Sarah Palin had Targeted Gabrielle Giffords with Gun Sights

http://jeffdunham.ticketloot.com/

William Robinson Jeffrey "Jeff" Dunham (born April 18, 1962) is an American ventriloquist and comedian, who also appeared in TV shows including Late Show with David Letterman, Comedy Central Presents, The Tonight Show and Sonny With a chance.

But lets not forget one more group of “professional” reporters who love the “Southern Poverty Law Center.”
Remember Joe Stack, a disturbed man who crashed his small plane into an IRS building in Austin, Texas back in February, was not known to have any ties to any tea party group, any “patriot” group, or other right-wing groups. His manifesto reads like a confused communist rant with hate for the U.S. government and George W. Bush liberally sprinkled throughout. But NPR lumps this nut in with the right with claims that they are all dangerous to government officials and facilities.
NPR similarly uses as proof of these dangerous patriots the disturbed actions of John Patrick Bedell who opened fire on officers near the Pentagon on March 4. Bedell was an anti-war protestor, heavy marijuana user, and exhibited paranoia for which he refused to seek medical help. Bedell also has no known ties to tea party groups, any political organizations, or NPR’s frightening “patriot groups.”
Yet NPR put forth both of these sick-minded men as examples of “patriots” that have become dangerous and unstable. If NPR wasn’t saying so why include them in this report?
Naturally for its “expert” on dangerous patriots NPR turns to Mark Potok, the director of the liberal Southern Poverty Law Center. As always, Potok cites claims of a “huge growth in the so-called patriot movement that includes militias out there.” Not that NPR offers any actual proof other than Potok’s say so, of course. “We’ve seen in particular a huge growth in the so-called patriot movement that includes militias out there,” Potok says. “And I think that some of the violence that we’ve seen, such as the Pentagon shooter and the IRS, are at least in some way a reflection of that rage.” Potok says there are now more than 500 patriot and militia groups active in the U.S., more than triple the number in 2008. Again, NPR trots out Potok to warn of those evil, evil right-wing patriots and tries to back his claims up with two crazy people that have no ties at all to those same right-wing patriot groups that are being blamed for this “upsurge” in violence.
What NPR doesn’t tell you is the sort of people that work wt. the SPLC. Chip Berlet, for instance, is one of those people. Berlet has all sorts of extremist, left-wing associates (like anti-American billionaire financier George Soros) and is a member of other far left organizations such as the Socialist Workers Party. Here is an entry on Berlet in discoverthenetwork.org nestled in a page about the left-wing Tides Foundation: Berlet is a senior analyst for Political Research Associates, and has had affiliations with the American Civil Liberties Union, the American Friends Service Committee, the Christic Institute, the Socialist Workers Party, the National Lawyers Guild, and the Southern Poverty Law Center. To show how unbiased SLPC’s Chip Berlet is, he once wrote that, “right-wing foundations and think tanks support efforts to make bigoted and discredited ideas respectable.” Not too biased there, eh?
Discoverthenetwork.org also has a page on the SPLC itself.
So, for its expert on those monstrous patriot groups, NPR turns to a group that has ties to the Socialist Workers Party, George Soros, and the anti-Christian ACLU and then expects us to think such an organization should be accepted as an unbiased news source! Apparently NPR does expect us all to accept as gospel its left-biased report on how dangerous those “patriots” are, but I hope America is more skeptical than that.
Remember folks, our tax dollars support NPR.

When Dianne Feinstein (D.-Hell) brandished an AK-type semiauto rifle at Congress (finger on trigger) and said "I have to tell you, I feel like taking some of you [opponents of gun bans]out," that must have been what? An invitation to go to the shooting range for a little friendly sport?
The Democrat candidates placed bull's-eye targets over districts they wanted to win. In THEIR case, it's obviously figurative, not a threat of violence. But Sarah Palin has been on TV with a gun in her hands. Sarah Palin is a self-described "rogue." (Never mind that she's about as much a "rogue Republican" as my dead grandmother.)
Dianne Feinstein has a concealed carry handgun permit for DC and the CAPITOL.
Nancy Pelosi said trying to rescind Obamacare is "an act of violence." Disagreeing with the Powers That Be is insane, you see, and putting your disagreement in the form of a vote is "violent." Their attitude is the same as Jeff Dunham's Achmed the Dead Terrorist dummy. "Silence! I keel you!"

---- back in the horse now, for Polar Cow, and the like of her.
This particular shooter could have picked anyone, he hated everyone it seems.
Bring the Nut Houses back!
What puzzles me is.
A US Congresswoman and a Federal Judge no police officer's.
These threats have existed for some time.
Who's call was it to have or not have Police Officers at this event?

Do liberals know the difference between figurative and literal?

Huffington Post headline:

Democrats Target Tea Party-Backed Candidates On Social Issues

Could be interpreted lots of ways, huh?
Printer's registration marks and nautical architects' center-of-effort markers look like crosshairs too.

With these types of accusations.

What is not commonly discussed is:

-- According to the shooter's Youtube page, this guy was a revolutionary and an atheist. He seemed paranoid about Government mind control and brainwashing.

-- He was being recruited into the military and was upset about having received a mini-bible.

-- He looks down upon the many people in the 8th district, calling them "illiterate".

-- He is heavily anti-government, especially against U.S. Currency, and thinks paying for college is "unconstitutional".

http://www.youtube.com/user/Classitup10 #p/a/u/1/nHoaZaLbqB4

Also not discussed is the fact that Rep. Giffords is a moderate/conservative "Blue Dog" Democrat. She is all for securing our southern border, gun rights, space exploration, and other conservative values.

The ignoble leap being made in the liberal areas of the blogosphere are baseless knee-jerk reactions by those who have formed their opinion without having the facts. Or, in other words: Business as usual.