Muslims Strike Back With "Everybody Draw Holocaust Day"

by Rich Trzupek on Sep 15th, 2010

At the other end of the spectrum, we have one major religion in the world so terribly insecure about itself that it cannot bear the slightest provocation, no matter how obscure or tenuous the source is. Rather than holding that religion – Islam – accountable for maintaining a skin so thin that it encroaches upon the freedoms it supposedly hold so dear, the Left continues to enable a hyper-sensitive Muslim worldview. According to the Left, Muslims are a particularly aggrieved part of the victim class and thus the regular rules of public discourse do not apply when they express their grievances. History tells us that leftists aren’t doing anyone any good, not Muslims and certainly not the civilized world, by according Islam this special status.
The firestorm of controversy that surrounded the ultimately unrealized plans of an obscure Florida pastor to burn a few copies of the Qur’an was truly remarkable, without any analog in the modern world. If Terry Jones had announced an intention to put any other book in the world to the torch, no one would have taken any notice, much less threatened to set off a firestorm of righteous indignation. The fact that this one book, and only this book, could provoke such a ludicrously disproportionate reaction ought to tell us much more about the people who believe in that book than it does about the people who question its authenticity and authority. Bible burnings, for example, are not uncommon. Last year an equally obscure preacher in North Carolina announced his intention to burn copies of the Christian Holy Book on Halloween. The United States has officially confiscated and burned Bibles in Afghanistan. Such incidents didn’t result in Christians storming the streets, howling in outrage or threatening violence. Such plans were instead met with a shrug, because the faithful were confident enough to say that such misguided actions ultimately don’t matter.
Yet, the very idea that one man could possibly desecrate the Qur’an was enough to get the State Department, the commanding General in Afghanistan and the President of the United States involved. The mainstream media jumped on the bandwagon as well, warning the populace of all the terrible things that were sure to happen if Jones went through with his plans. The irony is that Islamic inspired violence is a given, whether a preacher with bad facial hair actually burns copies of the Qur’an or not. No matter, for in the mainstream media’s eyes the damage has already been done. Islamic violence is always our fault according to the Left and this latest non-incident has become further proof that it is right. Islam doesn’t need reform, the Left assures us, our attitude towards the religion is the real problem.
As an example, consider the ongoing sectarian clash in the Kashmir region of India. Hindus and Muslims have been escalating levels of violence in the disputed Himalayan region for three months now, with Muslims pushing for autonomy and Hindus looking to protect Indian sovereignty. Yet, according to a story published in the New York Times on Monday, Terry Jones is ultimately to blame for exasperating the bloodshed. “[S]tate authorities sought to differentiate the new violence as separate from the other protests, linking it to the reports of the desecrated Koran. Indian authorities had fretted over the planned Sept. 11 burning of a Koran by a Florida pastor, Terry Jones,” the Times’ Jim Yardley wrote.
The Qur’an burning didn’t happen. Not that it should matter. Members of any other religion in the world would dismiss plans to burn their holy book as the unimportant, deluded ravings of an obscure individual who represents nothing more than himself. Muslims and their leftist allies, on the other hand, have managed to elevate Terry Jones into something he never was and never should have been: a global figure who wields immense power. The fact that something like this could occur is not a tribute to Jones’ message and charisma, it’s rather proof of just how powerfully Islamic insecurities influence the West, and particularly the Left.
Of the thirty recognized on-going global conflicts raging today, twenty-eight of them involve Islam in some shape or form. That was the case before Terry Jones got his fifteen minutes of fame and will continue to be so long after Jones disappears into the footnotes of history. Islam continues to be its own worst enemy and the Left, particularly the mainstream media, can’t seem to stop enabling this most insecure of the world’s religions.

Wasn't there just an article called "Muslims Behaving Badly"?
Oh Wait. Maybe it was called " Islam Expert Not Shocked by Disappearance of 'Draw Muhammad' Cartoonist"?
No Wait, It could have been" Christians Warn Against Double Standard in Wake of Quran Burning Row"?
Or Maybe its "Koran Burning: How Dare the Muslim World Lecture America on Religious Tolerance"?
How 'bout "Muslims Resume Building on Christian Graveyard in Pakistan"?
How 'bout this "NYC Mosque Rhetoric May Harm Persecuted Christians"?
Can it be "Controversial Jesus TV Show Canceled in Lebanon"?
I getting close "Pakistani Court Acquits Christian Woman of 'Blasphemy"?
Closer "Prospects of Religious Freedom Appear Grim in Islamic Maldives"?
Closer "Poll: 3 in 5 New Yorkers Oppose Ground Zero Mosque"?
Closest "Muslim Protesters Surround Worshippers in Indonesia"?
Gee, for so many radicals, they sure get around, don't they?

A Freudian slip perhaps?

As Muhammad said, “war is deceit,” and us ill-informed, timorous, naïve, and easily fooled “unbelievers” have had sand thrown in our eyes, our hopes and fears are being played on like a cheap Chinese violin and, buffeted, blinded and disoriented, we are constantly being turned around, mislead and deceived by Muslims, by Islam and by their agents and allies and partisans in the West; we are being very carefully led down the path to our own destruction.
As has already been said, while there may be “moderate Muslims” there is no “moderate Islam,” and the fact of the matter is that, as the writer says, a la Mao and his “Peoples War,” the sea of “moderate Muslims” is where the Jihadis swim, and get their oxygen, their food , and their concealing cover. If it were not for the absolutely essential cover and support they receive from “moderate Muslims,” the Jihadis would not be able to operate with anywhere near the freedom that they currently have; Muslim solidarity against us hated “unbelievers,” and the law of Muslim “Omerta” have served the Jihadis extremely well.
The Jihadis are not “Islamists” or “radicals,” or “fundamentalist” Muslims, nor are they a “fringe group” but rather, they are very much mainstream Muslims for, from what they say, from the passages of the Qur’an, from the sayings and incidents in Muhammad’s career, from the precedents from Muslim history they cite as justifications for their actions, they are grounded in, embody, and are acting out the fundamental viewpoint, tenets and goal of the conversion, enslavement, or killing of all unbelievers and of the world’s conquest by Islam that is the central thrust of the Qur’an, of Muhammad’s life, and of Islam itself.
In my view, the billion or so “moderate Muslims” are ominously silent spectators, gathered on the sidelines of the current battlefield where their more activist coreligionists, the Jihadis, attack and fight and kill us unclean, hated “unbelievers” (including those Muslims who the Jihadis find insufficiently orthodox in viewpoint, or those Muslims who unfortunately happen to be “collateral damage” when the Jihadis are just trying to “get ‘er done”). I view the silence of these “moderate Muslims” and their inaction—no statements or demonstrations of any kind or size against Jihad and Muslim violence and terror, no proposed major excision of the violent parts from the Qur’an, or popular centers, leaders, or movements pushing this idea–as acquiescence, not disapproval, for, after all, the Qur’an tells them that any spoils wrested from the unbelievers will be their legitimate war booty. They are not our saviors; they are Islam’s reserve battalions, which will come in on the side of the Jihadis for the final kill.
The writer is correct in his diagnosis and correct in the treatment he recommends, although he sees way too many shades of gray here. Islam is not a religion but a violent, supremacist, totalitarian military and political ideology cloaked in the thinnest of religious disguise, an ideology that has been very carefully created to be impervious to reform, and any real and thorough reform would take the heart out of Islam and destroy it. While “containment” of Islam might be possible, compromise with Islam is not; Islam is not built for compromise.
There really are only one of two possible outcomes here, either the “unbeliever” democracies of the West recover their “civilizational confidence,” and their clear moral vision, we decide that us unbelievers and our civilization and ideals are, indeed, worth defending and fighting for, and after a very long or a very short and incredibly bloody struggle involving nuclear weapons, Islam is decisively defeated, or Islam wins its war of deceit, subversion and violence, the West and all its nations and peoples are conquered and enslaved, and we enter a new Dark Ages.
So far, given the “evidence on the ground,” the possibility of a new Dark Age seems much more likely.

Islam is a vile, ungodly religion that sexually mutilates infant females and treats its women as chattel. It is a violent religion even within its own religious sects. (Sunnis, etc.) They have consistently in the past and are even now in the process of persecuting and killing Christians and people from other religions outside of their own narrow beliefs. This killing and fighting has been going on since the beginning of Islam. Regretfully it's not the exception but the rule in the lives of those who are truly committed to Islam. To think you're going to stop this tradition of persecution, mutilating and killing by 'talking nice to them' is a fools dream.

The famous author Joel Richardson released a book on the devastating account of the possible connection between the Biblical Antichrist and the Islamic Mahdi. His book " Antichrist: Islam's Awaited Messiah" shows how the Bible predicts that in the last days a charismatic leader will establish a global following in the name of peace. The Quran also predicts that a man will rise up to lead the nations, pledging to usher in an era of peace. The man in the Quran is called the Mahdi, or Islam's savior. However, the man in the Bible is the Antichrist. Could it be possible that they are one and the same person? Richardson's stunning research and analysis suggest that it is.

Now this is an idea who's time has come. Will the same Islamic media that doesn't censor pro-Nazi material allow this??

Who understands FREE SPEECH? American's do... I DO... I say what ever the FUCK; I want and My Government and my President Obama can suck his Own Dick! Some American's may not like Me saying that, but I can; at will. They can't do anything, about it either! That's free speech coming from an AMERICAN!

The First Amendment guarantees me that RIGHT! That's why I'll kill and die for my country... and not a Deity or Person.