- Home
- Politics
- Entertainment
- Sports
- Health
- Religion
- Society
- Tech
- Money
- People
- Science
- Galleries
Poll -- Half of Americans Think Homosexuality Morally Wrong
WASHINGTON -- Homosexual characters may be increasing in number on television and "gay marriage" may be advancing in left-leaning states, but half of Americans still think homosexuality is "morally wrong" and few find it "morally acceptable," a new Pew Research poll finds.
The survey of 4,013 adults in August shows that 49 percent say that homosexuality is morally wrong, 9 percent morally acceptable and 35 percent say it is not a moral issue. That's little changed from a February 2006 Pew poll, when 50 percent said it was morally wrong, 12 percent morally acceptable and 33 percent said it was not a moral issue.
The polls are mostly in line with Gallup surveys from the past eight years, where anywhere from between 48 and 55 percent of Americans have said they found homosexuality to be "morally wrong."
Among races, blacks in the Pew poll were most likely to say homosexuality is morally wrong (64 percent morally wrong, 5 percent morally acceptable), followed by whites (48 percent, 8 percent, respectively) and Hispanics (43 percent, 15 percent).
The poll also found that among all adults, 53 percent oppose "gay marriage" and 39 percent support it. Blacks again led the way in opposition, with 66 percent saying they oppose changing the definition of marriage; 52 percent of whites and 49 percent of Hispanics said likewise.
Additionally, 57 percent of all adults favor and 37 percent oppose "allowing gay and lesbian couples to enter into legal agreements with each other that would give them many of the same rights as married couples." The wording references civil unions, which have been used in three states (Connecticut, New Hampshire and Vermont) as a stepping stone to legalizing "gay marriage." Including Maine -- where the law has yet to take effect and where voters will consider the issue Nov. 3 -- legislatures in three states (New Hampshire and Vermont are the others) have passed laws legalizing "gay marriage." In Connecticut, Iowa and Massachusetts, courts legalized it.
The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) on Oct. 1 released its annual "Where We Are on TV" report, showing that 3 percent of all scripted, regular characters in the 2009-10 broadcast TV season are homosexual. That's up from 2.6 percent in 2008, 1.1 percent in 2007 and 1.3 percent in 2006. The 3 percent amounts to 18 total characters on ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox and The CW.
Four shows have lead homosexual characters: ABC's "Brothers & Sisters" (character, Kevin Walker), "Grey's Anatomy (Callie Torres) and "Modern Family" (Mitchell Cameron) and The CW's "Melrose Place" (Ella Simms).
Among the supporting homosexual characters is Roger the Alien on Fox's animated show "American Dad."
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter





Comments
In the eye of the beholder...
Morality, like beauty or ugliness or any other matter of opinion, is exactly that: a matter of opinion. People are free to think homosexuality is not moral, I am free to life my life as a gay person without being persecuted, preached to or told I'm not leading a good life. I would advise all those religious nuts out there to please keep their religion to themselves. I would also say that, as a liberal Christian, not all Christians are like Baptist Press or Christian News Wire. Most of us are open-minded people who just happen to believe in God without all the bullshit that fundamentalists get on with.
It shouldn't matter
what the general populace think. The morality of any relationship involving consenting adults is exclusively a matter for the parties to that relationship. End of story. This poll serves no useful purpose other than to gauge the degree to which the average person feels qualified to judge the morality of other people's relationships.
I don't know...
Personally I think any relationship that engages in sexual practices outside the bonds of marriage is immoral. Especially if one of the partners is married. That's another case though.
Thank you for helping prove my point
You've just volunteered yourself as an example of what I'm talking about. There are many who feel that other people's personal lives are somehow their business and that they are qualified to make moral judgments upon them or to pronounce that some deity makes such judgments. Of course, it's not your business at all but you feel that it is, probably (allthough you haven't explicitly mentioned this) because that's what your religion tells you and you just know no better.
If your religion tells you that sexual activity outside of marriage is "immoral", that assessment is a matter for your own relationships and no others, apart perhaps from those of any children you may have whom have not yet reached the age of majority. It may have escaped your notice, but not everyone follows your religion and many follow no religion at all.
Yes but...
While it's true that people should be focused on their own lives in terms of what is right or wrong that doesn't mean that they can't think that homosexuality is wrong. That being said, thinking it is wrong gives them no license to persecute, assail, etc. someone who is participating in something they disagree with. I disagree with a lot of people but I don't confront them about it. Having diverse opinions is what makes this country great.
Yes, they can think what they like
But homosexuality can't logically be argued to be "wrong", since it's something that doesn't harm anybody and anyway, isn't a choice (by 'harm' of course, I mean actual harm rather than any perceived spiritual or other imagined harm). It's simply in the nature of some human beings to be attracted to their own gender and allthough people are free to think whatever they like, it's a pity if they choose to label the lives of others as "wrong" without any real justification, even if it's only in their own heads. Good people always get along just fine if they're open to overlooking one another's more contentious traits. But you can't really do that if that good person is gay and you have decided that's inherently "wrong".
Slight correction
I got a little carried away at the end and forgot that this article/site is viewed by more than just U.S. citizens. In reality though, opposing views are what make this world interesting.
Silly me
I was under the impression that morality was an ethical code existing for the purpose of maintaining life and liberty, not a personal opinion based on what one finds gross, icky, or conflicting with arbitrarily founded religious babble.
Silly me.
Well
Well, yes, you're correct, but it's actually both. But the personal "morality" based upon what one finds gross, icky or irreligious is not supposed to impact legislation or the rights of others to decide for themselves what they find gross, icky or irreligious.
The moral codes upon which government is supposed to be based are those which determine at what point one ceases to exercise one's own personal rights and freedoms and begins to infringe upon the rights and freedoms of others. That is the sole level of morality in which government rightfully has an interest.
If...
If people consider same-gender relationships immoral, then they should not engage in same-gender relationships. Pretty simply, no?
The question is, why is someone's opinion about the morality of my relationship to my spouse a "national issue?" My relationship to my spouse is none of their business. Anymore than their relationship to their spouse is any of my business, so long as they are not abusing spouse or children .