Untitled-1

Obama Not Fulfilling Campaign Promises on Gun Control

Opinion by Freedom States Alliance
(May 11, 2009) in Society / Guns
CHICAGO – President Obama broke his campaign pledge to the American people last week when he refused to strip all of the dangerous Tiahrt restrictions out of his proposed budget to Congress. The Tiahrt Amendments prohibit the public release of gun crime trace data from ATF, a vital measure to help stop illegal gun trafficking into urban areas and weapons flowing into Mexico.

The President promised an era of transparency and open government, but instead caved under the gun lobby’s radical agenda and influence. The result is that more American communities will continue to suffer from the horrific toll of gun violence.

Perhaps most galling is that on President Obama’s official White House.gov web site, under his urban policy agenda, the President advocated for removing the Tiahrt restrictions. That official White House.gov web page under urban policy has now changed.



On Mr. Obama’s first full day as President, he held a press conference and gave an explicit directive about open government – an order the President has now suddenly tossed aside when it comes to gun violence.

(See text below, or watch the first minute of Obama’s press conference; also posted on YouTube:



President Obama stated:

“The way to make government responsible is to hold it accountable. And the way to make government accountable is to make it transparent so that the American people can know exactly what decisions are being made, how they’re being made, and whether their interests are being well served.

"The directives I am giving my administration today on how to interpret the Freedom of Information Act will do just that. For a long time now there has been too much secrecy in [Washington D.C.].

"The old rules said that if there was a defensible argument for not disclosing something to the American people then it should not be disclosed. That era is now over.

"Starting today, every agency and department should know that this administration’s stands on the side not on those who seek to withhold information, but those seek to make it known. …The Freedom of Information Act is perhaps the most powerful instrument we have for making our government honest and transparent”

Although President Obama’s budget lifted restrictions on police chiefs and now permits law enforcement officials to access ATF’s trace data and reports, the President went out of his way to include additional language that “no person described herein shall knowingly and publicly disclose such data.” In effect, the President’s budget prohibits this important data from being made accessible to mayors, civic leaders, researchers, gun violence prevention advocates and the American people.

Before 2004, ATF used to release its gun crime trace data to the general public. Advocates for government transparency and gun violence prevention are simply calling for a return to the practice of full public disclosure that Obama campaigned on.

The President also left intact various anti-law enforcement measures. According to ProtectPolice.org, the “Tiahrt Amendments require the Justice Department to destroy the record of a buyer whose NICS background check was approved within 24 hours. This makes it harder to catch law-breaking gun dealers who falsify their records, and it makes it more difficult to identify and track straw purchasers who buy guns on behalf of criminals who wouldn’t be able to pass a background check.”

Also, while federally licensed gun dealers must notify ATF if they discover that guns from their inventories have been lost or stolen, the Tiahrt Amendments prevent ATF from requiring gun dealers to conduct annual physical inventory checks to detect losses and thefts. An estimated 30,000 guns go “missing” from licensed gun dealers every year due do lax record keeping and enforcement.

“For President Obama who said he would go to Washington to make government transparent, this is a gross hypocrisy and a complete slap in the face to advocates, gun violence victims and survivors who are fighting hard to protect our communities from illegal gun trafficking,” said Bryan Miller, the Executive Director of Ceasefire NJ whose brother, an FBI agent, was shot and killed in the line of duty from an armed assailant. “The President said he believes in open government, but his agenda quickly craters under the gun lobby’s influence in Washington. It’s a fight the President cannot continue to run away from, nor can members of Congress.”

Sally Slovenski, Executive Director of Freedom States Alliance said of the President’s about face on releasing ATF gun crime trace data: “We are deeply frustrated by the President’s actions to withhold important information from the American people, especially those dedicated professionals working to protect our country from gun violence.

“We believed President Obama when he said that the American people can have confidence again in our government, and that no longer would special-interests prevail over the will of the American people. The President’s easy acceptance of the gun lobby’s radical agenda, and his failure to stand up for the safety of our country challenges our hope that President Obama will be the ‘change we can believe in’ with respect to reducing gun violence in our country.”

Regarding Opinion
Obama Not Fulfilling Campaign Promises on Gun Control

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • VonS
    Who's the Radical?

    Freedom States Alliance has an honorable task but the wrong approach. Nobody wants violence, but pursuing the gun and not the criminals is misdirection. Making more laws to criminalize honest citizens that own firearms is wrong. The criminal is already using a firearm in a felonious manner, and I doubt would be mindful of any new gun laws . Freedom States Alliance labels any person/group against their views a "radical gun lobby agenda". I suppose that would have to include our forefathers who wrote the Constitution of the United States, the Supreme Court that recently upheld the 2nd Amendment, and the California Appellate Court that did the same in liberal San Francisco. They all know that the honest citizen has, not just the right, but the responsibility to protect themselves and their family. The adage is true, "take away guns and only criminals will have them". Gun lobbys protect our constitutional rights from radical misdirected organizations like Freedom States Alliance, and keep the focus on the crime and the criminal.

    - VonSUS May 11, 2009 3:48PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Cathie
    Reply to "Who's the Radical?"

    Vons-

    Did you even bother to read this article before you posted? Please point to the section that supposedly talks about "more laws to criminalize honest citizens."

    This is all about making crime gun trace data available to policy makers, advocates and researchers. Don't you find it at all curious how hard the NRA fights to keep this information secret? What are they trying to hide?

    I would recommend that you read the entire District of Columbia v. Heller Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled that while there is an individual right to own a gun "like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose."

    The decision went on to give numerous examples of constitutional gun regulations - including licensing and registration. The Court make is absolutely clear that the right to own a gun exists side by side with the right to regulate the purchase, possession and carrying of guns .

    Nobody is trying to ban all guns and this constant drum beating to the contrary makes it impossible to have a rational, intelligent discussion on how best to keep dangerous guns out of the hands of dangerous people.

    - CathieUS May 12, 2009 12:18PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • jfh
      this complaint is propaganda, pure and simple

      For twenty years, and more, the public has listened to (and been confused by) the claims of gun grabbers such as Freedom States Alliance.

      Buried in the text of this silly complaint is the fact that the Tihart amendment prevents direct dissemination to "advocates" It does NOT prevent sharing among 'experts' and Law Enforcement.

      Give the Abominator enough time; he and Rahm are trying to figure out a way to satisfy the bleaters.

      - jfhUS May 13, 2009 5:00PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...