Scientists More Likely to Have Autistic Children
According to an expert in the UK, highly analytical couples such as scientists, engineers, physicists and mathematicians, are more likely to produce children with autism.
Professor Simon Baron-Cohen, of the University of Cambridge, says the impaired ability of people with autism to communicate, recognize emotions and socialize is linked with the same genes that enable a person to systemize, that is to find the laws that determines how a system works.
A weakness in these areas is the key characteristic of autism; it is estimated that around one child in every 100 has a form of autism and the vast majority of those are boys.
He says this may help explain the recent rise in diagnoses, while other argue that it is due to greater awareness and better diagnostic skills.
Professor Baron-Cohen terms people such as scientists, mathematicians and engineers as 'systemizers', and links the often diminished interest in the social side of life, and the obsession with detail, which makes them good at what they do, with the symptoms which characterize autism.
Such types, says Professor Baron-Cohen are often attracted to each other and are more likely to pass 'autism' genes on to their offspring.
A survey by the National Autistic Society which found fathers and grandfathers of children with autistic spectrum conditions are twice as likely to work in a systemizing profession, supports his theory.
It has also been found that students in the natural sciences have a higher number of relatives with autism than do students in the humanities, and mathematicians have a higher rate of autistic spectrum conditions compared with the general population.
Other research has also indicated that the parents of children with autism score highly on a questionnaire measuring autistic traits.
Brain scan studies of mothers and fathers of children with autism have revealed that the mothers have a masculinized pattern of brain activity, again suggesting they are strong systemizers.
Given the evidence from a number of sources a genetic cause of autism is not unlikely, with both parents contributing genes that ultimately relate to a similar kind of mind: one with an affinity for thinking systematically.
In the autistic spectrum of disorders the largest groups are classic autism and Asperger syndrome.
Both groups have difficulty developing social relationships, and find communicating with peers and others difficult.
Both also display unusually strong and often obsessive and narrow interests, and a strong adherence to routines.
In classic autism, the person might have an IQ at anywhere on the scale, sometimes in the learning disabled range, and the person invariably had a language delay as a toddler.
In Asperger syndrome however, the person is always at least average in IQ, and may be well above average, and talked on time as a toddler.
As a rule symptoms of the disorders do not manifest themselves clearly until around age two and even then can be difficult to diagnose.
The National Autistic Society, has welcomed the research, particularly any which fosters a better understanding of the nature and possible causes of autism.
The Society estimates that over half a million people in the UK have a form of autism, and say it is a lifelong developmental disorder which requires on-going specialist support.
The paper is published in the journal Archives of Disease of Childhood.
---------------------------
Can autism be cured or managed? Click here to see our Opposing Views debate.
POST YOUR COMMENTS BELOW
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter
OV Social
"In Asperger syndrome however, the person is always at least average in IQ, and may be well above average"
This statement is a popular myth but is completely false. A diagnosis of Aspergers says absolutely nothing about about the IQ of the person. There is nothing in the diagnostic criteria that states that the person must always have an IQ of a certain level.
"As a rule symptoms of the disorders do not manifest themselves clearly until around age two and even then can be difficult to diagnose."
This statement is also false. The symptoms of autism can be be present from birth or they may develop at any time before the age of three. There is no rule that the symptoms don't clearly appear until the age of two,
You don't have to be a scientist to have an autistic child. There is a male biological clock and offspring of men past their mid thirties are more often autistic or have other genetic disorders. Offspring of men in their 40s 50s 60s etc. more often have autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, cancers, autoimmune disorders, and various single gene disorders. Research the paternal age effect. You can start with Wikipedia.
The reason older fathers have children on the autistic spectrum is not because they are 'older fathers' but because they are on the autistic spectrum themselves which means they struggled to get a relationship at all. And when they finally did they attracted a woman also on the autistic spectrum (like attracts like, both my parents are on the autistic spectrum and myself and my husband have Asperger's and we have 2 wonderful autistic children).
Which of course means that their children will be the same as parents: on the autistic spectrum.
Also, lumping cancer and autism together is stupid and WRONG because one is a disease that can affect ANYBODY and the other is a different way of thinking and often means superior intellect at the expense of natural ability for social chit-chat and other bull.
What you're saying is like pulling out only black thread out of black & white chequered jacket to prove it is 'black' whereas it really is both black & white: you're picking a few facts here and there trying to win the argument but your reasoning is weak and flawed.
And Wikipedia is not even an authority on anything as you could write anything in there, even though you don't have all the facts. You could post things on there and if enough rimes the same mistakes are repteaded other gullible people like you will believe it :-)))))))
While I do agree it could be partly a age thing, I also agree that often with ASD it tends to run in families to varying degrees and maybe its not that scientists more likely to have autistic children , but many of them already have traits, some sort of neurological difference themselves. After all it has been said that up to 40% of the population have neurological differences which to me comes under the bigger autism umbrella... Autism still is mysteries as the universe, but many people I know on the autism spectrum, including myself tend to have very different and deserve extended families.. Aspergers Parallel Planet