Should Birds be Kept as Pets?

Share This Story

By Monica Engebretson

What if you went over to your neighbor’s house and noticed that they had a cat sitting in a cage in their living room?

You’d probably ask if the cat was sick or recovering from an injury.

What if they told you that they keep her in there most of the time because the house stays cleaner that way?

Now imagine that they open the cage door and bring the cat out, but before setting her down they wrap some yarn around her front legs tying them together in a hobble.

This, they say, keeps her from running outside where she might get hurt, plus it keeps her from jumping up on the counter.

If you’re like most humane-minded people you’d be appalled and would consider this treatment cruel. Your state’s anti-cruelty laws would likely agree.

So why don’t people question the practice of keeping birds as pets?

A parrot is just as active and inquisitive as a cat. In fact, parrots have greater cognitive abilities than cats — parrots have been compared to human toddlers in terms of their intelligence and emotional needs.

Anyone who has ever had, or taken care of, a bird can attest that it is extremely difficult to care for a bird without using a cage or controlling their flight.

However, whether or not cages or flight control are necessary for caring for captive birds may be irrelevant to the question of whether the birds make suitable pets. Perhaps a more relevant question is whether or not it is acceptable to keep a particular animal as a companion if ensuring his or her safety or compatibility in the home requires that he or she be constantly caged and/or physically disabled.

Birds are routinely denied two of their most fundamental natural behaviors — flying and socialization. Denial of these activities can cause physical and behavioral abnormalities including incessant screaming, pacing, head-bobbing, feather-plucking, and self-mutilation. Captive birds may also exhibit extremely low behavior, appearing to be catatonic. This is not the sign of a well-adjusted bird, it’s a sign of a bird who has given up.

Denial of natural behavior isn’t the only factor that calls to question the suitability of birds as companion animals. The vast majority of birds kept as pets are also fed inadequate seed-only diets and most are never taken to a veterinarian — only 11.7% of bird-owning households currently seek veterinary advice for their birds. It has been estimated that malnutrition is responsible for up to 90% of all clinical conditions seen by avian practitioners.

While changes in the captive environment (cage size, enrichment, socialization) can improve the welfare of captive parrots, such changes require that the owner has sufficient knowledge, resources, and motivation to fulfill these requisites, and that the motivation to provide such complex care regimes is sustained throughout the life of the parrot — which may be 20 to 50 years or more depending on species. Indeed, many parrots outlive their caretakers and even more outlive their caretakers’ interest in them.

In addition, evidence suggests that as long as the private ownership of parrots remains socially acceptable and commercial profits persist, the smuggling of parrots for the pet trade will likely continue despite trade restrictions and availability of captive-bred birds. In fact, because captive-bred birds are physically identical to their wild-caught counterparts, the presence of captive-bred birds in the trade actually helps facilitate the wild trade by providing cover for smuggled birds.

When one considers the considerable restrictions captive birds endure, the inadequate diets most are fed, and impact the trade in birds as pets has had on species in the wild, it is easy to conclude that, like other non-domesticated animals, birds are not suitable companion animals.

Disclaimer: As expressed in this article birds are non-domesticated animals that belong in the wild where they can fly freely and express their natural behaviors. However, due to the large number of birds living in captivity which cannot be returned to the wild and the limited space available in avian sanctuaries, optimizing care of birds held in private hands can go far in reducing suffering and improving the welfare of captive birds. Tips for optimizing care can be found at www.nationalbirdday.org.

Monica Engebretson is senior program associate at Born Free USA

Share This Story

`
missnadia's picture

I couldn't agree more with this article. Birds are beautiful-- when they are flying free. Keeping a bird and not letting it fly would be like somebody sticking us in a cage and not letting us walk. Very very sad. I'm hoping one day it will be illegal to breed or keep these beautiful creatures as pets. They deserve better, they deserve freedom.

Crow's picture

I don't think those in favor of pet birds read the original question.

There's a big difference between "can" and "should". Yes, I suppose some people CAN make life comfortable for a pet bird. But unless they're adopting rescued birds that had no chance of living in the wild, why SHOULD anybody have a pet bird? What's in it for the birds?

Same goes for any kind of animal. Yes, we CAN buy, sell, and breed animals to be pets . But SHOULD we? I can't think of any reason.

Kitabella's picture

I find it amazing that I can go feed the Lorikeets in the zoo, see beautiful tropical parrots, and then go home to the same birds in my living room. I can't have own a koala, or a monkey (without a license), or a tiger. Why a parrot?

And since everyone makes the argument that dogs and cats are domesticated, how long does domestication take? Should we give up and return all Psittacines to the wild and outlaw them as personal pets , or continue to breed them for another few hundred years till we don't need cages for them anymore?

iprudence's picture

In 1993 I bought a beautiful 3 yr old conure who had been given up to a reputable bird store. In 1998, my husband wanted a second bird and a senegal joined us. After my husband died in 2002 I had our babies to take care of and soon after, I rescued a baby CAG. I did not want a third bird but could not stand seeing this beautiful creature die or be abused or both.

It is my solemn responsibility to take care of them until I am physically unable. I am 60 and healthy and the flock keeps me active. I have made monetary arrangements for their transfer to a sanctuary--when the time comes

My Avian vet endorses me as a bird care specialist and sitter because I take my oath to my flock as seriously as I would take the care of a human being.

Do I think it would be great for them to fly and be in a natural habitat. Of course!

But this is not possible and maybe it is my fault. I did rescued two of the three birds I have and vow--now and forever, to always keep them and enrich their quality of life--till death do us part.

Without them, I would not have made it through the last 8 years since my husband died. And when my husband was dying, his thought was of his beloved bird.

Responsibility...or never get a bird.

It takes a lot to live with birds. Maybe, given another choice I would not have them. But the thought of not having them is so horrible.

My birds get the best food , the biggest cages possible and plenty of attention. I put their lives before mine and would defend them with my life.

So call me crazy for protecting these wild creatures--with all my heart

Alayna Staggers's picture

Big Bird, an Amazon Parrot was purchased by me with a huge cage where he only sat on the top and played and talked. I never clipped his wings nor made him stay in the cage. He was the delight of my household of grandkids. He would fly from room to room, landing on the table and snatching pens and crayons, up he would go laughing in imitation of me. One day a stranger came and left the door open. Big Bird had been looking outside everyday, longing for a mate. July 1st. he flew out the open door never to be seen again. Clear into winter, I scoured the woods and streets, putting up signs. Everyone knew me. A good lady gave me a big white bird, I forget the name-they come in 2 sizes. I felt I was not a good caretaker and gave the new bird to a so called friend who immediately chopped off her wings and stuck her in a cage and changed her name to "Sunshine." When Calua would make loud noises, Karen would use what she called "Behavior Management" on her and would cover her up and stick her in a room by herself. I am sorry I gave Calua to Karen. When you love something, set it free, if it was yours it will come back. At least Big Bird was free. I will never hold another bird hostage again.

Charlie King's picture

I don't have anything to add after reading all the comments. It is telling to me, however, that all the opposing voices are always anonymous. "BirdLover", "bird-man", "AntiFanatics" Give me a break! This is why, in the end, you will fail! If you are passionate about something, you should be proud of it.

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident"..

Arthur Schopenhauer

Very well put arguments, my friends and true parrot lovers!

BirdLover's picture

Well, the only violent opposition I see here is the violent opposition to responsible people keeping pet birds ! This is a forum for OPPOSING VIEWS isn't it? Or did I misread the title of the forum?
However, the violent opposition seems to be that those who favor NO pet birds have taken the position that somehow they are right and everyone else is wrong. In my experience in life, reality is a bit more complex than that.

As far back as human history goes, humans have kept and worked with birds of many types, just as they have with dogs and horses, cattle and chickens, pigs and goats. So, get over it. Humans have an interest in other creatures and do want to share their lives with them. This behavior is not going to go away, no matter what reasons you bring forward to make your argument.

One strange reason you mention is money . One thing I have learned is that when people harp on a certain idea, it generally means that idea is important to them. In other words, those who think money is involved are the kinds of persons who place a big value on money. Not everyone does.

You are not arguing to the point that PEOPLE LOVE BIRDS. That is the point. That is why people have pet birds.
And that isn't going to change anytime soon.

Sarah's picture

It's clear to me that you know very little about different species of animals , and what the differences are between a domesticated animal and a wild animal. You said this:

"As far back as human history goes, humans have kept and worked with birds of many types, just as they have with dogs and horses, cattle and chickens, pigs and goats."

Dogs, horses, cattle, chickens, pigs and goats are all domesticated animals. Therein lies the difference. Parrots are not domesticated. This is the entire issue, one that you have repeatedly missed - be it on accident or on purpose. That difference in and of itself defines whether or not an animal makes a suitable pet, or is "meant" to be kept in captivity.

BirdLover's picture

I like to refer to the real experts when discussing such issues as Domestication of Animals. Domestication of animals is what has made possible present day civilization. Here is what Jared Diamond has to say about domestication: "Domestication requires not just capturing individual wild animals and taming them, but getting them to breed in captivity and modifying them through selective breeding so as to be more useful to us. ....First, it must be a social species living in herds. ...Second, species...which instantly take flight at sings of danger instead of standing their ground, prove to be too nervous to manage. ...Finally, captive animals that are docile and healthy may nevertheless refuse to breed in cages." from pages 238 and 239 in The Third Chimpanzee. The entire book is a great read.

But, back to domestication. Parrots fit all three of the basic requirements for domestication: they live in flocks, they are not to nervous to manage, and they will breed in captivity. Those are the critical issues for domestication. Just because humans have not spent years breeding them so that at present all the parrots in captivity are considered "domesticated" does not mean that they are not well on their way to that definition.

You see, the work of the human race was not completed 100 years ago or fifty years ago or last week, the work of the human race is ongoing. At the present, people ARE breeding parrots to five and ten generations in the US and those birds are in the process of becoming domesticated. It is a done deal.

Some pet birds have already reached the state of absolute domestication: canaries, budgerigars, and cockatiels, also some lovebirds. This is the judgment of the USFWS Scientific Authority about these species. Undoubtedly in time other birds will be added to that list.

Clearly, in the beginning of human history, the birds selected for domestication were those that could help in supplying or providing food or providing some other service. Food suppliers included hawks and falcons used in hunting small game and cormorants used to catch fish. Food providers included laying hens which provided eggs, chickens, ducks and geese provided meat . Other services included homing pigeons which were used to carry messages over long distances. Performance pigeons were used to provide entertainment , such as the rollers who would fly to great heights and do a barrel roll in the air, dropping towards the earth, but stopping short of hitting the ground.

So, never fear, domestication of parrots is well on its way. The ability of parrots to adapt to new environments, their intelligence and their beauty provide the incentive for individuals to work with these birds to the point they do become domesticated.

Sarah's picture

You said this:

"Just because humans have not spent years breeding them so that at present all the parrots in captivity are considered "domesticated" does not mean that they are not well on their way to that definition."

And this:

"So, never fear, domestication of parrots is well on its way. "

So you just admitted, after that long-winded response, that parrots are not currently domesticated.

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

OV Social