fanatics keep lying
Pit bull fanatics keep lying to the public and telling them that pit bulls were once "nanny dogs", and are "great with children"...then wonder why a prospective adopter would lie on their application in order to bring a "nanny dog" into a home with kids.
It's interesting that so many shelters think they have done their civic duty by adopting dangerous dogs to homes "without kids", in complete disregard for the safety of neighborhood children who will most likely come into contact with the dog someday. Pits are being actively bred for both dog aggression and human aggression by large numbers of breeders...criminals, dog fighters, gang members, drug dealers, and losers selling them as cheap burgler alarms or thug fashion accessories.
In both recent cases, rescued pits almost killed children because they exhibited breed-specific traits...once aroused into fight mode, they did not bite and retreat, but clamped on and continued mauling in an attempt to kill their victim. These dogs should have never been adopted out as family pets, and a ten minute "temperament test" by a shelter employee will not tell much about the propensity for a pit bull to react in different situations.
As for Bob Cronk, also known as "BullyBob"....he once bragged online about adopting out a pit bull that had been returned to the shelter for being aggressive toward children. He personifies the types of people involved in "pit bull rescue".....they have zero concern for public safety, no commpassion for victims of pit bull attacks, and place no value on the life of a child.
And you know the Pitty People
And you know the Pitty People deny the breed-specific traits. I just had someone point out recent Bullmastiff attacks, knowing I have Mastiff's. Well, humm...the Bullmastiff was developed breeding the English Mastiff with the Bulldog to get a smaller, more aggressive version of the EM. So go figure. Also the Mastiff group would rather see an aggressive Mastiff PTS than "rehabilitated" and rehomed.
Something in a dog's genetic
Something in a dog's genetic memory tells it to chase prey, to keep attacking prey, and to defend its territory against strangers.
The third case may have been a situation of jealousy or dominance - the pampered pet was being usurped. As for the one where the woman put "none" for children at home.... That is a risk she entered into. She should have tried a little harder to keep her child safe vs. wanting a specific dog.
In any case, just once I'd love to hear a story that doesn't involve a pit bull or pit mix.
Well there is a couple of
Well there is a couple of children killed by huskies this year.. does that make you feel better ?
Cite your sources and I might
Cite your sources and I might just.
Yes and a lot of the mix
Yes and a lot of the mix breeds are going to be called a pit bull. There is not a dog problem but a people problem. To many people view a dog as disposable. I think it would be fine with all shelter managers and volunteers to never have to have a shelter for animals.. but that is a big day dream.
There are 160+ purebreds
There are 160+ purebreds besides thousands of mixed breeds. Lot's of options for the averge JPQ than a pit.
Nothing is 100 per cent
Nothing is 100 per cent guaranteed. In comparsion to the successful adoptions that never make the news to the unsuccessful adoptions that do make the news the former far out weights the later.. A good adoption will not make the news where a bad adoption may make the news.
Bob, how many successful
Bob, how many successful adoptions of pit bulls are needed to outweigh an adoption that results in a child being mauled? You brought up the equivalency, so now what is your weighting of the two instances? Are they equally weighted? Do you need only one good pit to make up for a mauler?
As far as nothing being 100% in life, this is true. But a rational adult does not multiply risks with little pay off. For instance, adopt a pit bull (a breed that at least seems to be more aggressive) versus adopt a breed with no human kills in the last decade that can also provide all the positives a pit could without the negatives. Rational adults choose the later based upon a simple exercise of precaution. The pit bull communities current strategy to reduce pit bull euthanasia is bound to fail because it relies upon irresponsible people beginning to act responsibly and for responsible people to act irresponsibly by adopting a pit bull.
Show some proof of what you
Show some proof of what you say, BB. If there were so many successful adoptions, why are the shelters so full of pit bulls and that breed is the most euthanized (58%) in our shelters? That fact alone belies your statement.
Personally, I would say not
Personally, I would say not to your average JPQ. Too many Pits have had aggression issues in the past to a person or other dogs, but the pitty people think they can be "rehabilitated". I don't believe the potential adopter is getting the full story in order to be prepared. I'm also skeptical of all these so called "bait dogs' that seem to be appearing. Me thinks the pitty people are, in their typical fashion, distorting the truth in order to try to find homes for all these dogs, that THEY think are adoptable.