- Home
- Politics
- Entertainment
- Sports
- Health
- Religion
- Society
- Tech
- Money
- People
- Science
- Galleries
Entertainment
Photos: Inside Octomom Nadya Suleman's Porn Shoot
Last week we reported that the infamous Octomom was rethinking her position on appearing in hardcore pornography to support her gazillion children. This week a few images surfaced on TMZ that make it clear just how serious she was about that reconsideration.
Bankrupt and struggling to care for her 14 young children, Nadya Suleman, 36, apparently accepted a longstanding offer to appear in a few adult film scenes. It is not known how much she was paid for her participation, but suffice to say it was likely a sum significantly higher than the $10,000 she got for her topless photo shoot (though nowhere near the $1 million offered her in 2009).
According to TMZ, Suleman agreed to do a solo masturbation scene in the film though it is currently unknown whether she will be filmed having sex with other actors.
See photos from the NC-17 shoot below.
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter
Comments
Not that I necessarily
Not that I necessarily condone this, but at least she's making some of her own money so that it might ease up taxpayers paying for her stupidy on having all these kids with no income.
Why do welfare recipients so
Why do welfare recipients so irritate some while Wall St speculatirs who keep the profits of risky schemes using our money, but who regulary pass their inevitable losses off on others as well? A welfare recipient spends that money in days driving whole economies that would suffer without the economic stimulus that this regular infusion of cash keeps going, wheras these weakthy slpbs already have all the toys they want and so save (eg remove) money they make from circulation....with the pile of money large corps are now sitting on being the principle reason there;s not enough consumer activity to re-ignite a growth economy.... Yet the Octobraod reaps righteous anger for having a large family...like my grandparents, your grandparents, and many families did "back in the good ol days" conservatives keep pining for! Wots up wit dat?
LOL - drug dealers in the
LOL - drug dealers in the hood are the only people who are likely to keep enormous amounts of cash in a private safe and thus truly out of circulation.
Bank savings accounts are merely supposed to be lent out by banks on very low risk loans.
Of course recently with too much government protect of banks from failing -- the banks had developed a real "what the hell" attitude. "If our big gamble doesn't pay off the government will cover us."
Talk about unfounded
Talk about unfounded assumptions!!!
All those high risk Wall Street guys spend all their dough buying drugs in the hood. The really wealthy guys live in the hood...till they die in a hail of bullets.
Care to exchange some more bad poop?
The rich take their money out circulation? I doubt any significant number of rich people keep their money under the mattress or as bullion in private vaults -- Addams Family movies are not an authoritative source.
In fact anyone who saves in a bank, rich or poor, has still has their money invested by the bank -- at equal risk regardless of total wealth. At least if the rich wisely split their money between FDIC accounts. There might be a handful of banks in the world that at simple vault companies with no investments of customer money. They are not big or important banks and they sure don't pay interest or give free or even cheap accounts.
The truth is that the rich get rich by making higher risk investments, they have some spare money ...which is why the ultra rich don't always stay ultra rich. Occasionally they invest too much in one or two bad deals.
Kinda like when somebody says
Kinda like when somebody says smell this and you know its going to be bad but you smell it anyway. She makes my skin crawl but I'll gut through it.