Video: Rick Santorum Lectures Mother of Sick Child, Defends High Cost of U.S. Drugs

article image

Speaking in Woodland Park, Colorado on Tuesday, Republican presidential candidate and self-proclaimed Christian, Rick Santorum told the mother of a child with a rare genetic disorder that she shouldn’t have a problem paying $1 million a year for the prescription drug Abilify because Apple’s iPad can cost around $900 (video below).

Santorum said: “People have no problem paying $900 for an iPad. But paying $900 for a drug they have a problem with it keeps you alive. Why? Because you’ve been conditioned to think health care is something you can get without having to pay for it.”

Santorum then repeated the talking point often used by Big Pharma: “Look, I want your son and everybody to have the opportunity to stay alive on much-needed drugs. But the bottom line is, we have to give companies the incentive to make those drugs. And if they don’t have the incentive to make those drugs, your son won’t be alive and lots of other people in this country won’t be alive.”

Except Santorum is plain wrong. Many drugs have been discovered without financial incentive, including the polio vaccine which was discovered by Jonas Salk. Santorum also failed to mention that many countries in Europe have discovered groundbreaking vaccines which sell for much less that U.S. drugs because they are subsidized by their governments.

video platform video management video solutions video player

Anonymous Gamer's picture

"When you're wealthy, it doesn't matter what things cost, gasoline, food, or healthcare, as long as you can get all you want."

I think that's the problem, the U.S. treats medical care like it's a luxury when it's actually a necessity. They also seem to be the only country with this highly flawed attitude. BTW, James, I can't watch that video because Vimeo is inaccessible on Android. Got a copy on YouTube?

Do not underestimate the Power of Autism

James Smith's picture

You're right. It is not a commodity like refrigerators or sports cars. Those are things we can live without if we must.

I've uploaded the video to www.tubewatcher.tv at: http://www.tubewatcher.tv/6944 and the one aboout the NHS in the UK at: http://www.tubewatcher.tv/14695

I've had serious problems with YouTube and am withdrawing from there totally. Vimeo and Tubewatcher.tv have been much more effective for me.

Vimeo isn't accessible on Android? I've never heard that before. What are you using for a browser? I have been considering an Android tablet so inaccessible web sites would definitely keep me using a laptop for travel.

If freedom means anything, it is the liberty to tell others what they do not want to hear.

Anonymous Gamer's picture

Thanks for those addresses. I think the problem may be with Opera Mini, because I can't access sites like Vimeo that require the Flash 9 plugin, which I've got. I believe the problem's with Opera, but without it, I,d be so high above my fair usage limit from T-Mobile. I use the Samsung Galaxy Apollo.

Do not underestimate the Power of Autism

James Smith's picture

I've never used Opera so that's all a mystery to me. I have Firefox and Safari. I have noticed some sites the commenting feature doesn't work in FF, but is fine with Safari. Another mystery, no?

Being in Brazil, I wouldn't have the problem with T-mobile and would use my private WiFi at home and public WiFi when away. Mostly, I would use a tablet for the 900+ eBooks I have. I'm happy with my elderly Mac G4 13" Powerbook, but something lighter for travel would be good.

If freedom means anything, it is the liberty to tell others what they do not want to hear.

Anonymous Gamer's picture

"When government becomes involved in health care costs do not always go orbital."

Agreed. The British Government took over healthcare in the UK in 1948, and the result is that in an emergency, you can just go to the local ED and receive treatment. No insurance? No problem!

Do not underestimate the Power of Autism

James Smith's picture

Technically, you can do the same thing in the USA. No E.R. can refuse treatment because of lack of medical coverage. Unfortunately, many E.Rs are filled with people with colds, hang-overs and children with non-emergency conditions but no insurance and no visible means of support. That's one reason why charges for the E.R. are so high. we are paying the costs for all the people working the system.

FWIW, you might like this video http://vimeo.com/26215039 it's about the NHS in the UK and how it was started and the philosophy behind it.

If freedom means anything, it is the liberty to tell others what they do not want to hear.

Babaroni's picture

Actually, James, that's not exactly correct. ERs are only mandated to treat emergency conditions to the point where the patient is stabilized and can be transferred safely to another facility which offers indigent medical care. If a patient's condition is non-emergent and the patient either has no insurance or the hospital does not accept the patient's insurance (such as Medicare/Medicaid), the hospital is not required to treat. They can refer the patient to the nearest hospital which does accept the patient's insurance/Medicare/Medicaid, or which offers indigent care.

That's why publically-funded universal healthcare is so incredibly important. You can find yourself with cancer and in need of surgery, radiation and/or chemo, and no hospital will treat you, because you don't have insurance, don't qualify for Medicare/Medicaid, and are not in imminent danger of dying at that moment, so they are not required to even so much as offer you stabilizing treatment.

CRW's picture

Technically, a person sick with cancer would qualify for SSI or SSI disability, but there are nightmare stories now of people with cancer dying before the paperwork processes.

We need single payer Canada style single payer healthcare, allowing people to purchase supplementary policies for enhanced benefits.

James Smith's picture

Here's an article I wrote a few years ago about my personal experience with health care in Brazil. The costs have gone up mostly because the dollar has fallen so badly against the Brazilian Real.

Health Care in Brazil

The politicians are engaged in a huge debate about health care in America. They should because it is the most expensive in the world without providing the best care possible.

In Brazil we have great medical coverage. I am personally with Unimed, one of the two largest insurers in Brasil. Right now, we are paying about US $420 a month for two people in their 60’s. That rate is without belonging to any group or from an employer. For this we are totally covered for office visits, hospitalization, tests, all meds given in the hospital, and no co-payments. Everything is covered except prescription drugs. Those are so inexpensive here, it hardly matters. The co-pays alone in the USA would cover the cost of my medications here. In many cases, the government subsidizes the cost of some drugs such as those for diabetes. Citizens below a minimum income level also receive essential care at reduced prices or at no cost.

For example, for my blood pressure I take two different meds, Lisinopril 20 mg, and Amlovasc 10 mg. I also take one aspirin a day. In 2002 in the USA this was costing me, with discounts, about $105 a month. I just bought a 3-month supply here (in Dec 2011) and it came out to be about $40 USD a month. The drug store delivers, too. So we just call it in and they bring it later that day. If it's urgent, they will come right away.

Care here is of the highest quality, too. In November 2005, I had a bulging disk that was pressing on the sciatic nerve and had been causing me constant pain for several months. The treatment for this is often a “slice and dice” procedure that is risky, painful, and requires an extended recuperation period. Here, I had a neurologist that was trained in a procedure called nucleoplasty. It was invented in São Paulo and available only in Brazil and England. It involved inserting a needle into the disk and using RF (radio frequency) energy to temporarily soften the disk material. The excess material was extracted through the needle until it no longer pressed on the sciatic nerve.

I had this procedure done in the hospital at ten AM and was home in my own bed by ten PM. Not only was the recovery (if you can call it that) measured in hours, I have had no trace of pain since then. The hospital care was excellent. Care was organized for the convenience of the patient, not the staff. There were no $25 charges for an aspirin or a band aid. The food was far better than I have had in any US hospital. Only the charges were “substandard” by US experience. In any case, it was all covered by my insurance.

Dental care is inexpensive here, too. I have had two tooth implants done at about $340 USD each. Regular dental exams, restorations, and cleaning are equally inexpensive.

It seems strange to me that a country as prosperous as the USA should find it impossible to provide health care at the same level and costs as Brazil. Yes, it’s true that drug companies spend a lot on developing new drugs and need to recover those costs. But how long should they continue to recover them? For example, generic-brand drugs in the USA, even many years after being introduced upon the market, are more expensive than similar drugs in Brazil. Then there is the question of new procedures such as my nucleoplasty. Why are these things so often pioneered in other countries and only slowly introduced into the USA? Is it excessive government regulation? The constant malpractice suits? The greed of the drug companies and the medical industry? Or is it a “combination of ingredients”?

Whatever the causes, there is no doubt the USA could do far better.

If freedom means anything, it is the liberty to tell others what they do not want to hear.

CRW's picture

Besides the financial benefits, why did you move to Brazil? I assume you are retired. Just curious... My youngest is almost 3, so I am 20 years from retirement, but my wife and I would like to start planning.

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter