Obama's Budget will Rebuild Economy on Solid Ground

Opiinion by AFL-CIO
(March 26, 2009) in Money / The Recession
A new ad (see video) backing President Obama’s budget blueprint hit the airwaves today as Senate and House budget committees unveiled their spending resolutions. Those resolutions followed much of the administration’s outline but made significant changes in some priorities.

Yet while Democratic leaders of the congressional budget panels offered alternatives to the changes they seek in the administration’s proposal, Republican lawmakers sit on the sidelines, offering no alternative, just the par-for-the-course carping criticism that has come to mark their opposition.

The new ad by Americans United for Change—a coalition of unions including the AFL-CIO, community, environmental, progressive and other groups—urges viewers to call Congress to support Obama’s budget because it:

…will rebuild our economy on a solid foundation. Jobs, health care, education, clean energy reform. On this foundation we can build real, long-term economic prosperity for all Americans.

During his nationally televised press conference last night, Obama said he wasn’t surprised Congress made changes to his original proposal.

We never expected when we printed out our budget that they would simply Xerox it and vote on it….The bottom line is that I want to see health care, energy, education and serious efforts to reduce our budget deficit.

AFL-CIO President

says Obama’s budget is a carefully crafted blueprint to address the enormous economic challenges we face and help working Americans by making serious and necessary investments in infrastructure, health care, green jobs and clean energy and education.


This morning, Peter Orszag, director of the Office of Management and Budget, said both the Senate and House budget versions follow Obama’s priorities to cut the federal deficit in half by 2013 and increase resources for clean energy, health care, education and other priorities.

While both bills establish a reserve fund for health care reform, they seek different ways to provide the $634 billion the Obama budget plan calls for as a down payment on health care reform.

In addition, the Senate plan cuts $15 billion and the House bill trims $7 billion from Obama’s request for discretionary spending on such programs as workplace safety, wage and hour protection, education, highway construction, transportation and other areas. If the funding?cuts survive in the final resolution, the specific cuts won’t be made until the appropriations process begins.

In a letter to the House Budget Committee this afternoon, AFL-CIO Government Affairs Director Bill Samuel says:

Over the last eight years, programs serving millions of working families have been the first casualties of the previous administration’s misguided budget priorities. President Obama’s budget proposal would restore critical funding for programs such as education, housing, nutrition, home energy aid, safety and health, and job training. We are concerned that any reduction in non-defense appropriations would result in continued cuts for these programs
/

Meanwhile, Republicans in both houses offered up their usual scorn and criticism, but no alternative of their own to the eight years of co-rule with the Bush administration. During those eight years,?the television ad points out, the administration “turned our economy into a house of cards,” adding:

Last fall, that house came tumbling down.

Last night, when asked about the ”just say no” stance Republicans have taken on the budget, Obama said:

Their alternative is to stand pat and to simply say, “We are just going to not invest in health care. We’re not going to take on energy. We’ll wait until the next time that gas gets to $4 a gallon. We will not improve our schools. And we’ll allow China or India or other countries to lap our young people in terms of their performance. We will settle on lower growth rates, and we will continue to contract, both as an economy and our ability to provide a better life for our kids.”

That, I don’t think, is the better option.

The congressional committees are expected to finalize their budget resolutions by the end of this week or early next week with votes by the full Senate and House before they adjourn for the Easter recess the week of?April 6. A conference to iron out?differences between the two bills will follow the recess.

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • concerned
    the math does not add up

    so how exactly do we get to a balanced budget - massive tax increases? pretend that we can just soak the rich and pretend that we don't all have to contribute ultimately? the power to confiscate income should never be taken lightly.

    i am never comfortable when one party has the power to ramrod its agenda. i didn't like it when it was the other party either. i personally am very frightened by these enormous proposals of spending increases without any realistic indication of how to pay for them except for tax increases. it seems that nothing will be will be cut to pay for them. it seems that our current administation is only interested in government raising more revenue through taxation to pay for the largest budget plan in the history of the US.

    fiscal responsibility is one thing that either the elephants or jackasses have ever paid much attention to.

    one last thought - the election was not so much the american public all of a sudden swinging liberal. it was primarily a "throw the bums out" reaction to the state of the economy . it would have gone against the dems if Kerry had been in the white house the last four years while this economic crisis unfoled. you would fooling yourself and insulting my intelligence to argue this.

    - concernedUS March 28, 2009 10:02PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • concerned
    worried

    How exactly is obama 's budget going to be paid for - massive tax increases on the "filthy" rich (i guess 250k is filthy - how dare anyone have the audacity to work hard and earn a good income, like doctors and civil rights attorneys)? it is fantasy to think that we won't all have to face higher taxes eventually.

    does anyone care about fiscal responsibility? is anything on the cuts side going to be considered. some much for a "bi- partisan approach. i am very frightened when one party has the ability to ramrod its agenda (i didn't like it when it was the rebuclican party either).

    one other thought to consider - obama's election had a lot more to do with the "throw the bums out" reaction to the sorry state of the economy than his grand social agenda. the " democratic bums" same would have suffered the same fate if kerry had been president the last 4 years.

    - concernedUS March 28, 2009 10:29PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...