Modern Women and the New Definition of Marriage

Share This Story

Marriage seems to be a hot topic these days — perhaps because of all the politicians who can’t keep their penises in their pants.

Or maybe that’s just a coincidence. Regardless, there’s a new book out called Marry Him: The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough, by Lori Gottlieb. The gist of the book is that women need to be smarter about picking a husband. Rather than reject guys for no real reason, or thinking passion is enough of reason to go out with someone, women should consider what qualities are most important in a husband. In other words: Lower your expectations, gals.

There was also an article in Tuesday’s Wall Street Journal about the secrets of happy couples who’ve been married 40-plus years. Then today there was an op-ed piece in Wall Street Journal titled, “Did I Get Married Too Young?” All this discussion of marriage reminds me of something Julie Christie’s character says in the movie “Away From Her.” She’s riding in the car with her husband of 44 years on the way to an assisted living place for people with Alzheimer’s and thinking about their life together. In recalling a string of affairs her husband had decades earlier when he was a professor — a lapse he apparently made amends for in the ensuing decades — she says,

“I think people are too demanding. They want to be in love every single day. What a liability.”

A liability indeed, one that has a lot to do with why marriage has become such a problem for the younger generation. Modern women want too much — and expect too much — from marriage.

What women need to do is listen to their grandmothers. One wife from the article about people who’ve been married for eons gave this advice: “You have to love your spouse more than life itself.” Another husband said he quit the Air Force early in their marriage because it bothered his wife to have him gone so much. And yet another husband — Ozzy Osborne of all people — said, “You don’t throw in the towel at the first sign of trouble.”

All good advice; but, sadly, this is not the attitude taken by today’s young couples — women in particular. Modern women have been taught to put themselves first; they rarely advocate making major life decisions for the sake of their partner; and they often throw in the towel at the first sign of trouble. Indeed, most divorces today are initiated by women — a stark contrast to several generations ago.

So what’s the answer? In “Did I Get Married Too Young?” David Lapp, 22 and newly married, suggests an entirely new way of viewing matrimony. Rather than considering marriage “the end of adventure and beginning of monotony” — as my generation has (I’m 41) — what if we begin to view it as,

“learning to live with and love another person? We may be startled to find that the greatest adventure lies not in knowing oneself as much as in knowing and committing to another person.”

What a concept. And it only took a 22 year-old to point it out.

Share This Story

`
quantummechanik's picture

What Ms. Venkner seems to be saying, and correct me if I'm wrong , is that we have far too many expectations on marriage . Citing the Julie Christie movie, she applauds that character for putting up with her husbands multiple affairs. So, I guess we're to assume that, according to Ms. Venkner's beliefs, infidelity is not only a poor reason to end a marriage, but fidelity is too high an expectation.

It's looking like it's going to be a trade-off. Either we expect our spouses to be faithful and divorce them when they aren't--which is what Ms. Venkner seems to dislike--or we significantly lower our expectations in marriage, which, to me, feels more than anything like a devaluation of marriage. Which is what so many on the right are trying to avoid. So...I'm confused. again. Nuts.

ecuadmail's picture

the circumstances of the infidelity played a bit into that decision. You can't know if someone is going to make up for their mistakes although the repentant ones always say they will. I understood this article as people, in this case women are cited, expect to be the worshiped one in a relationship and have it work out for them. Its what my dad (himself a divorced and remarried man) refers to as the "I" factor. "I deserve more attention, I deserve to do what I like, I get to make the decisions" etc etc. And to be fair to my mother I'm sure he had something to do with the divorce also. In any case marriage means turning the "I" into we. Something against what the pop culture of empowered people is intrinsically against. At least that's the message I get.

I'd also like to comment on the end of the article. People who consider marriage “the end of adventure and beginning of monotony” have infected the rising generation of young ladies. I've spoken about marriage with the girls I've dated and all say they want to travel first, or they want a career first, or this or they don't want to be tied down etc etc. Basically all the arguments men are accused of making. I'll give both parties the guilt but the idea that THAT mindset is present is clearly demonstrated. Marriage is and should be considered the start of a REAL adventure. A very very very very difficult and rewarding one. And if people aren't ready for it then don't do it. But don't pass it up just because you think its the end of your "real" life.

Stella's picture

Well said.

Keep up the good work .

User Removed's picture

What's the marriage / divorce situation in the US? Down right grim:

http://www.usattorneylegalservices.com/divorce-statistics.html

According to the above, the median length of a marriage is 7 years. 12% fail in less than 2 years. 43% fail within 15 years. 65% of second marriages fail.

Many years ago a famous couple was asked the secret to their happy marriage. They answered, "We're always polite to each other." At the time it struck me as one of the most simple and obvious truths I've ever seen. They obviously didn't "settle for less". What they had was the ability to recognize when they had it all.

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

OV Social

 

randomness