New York Times Makes Excuses for Islam

article image

Catholic League president Bill Donohue notices a glaring omission in Friday’s The New York Times:

I read with interest the front-page story in Friday's The New York Times about the plight of a woman in Afghanistan who was raped and then ordered to marry her rapist. The reporter spoke about this outcome as a “cultural practice,” showing “the power of cultural norms,” reflecting an “Afghan custom.”

All of this is accurate, but incomplete. As a sociologist, I noticed something missing: never once was there any mention that this “cultural practice” is rooted in Islam. Religion, of course, is the most defining element in any culture, and not to cite Islam—and particularly Shariah—is irresponsible. It would be like discussing culture in Ireland or Latin America without mentioning Catholicism.

They even have a Department for Prevention of Vice and Promotion of Virtue in Afghanistan which enforces Shariah laws. The New York Times deserves credit for publishing this story, but it discredits itself when it intentionally omits the root cause of the oppression of women in Afghanistan.

call me Roy's picture

Speaker Pelosi: Stand Up for Muslim Women, Not Islamists Like Rauf! An open letter from the founder and president of the Alliance of Iranian Women. September 5, 2010 - by Manda Zand Ervin Honorable Speaker Pelosi: I heard you say that the people who oppose the construction of the Ground Zero mosque should be investigated. Investigate me. I oppose the construction of that mosque. This mosque, built in such close proximity to Ground Zero, is intended to send a message to America and another message to the Muslims who are gravitating toward human rights laws and secularism. We are sure that this mosque will cause nothing but division and justified ill will towards Muslims in this country. I came to America as a political refugee, fleeing from the Islamic rule in Iran that subsumed a secular, woman-respecting government. As a human, woman, and a mother, I could not live under nor subject my daughter to such brutal, barbarian tyranny. What I see now occurring in my new home, America, is Islamists forcing their policies in bits and pieces, here and there. It is terribly disconcerting, not only to me but to all Iranian Americans and the large majority of Muslims who came to America to live in peace, freedom, and prosperity. Madam Speaker: The Islamists are using the laws of this greatest of democracies to implement their ideology in any way they can — whether by propaganda, intimidation, the misuse of political correctness or anti-discrimination policies, or the minority status that this society puts at their disposal. Plus the most powerful of all tools, the money — the limitless petrodollars coming from foreign Islamist dictators with anti-democratic agendas. Because the American Constitution calls for the separation of religion and government, the Justice Department, the ACLU, and others constantly minimize the influence Christianity and Judaism have on American secular society. What we, American Muslims, wonder: why is there an exception for Islam from the rules applied to others, even though the Islamic human rights record is deeply problematic and contrary to all the civil rights and individual rights laws of this great republic? Why is Islam given a pass that is not given to Christianity or Judaism? Madam Speaker: You are a powerful woman in the world, but you don’t care much about the human rights of hundreds of millions of women and children who need the support of the people like you to gain their individual freedom. You claim to be for the women’s right to choose, but then you ignore the right of women and children to have human dignity! A large majority of America’s Muslims, women and girls, are living under sharia laws. Stripped of their human dignity. You support the construction of the mosque but you don’t support the women and girls who are forced to wear hijabs against their will. Muslim women and girls live in seclusion, on the fringes of society, without recourse because of their families’ religion. In the name of religious freedom, political correctness in America only pleases the patriarchal hierarchy of the Muslim world. In the name of religious freedom, America permits Muslim communities to run a state within a state, perpetuating the patriarchal crimes against helpless women and children who should have their constitutional rights defended. When “Muslim men” are given extra privileges that are definitely not granted to those of other religions, my Muslim sisters and I see this as the gravest discrimination committed in America. Madam Speaker: We came to America to live in peace and harmony with Americans. We don’t want to be identified by our religion. We want to be identified by our cultures and the content of our characters. We want to be Americans, not Muslim-Americans. We don’t want our girls forced by their fathers to wear hijabs, and to be embarrassed among their peers in American schools. We want to be free to practice — or not practice — our religion. We also want to be free to “choose.” Unfortunately, politicians like you have chosen to cater to the worst among us — the Muslim dictators and the so-called community leaders. Ignoring the rest of us, Muslim women and children, as if we don’t exist. The Islamists will not stop until Islam rules the world. Ayatollah Khomeini declared that Iran was a platform toward a Muslim world. All of us American Muslims know that this is the most democratic country on Earth, and we are well aware of the Constitution and the meaning of freedom of religion in America. We luxuriate in that freedom, and we celebrate it, and we defend it. You know well that the question here is not freedom of religion, or respect for Muslims! This is nothing but pure politics — sacrificing humanity in the name of religion for the sake of ideological politics. We want America to treat Islam like it treats Christianity and Judaism, and to stop exempting Muslims from requirements imposed on others. We want Islam to be challenged by the same questioning, criticism, and control that is applied to other religions. Please stop pampering Islam to appease the terrorists and dictators. Madam Speaker: The Age of Enlightenment changed the face of Judaism and Christianity, but Islam remains trapped in the 6th century. Here we have the Constitution and law. Apply it evenly to all — no exceptions for Islam. Support freedom from religion for the women and children suffering under Islamic law in America. Manda Zand Ervin is the founder and the president of the Alliance of Iranian women. She was the U.S. delegate to the UN Commission on the Status of Women in 2008.

RockyMissouri's picture

A Christian theocracy is as vile as any other......

Jerome McCollom's picture

For once, I agree with the Catholic League. As a humanist I strongly oppose the religious rightwing in America. They wish to impose a form of theocracy in America. Santorum believes America belongs to his deity, not to the American people. But, I also strongly oppose the theocrats in the Islamic world. What that part of the world needs above everything else, are secular leaders. People of reason, not people of faith. People of science, not people of religious dogma or doctrine. So, just like a broken clock that is right twice a day, so too can the Catholic League. Just waiting for the other time they are right.

Jerome McCollom

Christopher Gerstle's picture

I never thought I'd say this, but I agree wholeheartedly with the Catholic League (atheist here). For the New York Times to tolerate the rape and forced marriage of a woman by bowing down to cultural relativism is utter shameful.

Tiexiongji's picture

Totally agree. It is a theocratic nation run by their crazy book. It is very great that our country is not based on such kind of bs. Thanks for pointing out the dangers of theocracy.

Everything I do, I do it for you.

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

 

randomness