Quantcast
Guns

Obama Bans More than 100,000 American-Made Rifles

By David Kopel

According to The Korea Times, the Obama administration has blocked efforts by the South Korean government to sell over a  hundred thousand surplus M1 Garand and Carbine rifles into the United States market. These self-loading were rifles introduced in 1926 and 1941.

As rifles, they are especially well-suited to community defense in an emergency, as in the cases of community defense following Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and Hurricane Andrew in 1992. Along with AR-15 type rifles, the M1 rifles are the quintessential firearms of responsible citizenship, precisely the type of firearms which civic responsibility organizations such as the Appleseed Project teach people how to use.  

According to a South Korean official, “The U.S. insisted that imports of the aging rifles could cause problems such as firearm accidents. It was also worried the weapons could be smuggled to terrorists, gangs or other people with bad intentions.”

Regarding the second objection, any firearm lawfully imported into the United States would eventually be sold by a Federal Firearm Licensee who, pursuant to the background check system imposed by Congress (and endorsed by the NRA) would have to contact federal or state law enforcement to verify that the gun buyer is not prohibited from possessing firearms.

Accordingly, the risk that the South Korean surplus guns might fall into the hands of gangsters or other bad people is exactly the same as with the sale of any other retail firearm in the United States. Notably, neither the M1 Garand nor the M1 carbine are concealable, and the M1 Garand is long, heavy, and bulky. Accordingly, the criminal utility of such guns is relatively low.

The second Obama administration objection is accidents. But in fact, increasing gun density in the United States has been associated with steeply declining rates of gun accidents. In 1948 there were .36 guns per person. (That is, about one gun for every three Americans.) By 2004, there was nearly one gun for every American. In 1948, there were 1.6 fatal gun accidents per 100,000 persons. By 2004, the rate had fallen by 86%, so that there were .22 fatal accidents per 100,000 persons. (For underlying data, see Appendix B of my amicus brief in Heller.)

Legally, it is indisputable that the guns are importable. Being over 50 years old, the rifles are automatically “Curios and Relics” according to federal law. 27 CFR section 478.11. Accordingly, they are by statutory definition importable. 18 USC section 925 (e)(1). Notwithstanding the law, the Obama administration has the ability to pressure the South Korean government to block the sale of the guns.

President Obama was elected on the promise that he supported individual Second Amendment rights. His administration’s thwarting of the import of these American-made rifles is not consistent with that promise.

Get More:
 

Comments

User Removed's picture

Causation

RE: "While correlation does not automatically prove causation, when you find evidence of correlation at every turn and control carefully for other variables then is does in fact indicate a cause has been found."

While I don't put much stock in the numbers bandied about on either side of the argument - it's not a numbers issue - the one you cite is actually the only one that really matters. It's the one our Country's founders relied on in insisting we have a Second Amendment in the first place. Gun bans are nothing new and there was plenty of history for the Second's authors to consider and review. Their conclusion was the same as your's. When guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Or, as Mark Twain said, "All kings is mostly rapscallions."

That aside, it's still especially annoying BO would go out of his way to keep this piece of American history out of the hands of Americans. The big eared, buck toothed dweeb just seems to be annoying everyone these days.

BM59Fan's picture

Safety of the bearer Not the Breaker

Unless your primary concern is for the ones whom the firearms would be used against, that the safety of the ones whom deadly force would be used against is important in your mind somehow, I guess that it is an inconvenient fact that the safety of those whom bear the firearms for their own defense and the defense of their loved ones and property is increased. As to accidents - they happen, but are minuscule in comparison to the actual use to defend ones life, family and property. The others where use against is a legitimate defense? I COULD NOT CARE LESS!

Perhaps you would look better bald?

Royal Scots Highlander's picture

Start tearing that hair out!!!

In upwards of 2.5 MILLION times each year, a VIOLENT CRIME is either stopped from happening, or is arrested in progress by a privately owned firearm.

And just think: In an extremely small number of those instances is the firearms ever discharged.

But when it is? In a fewer number of times yet, does that discharge result in a wounding, or a fatality.

You might want to RECONSIDER your proclamation about your hair ...

Close x
Don't Miss Out! |
Like us on Facebook?