Paul Krugman: Idiot or Morally Bankrupt Liar?

Share This Story

When Democrats are in power, there are no rules.  Paul Krugman, a columnist for the rapidly declining New York Times,  has recently joined the media chorus visciously castigating Senator Jim Bunning for his attempt to delay a bill until Harry Reid and the Democrat leadership agreed to follow Obama’s “PayGo” order and fund the legislation.  The Senator described the bill as non-controversial, and at a mere $10 billion—pocket change to Liberals—it could easily be funded with unspent stimulus dollars.  As Bunning put it in his own editorial, “If the Senate cannot find $10 billion to pay for a measure we all support, we will never pay for anything.”  At that rate, I guess we should just stop paying taxes altogether and fund everything with deficit spending.

Of course, to Krugman, this couldn’t be about enforcing Senate rules and revealing the “PayGo” sham.  No, Jim Bunning is amoral, and hates the unemployed.  That’s the message in his editorial.  Krugman then cites the “Bunning Blockade” as evidence that: Democrats are reasonable, moral, and care about the underdogs; Republicans have become extremist right-wingers and that is why there is no more bipartisanship in Washington; and the GOP only cares about the “affluent victims of the ‘death-tax.’”  He uses these conclusions as a justification for passing ObamaCare through reconciliation.

Earth to Krugman, I don’t know what universe you’re living in, but it’s the Democrats who don’t give a damn what the American people think.  It’s the Democrats who had a majority in the House and 60-vote super-majority in the Senate, and chose to shut Republicans out of the debate for an entire year.  It is the Democrats who refused to hear or debate Republican ideas.  It is the Democrats that ignored the polls, and only allowed the Republicans to speak when they lost “the Kennedy Seat.”  It is the Democrats that are violating their own budget rules.  And it is the Democrats, and only the Democrats, that are so power-drunk and out of touch that they are doing everything they can to circumvent the legislative process in order to seize control of the greatest Health Care system in the world with a bill that achieves none of its stated goals, and, according to the CBO, will bend the cost curve up, not down.

Krugman, the Republicans cannot effectively do anything right now.  They simply don’t have the votes.  They couldn’t even obstruct anything until Scott Brown was elected.  Krugman, like many other liberals, implies the Democrat Party alone cares about the people.  That notion doesn’t mesh with reality.  If the Democrats care about the people, why don’t they listen to them, and address their concerns?  It takes a lot of gall to not only ignore the requests of your employer, the sovereign people, but to willfully and forcefully work against them in order to score a political victory and erect a legislative monument for a narcissistic ideologue.

Senator Jim Bunning did the right thing.  It’s a shame he’s retiring.  We could use more Senators who are willing to stand up for their values and the American people by forcing Congress and our government to operate within the law.

Share This Story

`
DFX's picture

Is there a phrase more idiotic than idiot? Krugman has lost it.

Rice klowN's picture

Let's all play the "blame the other guys pols" game! WEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!! What a fun ride!!

bhall's picture

follows.

I found the Bush administration as arrogant and completely self absorbed. It was as if the people of the United States did not exist except as expendable lives to accomplish George's determination to get rid of Sadam. Instead of turning all of the efforts to hang Bin Laden. Now we are in a debilitating war that no one will win and is approaching record deaths and hundreds of billions of dollars. No one seems to have been worried about where that money was to come from.

Now we have an administration that has taken a complete reversal of action and it is not acceptable either. I will be the first to admit that Obama has not been perfect, but I do believe that his interest is in ALL the people of the United States and not just the rich.

It is said that he will be a one term president. If so that is ok, I still will have more respect in the efforts he has shown for this country that have been ignored in the immediate past.

With all this said, we are in a " house divided" and will surely fall because of a "tit for tat" bunch of babies that are holding the future in their self centered little hands.

User Removed's picture

RE: "I will be the first to admit that Obama has not been perfect, but I do believe that his interest is in ALL the people of the United States and not just the rich."

Now, my memory isn't perfect, but as I recall , Obama promised to withdraw from Iraq ASAP. On entering office, the first thing he did is authorize another troop surge .

He campaigned heavily for the first ultra rich investment banker bailout , then happily jumped on board for a second $700 billion. The second bailout was to create 4 million jobs . Approximately that many jobs have been lost since then.

Do you appreciate how much money is $700 billion?

Do the math!

It's enough money to pay over 23 million people an annual salary of $30,000!!!

Then we have what has been billed as " healthcare reform". Sounds great, huh? So what is the program? When you cut through the smoke and mirrors, the most widely accepted proposal on both sides was to throw anyone who doesn't fork over ten grand a year to an insurance company in jail for 5 years.

Yeah buddy! Obama is a real champion of the people allright!

Can you think of anything else he's done, other than drink beer and play basketball?

I can't.

User Removed's picture

Congress had a 25% approval rating when the Rs were in control and that hasn't changed since the general public uprising that put the Ds in control. Anyone who believes EITHER party gives a rip about the American people is naive beyond words to describe.

The worse the legislation, and the more appalling the practice, the more certain it is to be bipartisan. The Ds and Rs are two sides of the same coin. Favoring either is like asking for a better seat on the Titanic. For those silly enough to buy into the whole lib vs. con farce, take a few minutes to visit both party's websites. Both parties have one thing in common: neither has a platform. BOTH PARTIES STAND FOR ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!! They aren't liberal. They aren't conservative. They're corporate.

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

OV Social