Politics

PG&E Rate Proposal Would Raise Rates on Low-Income Customers, Moderate Energy Users

| by

Contact: Bruce Mirken, Greenlining Institute Media Relations Coordinator, 510-926-4022; 415-846-7758 (cell)

Touted as Helping the Central Valley, Proposal Would Raise Rates for Most Valley Customers

SAN FRANCISCO – The Greenlining Institute today filed comments with the California Public Utilities Commission opposing a draft CPUC decision to allow Pacific Gas and Electric Co. to significantly change its electricity rates, shifting more of the burden onto low-income customers and those who use lower amounts of energy.

The CPUC has issued draft decisions that propose to grant three out of four of PG&E’s main residential rate proposals, each of which would raise electricity rates for low-income customers and customers with low or moderate levels of energy use.  One proposal would immediately add a $2.40 monthly customer charge to every low-income customer’s bill and a $3.00 customer charge for all other customers.  PG&E’s proposal to raise “Tier 3” rates for low-income customers would add an additional $18.00 monthly to the bills of customers in the Central Valley who use a moderate amount of energy.

Popular Video

This young teenage singer was shocked when Keith Urban invited her on stage at his concert. A few moments later, he made her wildest dreams come true.

In contrast, all of PG&E’s rate proposals would lower rates for customers who have the most extreme level of power usage.

“These proposals rob Peter to pay Paul – even though Peter has less money and is doing a better job of saving energy,” said Greenlining Institute Senior Legal Counsel Stephanie Chen. “PG&E claims that these changes would bring relief to customers in the hot Central Valley, but only a minority of Central Valley customers would see lower bills – those who use energy excessively, including those with especially large homes.  Most customers in the Central Valley and elsewhere – including all low-income customers and all moderate energy users – would see their bills rise.”

A pending state Senate bill, SB 142, would write into state law changes to utility rate policy that would have effects similar to PG&E’s proposal. The Greenlining Institute strongly opposes this legislation.

Greenlining’s full comments on the proposal are available online here.

Popular Video

This young teenage singer was shocked when Keith Urban invited her on stage at his concert. A few moments later, he made her wildest dreams come true: