Republicans Block Oil Drilling Safety Reforms

Remember the Deepwater Horizon oil spill? I sure do. It poisoned the waters of the Gulf of Mexico, killing millions of fish and other aquatic life in the process. It ruined and hampered the businesses of thousands of individuals. Indeed, there are people still struggling to get paid for the screw-up by BP and Transocean.

Indeed, a report by the U.S. Coast Guard stated about the leadup to the spill and what allowed it to be caused:

"These included poor maintenance of electrical equipment that may have ignited the explosion, bypassing of gas alarms and automatic shutdown systems that could prevent an explosion, and lack of training of personnel on when and how to shut down engines and disconnect the [Deepwater Horizon] from the well to avoid a gas explosion and mitigate the damage from an explosion and fire."

What nation was this platform registered to and technically at least, in charge of safety inspections? The Marshall Islands, or a group of islands with a national GNP lower than the value of the platform itself. A group of islands halfway across the globe from where the platform was located, and was supposed to ensure to regulate it for safety. Absurd, of course. The only reason the platform, as is common practice against differing industries, was registered to the Marshall Islands was because it allowed for little or no oversite for the its corporate owners.

The fact is, digging for oil under a mile of ocean is risky. It's not easy and there are environmental, economical and health risks if it goes wrong. This is one of the reasons we have a U.S. Congress, which after the reasons for a big spill become known, should step in to ensure that the risk of such accidents are reduced. But, unfortunately Republicans in Congress voted overwhelmingly to block any reform and regulation of oil drilling since this horrendous spill.

Last year they blocked to increase the liability of oil companies who pollute our nation's waters and oceans with their spills. They have opposed the disclosure of chemicals used in fracking for natural gas. I think drilling should be part of our energy solution, but why is one of our major political parties ignoring common sense solutions? Did they not see the platform on fire last year? Did they not see the beaches littered with oil sludge? It is one thing to be the party of big business, it is another thing for those elected officials to vote no differently than if the corporate exectutives themselves were in office.

They say they are pro-business, but don't they care about the small businesses harmed by such a spill? Do they not care about the fishing industries or the tourism industries, or the other industries harmed?

They aren't the party of business. They are the party of large, influential and large donor businesses.

Edwin Drake's picture

He never said the bills would increase safety per se. You're resorting to a cheap debating tactic meant to shunt aside the main thesis of his argument by your petty badgering of him on a minor point which a) he never even said and which b) you are only pretending is important to the whole argument.

And calling him a "dickhead" isn't actually endearing yourself to him.

His main argument is that certain Republican leaders consistently strike down any legislation which might hurt profits for large oil corporations. Therefore, those leaders are not serving their vast constituencies and are instead serving a select group of a few private albeit powerful businessmen. Those Republicans are most likely bought and paid for by Big Oil. If so, then they have a conflict of interest and should be drummed out of office.

So instead of harping repeatedly upon something he never even said, how about you address his main thesis instead:

"Certain Republican Leaders Legislatively Bow Down Before Large Oil Companies With Unwavering Loyalty And Consistency, And Protect Those Companies' Profits At The Expense of the American Citizenry".

Or are you likewise bought and paid for by Big Oil?

Edwin Drake's picture

His main argument is that certain GOP office-holders are owned by Big Oil. He then offers his evidence to that claim. Deal with it. Deal with THAT argument and ONLY that argument. Something tells me you can't deal with it. You're incapable of dealing with it. So you focus on partial pieces of the whole and scream irationally when you think you've found a flaw. But your inability to see the big picture makes you a poor debater and probably also makes you an incompetent citizen of the sort whose votes are never cast for the greater good, --not even cast for your own good. Your votes are likely only ever cast for whatever the latest talking point was that you think you heard once.

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

 

randomness