In an email to members on Thursday, the conservative Christian-based Family Research Council tried to link the Boston Marathon bombing to “the government’s own hostility to the institution of the family” and “abortion, family breakdown, sexual liberalism, or religious hostility.”
The email also tried to link the Boston Marathon bombing to “the government’s own hostility to the institution of the family” and “abortion, family breakdown, sexual liberalism, or religious hostility.”
The Family Research Council then claimed that a gun background check would not have stopped the Boston Marathon bombing, however, they failed to note that no mainstream gun control advocates have ever suggested that it would have.
Popular VideoThis judge looked an inmate square in the eyes and did something that left the entire courtroom in tears:
In the aftermath of horrible tragedies like Newtown, the government desperately wants to do something--even if that something is the wrong thing. There seems to be this notion, at least among liberals, that more laws will protect us--but as we all witnessed in Boston, that isn't necessarily the case.
The government can't make us safer until it recognizes that the problem isn't the instruments of violence--but the environment of it. Stronger background checks wouldn't have prevented the deaths of three people at the finish line on Monday, any more than it would have stopped Floyd Corkins from walking into our lobby and shooting Leo Johnson.
If Congress wants to stop these tragedies, then it has to address the government's own hostility to the institution of the family and organizations that can address the real problem: the human heart. As I've said before, America doesn't need gun control, it needs self-control. And a Congress that actively discourages it--through abortion, family breakdown, sexual liberalism, or religious hostility--is only compounding the problem.