Will Mormonism Ever be Accepted in America?

Share This Story

article image

The Mormon faith has gotten more attention in the last couple of years than most could have anticipated. Aside from the ad campaign promoted by the Mormon Church to portray Mormons as everyday folks, other events have eclipsed this more calculated effort to mold public opinion.

Trey Parker and Matt Stone, creators of Southpark, have penned a runaway Broadway hit called The Book of Mormon. Though highly irreverent, the message ultimately comes down to this: does it really matter if some find the beliefs absurd, if in the end, the adherents to Mormonism feel it makes their lives and the world better because of it?

Rather profound, coming from a pair of atheist cartoonists.

Then there’s Mitt Romney. It seems the only thing holding the GOP front-runner back from certain victory at this point is his Mormon faith. Polls show that evangelical Christians are struggling with the idea of swallowing hard and voting for a Mormon, given the option between that an a Democrat.

I suppose it helps put everything in perspective, right?

So Mormonism, the only truly American-born major religion, finds itself front-and-center in the public spotlight, whether indented or not. I’ll spare readers the history lesson and will assume most folks know the basics of what Mormonism is about. But there are some key points on which most people’s discomfort with the faith seem to rest.

For one, there’s the whole polygamy thing. Though Brigham Young and Joseph Smith both advocated for, and practiced, polygamy (AKA, plural marriage), the church has since distanced itself from this practice. Though most assume this rejection of polygamy is strategic – if not legally necessary – Mormon leaders claim today at least that they view the practice as morally wrong.

Also, to put it gently, the Mormon church has a spotty record with ethnic minorities. Though current media ads depict folks of all ethnic and racial backgrounds, most folks recognize that non-Anglos have historically been seen as “less than” by the Mormon Church.

Somewhat related to the first issue is the larger issue of the church’s treatment of women. Evangelicals have little room to criticize here, however, since they similarly limit the role of women in roles of leadership and ministry. But mainline and progressive religious folks, along with secularists, would generally agree that this antiquated perspective on women’s place in the world is well out of step with cultural norms.

Though these are not insignificant issues, I’d argue that they could be overcome in the court of public opinion, given enough time and calculated public relations efforts. But there’s the matter of the beliefs and practices of Mormonism themselves that may be the ultimate barrier that keeps Mormonism from ever going truly mainstream.

There’s an aura of secrecy around the faith that many find off-putting. One has to demonstrate certain markers of faithfulness before some of the innerworkings of the faith are revealed. But in a world where institutional transparency is held at a premium, this just doesn’t fly with non-Mormons.

There’s also the broader perception that many beliefs of Mormonism are, well, just kinda weird. From Joseph Smith reading holy tablets in a hat with his magic glasses to Jesus appearing in what is now the United states after his resurrection, there’s plenty that simply doesn’t sit well with those looking in from the outside.

Now, I should point out here that Mormonism unfairly suffers from the liability of being the out-lier here. After all, traditional Christianity has equally weird stories if we take a step back and really look at it. From people walking on water to rising from the dead, talking bushes on fire and oceans splitting in half, there’s plenty of fantastical imagery throughout the Bible. Catholics and Protestants simply have the benefit of being considered the baseline by which religious “normal” is determined.

But here’s the thing: I’d argue that Biblical literalists and those who adhere to the fundamental tenets of how they interpret scripture and the Christian faith are generally seen as equally weird in an increasingly rational (arguably secular) world. There are those who understand many Christian stories more metaphorically rather than literally, but the difference between Mormonism and the rest of Christianity seems to be the very existence of a breadth of interpretation.

Let me try to restate this in simpler terms. Whereas most Christians recognize that there’s room in the faith to interpret and practice our beliefs in a number of different ways, there’s an emphasis in Mormonism on homogeneity that is starkly counter-cultural. Basically, you are to believe what “The Mormon Church” states as the beliefs and values of all Mormons, or you’re not a Mormon.

It’s this hard-line fundamentalism that may ultimately be the wedge that keeps Mormons from being viewed as part of mainstream American culture. All of the other, more sensational, issues can be ameliorated, but rigid fundamentalism simply doesn’t fly in today’s America.

-----------------

Christian Piatt is an author, editor, speaker, musician and spoken word artist. He co-founded Milagro Christian Church in Pueblo, Colorado with his wife, Rev. Amy Piatt, in 2004.

Christian is the creator and editor of "Banned Questions About The Bible" and "Banned Questions About Jesus." He has a memoir on faith, family and parenting being published in early 2012 called "PREGMANCY: A Dad, a Little Dude and a Due Date." For more information about Christian, visit www.christianpiatt.com, or find him on Twitter or Facebook.

Share This Story

`
janet44p's picture

I think that that is what makes the U.S. great. You have believe what you want here. This is such a great country.

jamiei's picture

This is very interesting and helpful. With the type of job I have I need to stay informed and this was just what I needed. Check it out!

PJ's picture

I don't care if people choose to be Mormon. It isn't harming anyone. They are not committing homicide bombings or any other acts of violence. Why would being a Mormon even be an issue? I live in a predominately Mormon/Baptist community. We all get along just fine. As a matter of fact, I know a few people who were very down and out and it was the Mormon church that came to help them from everything to raking leaves, building fence, providing them food and getting their vehicle out of hock. I choose my own faith but have nothing against Mormons at all. Yes they are door knockers but it is quite easy to simply say, "No thank you".

stockball's picture

When it comes to voting for a candidate, it shouldn't be an issue. Now obviously, if I were a Christian church hiring a preacher, than it might be an issue...

Duwayne Anderson's picture

Religions routinely touch on subjects that are of interest to the general public, and that can/do affect public policy. It seems fair to ask candidates how their religious "faith" would affect their behavior in office with regard to those public issues. With regard to Romney, here are some questions that I think are valid, and which I think Romney should answer:

1) Mr. Romney, between 1985 -1994 you were an active member of the LDS Church. During that time Mr. Benson was president of the church, and as an active temple-going member of the church you sustained Mr. Benson as a “prophet, seer, and revelator.” Mr. Benson was also an unapologetic racist who said that the Civil Rights movement was part of a communist plot. What should Americans make of your sustaining vote for Mr. Benson? Did you then, or ever, sympathize with the racist views of the prophet you sustained?

http://www.exmormon.org/mormon/mormon409.htm

It would be relevant to ask a question like this, if a presidential candidate belonged to the KKK. It should be just as relevant if they supported *any* racist organization.

2) Mr. Romney, in a related question, as a temple-going member of the LDS Church you affirm your belief in the Book of Mormon. Do you agree with the verse in 2 Nephi 5:21, which describes god cursing people with a “skin of blackness?” How might your belief in those verses affect your ability to serve as President to the millions of Black Americans?

http://lds.org/scriptures/bofm/2-ne/5.21?lang=eng#20

2) Mr. Romney, most of us are aware of how Mr. Reagan used Astrology in his decision-making process. You also have deeply held religious views. To what extent will you allow your religious feelings and inclinations to influence your judgment if you are elected president?

http://catalytic-diplomacy.org/everymanPDFs/Ch19.pdf

Does anyone seriously suggest that it’s not relevant if the guy with his finger on the bomb is looking for answers in tea leaves?

3) Mr. Romney, peace has long evaded the Middle East. One of the most contentious issues surrounding the Middle East is the Israeli occupation and population of lands taken during the 1967 war. One of the articles of your church states that: “We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in the restoration of the Ten Tribes…” As president, to what extent would your religious beliefs regarding the “literal gathering of Israel” influence your approach to peace in the Middle East, and the occupied lands?

http://lds.org/library/display/0,4945,106-1-2-1,FF.html

Finally (because it's bound to come up) the Constitution forbids a religious test for office. This means there can be no laws that say things like "Mormons are disqualified from running for office." That, however, is fundamentally different from citizens rejecting a candidate on the grounds that their religious convictions would do harm to public policy.

Duwayne Anderson Author of “Farewell to Eden: Coming to terms with Mormonism and science”

Duwayne Anderson Author of "Farewell to Eden: Coming to terms with Mormonism and science"

x1134x's picture

If any of your "givens" were factual, you'd have a point.

Man who stands on toilet, is high on pot.

kirsten25v's picture

Every religion is accepted in America. Its in the constitution. If people just kept to themselves they wouldn't have any problems.

brianna37i's picture

I agree that we all have the right to believe what we want here. That is what makes America so great.

Duwayne Anderson's picture

Article VI says: "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

Clearly, that doesn't say that "every religion is accepted in America." Nor does it say/imply that a person's wackadoodle religous ideas are not fair game when determining whether or not that person is fit for public office. It simply says that *Congress* can't make a religious test. It doesn't say individual voters can't, or shouldn't.

Duwayne Anderson Author of "Farewell to Eden: Coming to terms with Mormonism and science"

Duwayne Anderson's picture

What "givens" are not factual?

Did you bother to follow the links?

Duwayne Anderson Author of "Farewell to Eden: Coming to terms with Mormonism and science"

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

OV Social

 

randomness