Mexico Legalizes Drugs, But Only U.S. Can Stop Drug Violence
by Ben Morris
Last week, Mexico passed a new law decriminalizing simple possession of marijuana and other drugs. Perhaps our neighbor to the south will now consider the possibility of full legalization (regulating marijuana like alcohol, as opposed to simply removing penalties for possession). A number of people in Mexico are calling for a debate, with former President Vicente Fox as one of the most prominent voices in that chorus. However, others are wondering if legalization in Mexico would make a difference. The answer, as I see it, is unfortunately no.
The World Health Organization’s 2008 report on drug use found that more Americans use marijuana than people in any of the other 16 countries studied (which included Mexico). The report, along with many other sources, concludes that America is the largest illicit drug market in the world. The cartels in Mexico cater almost exclusively to customers in the U.S., pulling in huge profits every year (70% of which are from marijuana sales). If Mexico were to legalize marijuana, the cartels’ business would continue as usual. They would still smuggle marijuana into the U.S. and continue to profit from doing so.
No, the answer to the cartel problem does not lie in Mexico; it lies here in the U.S.
The U.S. alone has the power to wipe out the cartels, and it can do so with a simple change in policy. Were we to abolish marijuana prohibition and replace it with a system of taxation and regulation based on alcohol laws, a new, legal marijuana industry would put the criminal competition out of business overnight. We did it once before. In the 1930s, following our failed experiment with alcohol prohibition, the fledgling alcohol industry took over, producing a safer product and putting money into the economy rather than taking it out. And it happened without the moral degradation prohibitionists predicted.
This is precisely why the Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy released a report in January calling on the U.S. to change its marijuana laws. Drug producing countries in Latin America have first-hand experience with the devastating effects of America’s war on drugs. The violence and organized crime feeding the U.S. market have been rooted there for decades, with disastrous results. The U.S., on the other hand, has never faced these realities on its own soil – not to the same scale and severity as our neighbors in Mexico or those who lived through the reign of Pablo Escobar in Columbia.
But that is beginning to change. Violence in Mexico is spilling over into Texas, Arizona, and southern California. The cartels now operate in 230 American cities – think about what that means. 230 means more than New York, Los Angeles, and other large metropolitan areas, it means Bismark, N.D., Wichita, Kan., and even Kalamazoo, Mich., small towns where Americans are feeling the impact of bad drug policy. More directly, it means that the U.S. government can no longer ignore the failures of its war on marijuana.
The sensible solution is right in front of us. We just need the political will to see it through.
If you’d like to help make a change, write your member of Congress and ask him or her to support marijuana policy reform. More information on how to do so can be found at mpp.org/federal-action.
Read more on OpposingViews.com: Mexico Legalizes Drugs? Not Really













Mexico Legalizes Drugs, But Only U.S. Can Stop Drug Violence
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Great article!
The best way to fight prohibition and end deal a crushing blow to the mexican cartels is to get one state to vote on it, pass it and watch the dominos fall. This is our opportunity to put our money where our mouth is. Join us in California by donating or volunteering for the California Cannabis Initiative who is working hard at bringing us the Tax, Regulate, and Control Cannabis Act of 2010 to the ballot box. Lets end this senseless war that has drained our local, state and federal treasuries and has destroyed more families and lives than any drug itself could have ever done. To join or help the fight go to www.californiacannabisinitiative.org
Oscar Chavez
California Cannabis Initiative
San Bernardino County Coordinator
- OscarC
August 24, 2009 6:17PM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Naive
It’s naïve to think that legalizing marijuana in the United States would have a significant effect on the violence in Mexico as this would only remove one legal barrier from the Cartels, but do nothing to shut them down.
Who do you think is going to be supplying all that newly legal pot? The Cartels currently charge farmers a “protection tax” to sell their crops in the open market ( http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f =/c/a/2009/08/22/MN1U199EJD.DTL) so what exactly makes you think they would allow anyone else to grow and sell marijuana?
A decent part of the current violence comes from the Cartels warring against each other for trade routes into the US ( http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-03-08-mex-cartels_N.htm ). How on earth would making the trade easier help this?
The article mentioned the end of prohibition, and it’s interesting to note that this did not coincide with an end to bootlegging ( http://www.lubbockonline.com/stories/091208/liv_331328091.shtml ). Since taxes and regulations were imposed on the manufacture and sale of alcohol , bootlegging became a lucrative business. Tobacco is another modern example of how a legal product becomes a viable commodity for smuggling when taxes are imposed ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A23384-2004Jun7?language=printer ).
Legalizing marijuana is not going to bring about a ceasefire.
- thebigmike
August 25, 2009 3:42PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Naive? Not really.
You forget, by legalizing the production and the sales of Cannabis you cut out the cartels by allowing farmers in the state to grow cannabis and disrtibute it without any "risk" factor; therefore bringing down the value. By taxing it at a low rate you can still beat out the cartels pricing which includes a "risk" factor fee. By taking away this major revenue from the cartels you weaken their ability to pay for briberies, weapons, and their "employees". I do understand this will not bring about a ceasefire immediatley but it will put a stranglehold on the cartels, allowing law enforcement from both sides of the borders to better combat the cartels.
You do make a good point as far as alcohol and tobacco smuggling and bootlegging goes but this will be a smaller problem to deal with. How often have you encountered blackmarket booze or tobacco? When prohibition came to an end in the 30's much of the violence associated with the underground distribution was slowley cut down because it was no longer a money maker rather it cost them more. That is why it is impairative to not impose a high tax on it at first, this way the cartels can no longer compete. The US has to learn from alcohol prohibition and the repeal of alcohol prohibition so as to not commit the same mistakes with Cannabis re-legalization.
- OscarC
August 25, 2009 4:54PM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Also
Since OscarC gave a fair enough response to the bootlegging issue, please allow me to address your other concern.
"Who do you think is going to be supplying all that newly legal pot?"
It won't be the Mexicans. The U.S. is quite capable, and very good at actually, growing pot. As a connoisseur I can say without hesitation that Mexican marijuana is horrible, brown, pressed garbage that only exists in this country because of prohibition. With a few exceptions from Canada (BC especially), the U.S. can grow fantastic herb coast to coast. And we will, and grow it legally, and pay taxes on it, and it will be a huge corporate venture.
Plus I will have a giant glee attack everytime I buy a pack of Kentucky Blues, with the made in the U.S.A. flag on the side, right next to the warning label. And to think that all those profits will be staying here in the U.S., benefitting this country and not the criminal element in another nation.
- tek August 26, 2009 3:52AM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
legalization might help
If Mexico were to legalize,and then tax the export of drugs grown there,it might solve a lot of their violence,if the cartels cooperated and paid the taxes it would stop the all out assault on the cartels by the army. And the Mexican government would get what they are really fighting the cartels for,some of the money .
- Clay
August 24, 2009 6:28PM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Peace on the home front
Debaters debate the two wars as if Nixon’s civil war on Woodstock Nation didn’t yet run amok. One needn’t travel to China to find indigenous cultures lacking human rights or to Cuba for political prisoners. America leads the world in percentile behind bars, thanks to ongoing persecution of hippies, radicals, and non-whites under banner of the war on drugs . If we’re all about spreading liberty abroad, then why mix the message at home? Peace on the home front would enhance credibility.
The drug czar ’s Rx for prison fodder costs dearly, as lives are flushed down expensive tubes. My shaman’s second opinion is that psychoactive plants are God’s gift. In God’s eyes, it’s all good (Gen.1:12). The administration claims it wants to reduce demand for cartel product, but extraditing Canadian seed vendor Marc Emery increases demand. Mr. Emery enables American farmers to steal cartel customers with superior domestic product.
The constitutionality of the CSA (Controlled Substances Act of 1970) derives from an interstate commerce clause. This clause is invoked to finance organized crime , endanger homeland security , and throw good money after bad. Official policy is to eradicate, not tax, the number-one cash crop in the land. America rejected prohibition, but it’s back. Apparently, SWAT teams don’t need no stinking amendment.
Nixon promised the Schafer Commission would support the criminalization of his enemies, but it didn’t. No matter, the witch-hunt was on. No amendments can assure due process under an anti- science law without due process itself. Psychology hailed the breakthrough potential of LSD, until the CSA halted all research. Marijuana has no medical use, period.
The RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993) allows Native American Church members to eat peyote, which functions like LSD. Americans shouldn’t need a specific church membership to obtain their birthright freedom of religion . Denial of entheogen sacrament to any American, for mediation of communion with his or her maker, precludes the free exercise of religious liberty.
Freedom of speech presupposes freedom of thought. The Constitution doesn’t enumerate any governmental power to embargo diverse states of mind. How and when did government usurp this power to coerce conformity? The Mayflower sailed to escape coerced conformity. Legislators who would limit cognitive liberty lack jurisdiction.
Common-law must hold that adults own their bodies. The Founding Fathers decreed that the right to the pursuit of happiness is inalienable. Socrates said to know your self. Lawmakers should not presume to thwart the intelligent design that molecular keys unlock spiritual doors. Persons who appreciate their own free choice of path in life should tolerate seekers’ self-exploration.
Simple majorities in each house could put repeal of the CSA on the president’s desk. The books have ample law on them without the CSA. The usual caveats remain in effect. You are liable for damages when you screw up. Strong medicine requires prescription. Employees can be fired for poor job performance. No harm, no foul; and no excuse, either. Replace the war on drugs with a frugal, constitutional, science-based drugs policy.
- Antinomian
August 24, 2009 7:31PM
Reply to this Recommend
(1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
misleading title
Mexico has not legalized drugs ; it has decriminalized possession to free up prison space and money to go after suppliers. Marijuana possession for personal use is also decriminalized in CA and several other states. But marijuana remains illegal. This strategy holds suppliers at fault, but is a contradiction. It won't decrease and may increase use, unless fines and treatment are used to decrease use, so suppliers will still have enough incentive to sell.
You can see the effect with illegal immigration . Employers are legally not allowed to hire undocumented labor , but this law is rarely enforced, so the suppliers (the laborers) continue to cross the border because of the demand.
Carrying the analogy further, people complain that we can't control our borders, just as people complain that we can't win the " war on drugs ." The demand will fuel the supply, and no enforcement on the demand will not solve the problem with the supply even if criminal sanctions are imposed on it.
We could legalize drugs, and we could open our borders. Everything would be out in the open and we could regulate drugs and immigrants.
But we have to be prepared for the consequences of such actions which would mean more drug using/more immigrants and how this would affect our society .
This can be applied to any situation which is hard to control and goes underground like prostitution , polygamy, etc.
People who like this solution often try to paint the practice in positive terms. Drug use--what's wrong with that? Undocumented workers --help the economy. But you have to look at the down side and how these affect other social problems.
The problems are difficult to deal with, but legalization/open borders are not the only solutions and may be worse than the status quo.
- Lynn9
August 26, 2009 9:24AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
"End Prohibition Now!"
Paramilitary drug raids increase the chances for violence to occur in America's homes and streets. "Drug prohibition causes more pain, suffering and death than the drugs themselves." Cries Howard Wooldridge of LEAP, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. Watch the LEAP video , "End Prohibition Now!"
http://www.leap.cc/cms/index.php?name=Content&pid=28
Many supporters of a change to science -based policy do not use so called illicit drugs or plan to but are just compassionate liberty lovers! We believe less people will be lost to violence, suicide , overdose and skid row or will stoop to prostitution with policy that offers help and treatment to addicts in place of incarceration.
Weed out morally bankrupt servants of tyranny, gun control fanatics and racists by taking away the main tool they use to extend their agenda, the new prohibition. Help construct better, safer drug policies for society and the individual. The violence, official lawlessness and prison over population are a policy created nightmare.
- Colleen McCool
August 27, 2009 8:47AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.