Save Kissing for Marriage, Says Virgin Lips Movement
Dr. Al Mohler is writing and talking about a trend among dating believers to reserve all sexual intimacy -- including kissing -- for marriage. He says:
Over the past thirty years Western civilization has undergone a near
total transformation in sexual morality. Sex education programs assume
that teenagers (and increasingly pre-teens as well) simply will be
involved in sexual activity. Sexual purity, abstinence, and sexual
denial are written off as unrealistic, unfair, and repressive.
Even
so, the Virgin Lips Movement will come as a shock to some older
evangelicals. For older Christians, the expectation was, as the Bible
makes clear, for sex to wait until marriage. As for kissing, that was
considered to be another matter altogether. To some of these older
Christians, the Virgin Lips Movement sounds like overkill and
over-reaction.
I used to think this sort of thing was over-the-top. But after reading Suzanne's (excellent) article yesterday on Boundless, I no longer do. She writes:
Our culture is full of "empty words" that tell us that sexual
gratification is most important. But Paul warns that choosing
anything—whether sexual impurity or greed—over God is idolatry. So our
choices regarding "how far is too far" aren't about the behaviors
themselves but about our esteem of God and His commands.
These choices are so serious that we can potentially separate
ourselves from our spiritual inheritance—not only the prize awaiting us
in heaven but the power in Christ we can have now. One friend described
it this way: "Getting too physical just dulls you spiritually. Pretty
soon stuff that felt wrong doesn't feel wrong anymore."
And as a pastor, Dr. Mohler concurs. He says:
As any minister who works with youth and young adults knows, the
"how far is too far question" is a constant. The Virgin Lips Movement
represents a determination to stop that train before it leaves the
station, so to speak. Consider this: In the space of little more than a
single generation, we have seen the breaking down of virtually every
social and cultural support for sexual abstinence. ...Now, most young
couples face the temptation of romantic contexts in which intimacy --
and this means sexual intimacy -- is a likely outcome. The Virgin Lips
Movement represents a serious effort to push back against this
expectation and to create boundaries that will protect virtue and honor
marriage.
If you're in a relationship and sin is crouching at your door, both articles are welcome sources of encouragement.

Really?
Kissing, in certain countries, have non-romantic connotations. In parts of Western and Eastern Europe, kissing a form of greeting, such as in France, or goodbye, such as in Russia .
Physical closeness is needed for a relationship to survive and thrive. While it is arguable that kissing is a secondary physicality, I think that kissing is a natural progression of a romantic relationship.
The next step is side hugging...
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-talk-christian-side-hugnov30 ,0,6899998.column
remember, if your genitals touch then you are having sex and will burn in hell forever... hugging guys is even worse, cause that makes you gay.
Wow, how far can they go? Kissing has been part of our culture for thousands of years, and to suddenly say "no, its a sin" seems absurd... which is par for the course with groups like this.
What's funny is that I could almost agree with these abstinence only people... the best way to avoid pregnancy and STDs is to not have sex.
What's next? Holding hands?
No one said it was a sin. How did you go from "abstain from kissing" to "kissing is a sin"? The article stated that the Bible is clear on abstaining from premarital sex and the cleric has noticed a social degredation in sexual purity and thus he is asking his group to abstain from kissing. He never said it was a sin, you are saying it is sin which unless I am mistaken, you don't believe sin exists. Therefore, what do you care?
- The Tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.-
You made it up. No one told you not to kiss. No one told you it was a sin. No one asked you to do or not do anything.
They are just talking about the decisions that some people made. Why must you misrepresent them?
I stand by my original derision... Physical intimacy is not something to be dreaded or feared. Nor is virginity a special state to be cherished or feared.
to revere anything, or to fear anything. You jumped to another of your irrational conclusions. No one expects anything of you.
By posting it here the poster invited comments... That is how this place works.
nobody placed any demands on you not to kiss. They didn't even tell you it was a sin. You assumed that, like you always assume. It's very illogical.
No one is preventing you from doing anything.
To keep these kids in the closet is only asking for trouble when they grow up and have no one to ask.
You have to tell them the truth.
Sure, kissing may lead sex but not necessarily.
Teach control.
Teach why sex with someone you don't want kids with can lead to some consequences.
To put so many things off limits will only spark more curiosity and thus the inevitable rebellion.
Someone needs to look at these known facts that all psychologists can show statistically.