By Rory Cooper
It has become conventional wisdom that President Obama tries very hard to be all things to all people when he gives a speech these days. While it often makes for excellent oratory, it rarely inspires action or advocacy on his behalf. In fact, after his recent address on Afghanistan, given at West Point, there was widespread criticism from both sides of the aisle over some of the policy, and most of the substance. Simply put, the nation cannot be led through a war or a recession by simply filling in the blanks, Mad-Lib style, to suit every audience. In a fact check of the President’s economic speech delivered at the Brookings Institute headlined “Obama Likes Both Sides of an Argument,” the Associated Press said the following:
Under law, any paybacks to the bailout known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program must be used to reduce the deficit. But in an economic speech on Tuesday, the president sought to have it both ways. Increased repayments from banks to the Treasury will reduce the deficit all right, but it will give Congress the budgetary room to spend more—and the president encouraged just that.
President Obama would like you to believe that Congress has the room to spend more money simply because money borrowed in the first place is statutorily being repaid to the loaning U.S. taxpayer. So on the one hand, TARP works because the money is getting repaid, and on the other hand Congress has money to spend because TARP money is being repaid. President Obama said: “There are those who claim we have to choose between paying down our deficits on the one hand, and investing in job creation and economic growth on the other. But this is a false choice.” But there is nothing false about the difference between spending money and not spending money. You cannot reduce the deficit by spending more money, plain and simple. This is a far greater danger in the face of Rep. Barney Frank’s (D-MA) plan to create a permanent TARP.
Popular VideoThis young teenage singer was shocked when Keith Urban invited her on stage at his concert. A few moments later, he made her wildest dreams come true.
Thankfully, the AP also called out the President for some other misnomers in today’s economic speech saying: “It wasn’t the president’s only attempt at having his cake and eating it, too, in his speech.” President Obama, the blamer-in-chief, also echoed his favorite line that these problems are inherited, and he’s simply trying to solve them. However, this ignores his own votes and positions of support as a U.S. Senator and presidential candidate and his party’s control of Congress between 2006 and 2008 when most of the current economic plans were put in place.
President Obama then spoke of how his stimulus package had created 1.6 million jobs, citing a CBO report. The AP correctly points out that the CBO report was not so rosy, and offered “numerous caveats.” In reality, since President Obama took office, U.S. employment has dropped by 3.3 million jobs. The President’s promises at the time of the Stimulus debate set a target of 138.6 million jobs in the U.S. by 2010. The President is 7.6 million jobs short of this goal according to data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
Finally, the AP called out the President for taking credit for a rosier education economy. Obama said he had made “college more affordable.” In fact, his proposals in Congress would slow the historical growth rates of Pell Grants and shift money away from prospective college students and into other education priorities for his administration. To be sure, these priorities do not include 1,715 extremely disadvantaged children residing in Washington, DC. President Obama chose to cut the funding for the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program which allowed these kids to choose schools that aided their education rather than schools that only offered a dangerous environment that didn’t support their efforts to someday make it to college. An opportunity that President Obama himself had and chose for his own family.
The President would like you to leave every speech thinking that he spoke directly to you through the glare of his TelePrompters. However, when reality meets rhetoric, the speeches leave much to be desired, as the AP ably pointed out today.