Marijuana

Life in Prison for Growing Marijuana?

Opinion by NORML
(November 15, 2009) in Society / Drug Law

At a time of heightened national security post-911, a near-depression economy and state government budgets bleeding red coast to coast, what is the moral and economic imperative that compels some in law enforcement to seek lifetime sentences for small-time cannabis growers?


Again, cannabis consumers and activists should never shrink back from prohibitionist (and some in the media) arguments that “no one gets arrested for cannabis in the US (it’s practically legal!)” when over 755,000 cannabis consumers are busted annually for simple possession (94,000 others were charged with cultivation, distribution or conspiracy therein).


Even more so when there are outrageous claims made that ‘no goes to jail or prison for pot’.


Unfortunately for a Jackson Mississippi man named Ronald Sekul, he can attest to how wrong these false claims are as he stares down a lifetime sentence for cultivating 51 cannabis plants.



Man could get life in pot bust, Jackson resident was growing 51 plants, officials say

A 33-year-old Jackson man accused of growing marijuana in his apartment could get up to life in prison if convicted.


In the case of Ronald Christopher Sekul, the Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics intends to ask prosecutors to apply a law called the “kingpin” statute, MBN Director Marshall Fisher said.


The statute can be applied to Sekul’s case because he allegedly had a drug operation for longer than 12 consecutive months and had more than 10 pounds of marijuana, Fisher said.


Sekul was arrested Wednesday for allegedly growing 4-foot marijuana plants in the back bedroom of the fourplex he lives in at 1510 Myrtle St., according to MBN.


He is out of jail on $50,000 bond.


Read the entire article here.


Think about, life in prison for cultivating one of the most popular agricultural products in America–arguably the number one commercially cultivated commodity in the country. Think about the annual expense incurred by the taxpayers of Mississippi for the incarceration of Mr. Sekul: $22,000-30,000 a year; think about the total cost to the taxpayers if Mr. Sekul spends 10 years in prison (approx. $275,000), 20 years (approx. $600,000) or 30 years (approx. $1 million).


Rather than tax and actually control cannabis like more dangerous and addictive government-sanctioned drugs like tobacco and alcohol products, is it not remarkable beyond words that the state and federal governments still engages both massive number of annual cannabis-related arrests and the incarceration annually nationwide of an estimated 45,000-65,000 cannabis-only offenders, while still not achieving any of the stated goals of prohibition (view a comprehensive NORML report analyzing cannabis arrests in the US here, read page 45 to see where none of the government’s stated goals are achieved).


Feds Are The Ones Still Stirring Pot With Taxpayers’ Money


However, there is a potential policy silver-lining to buttress the expense to the taxpayers and tragedy of what our society is trying to do Mr. Sekul and that is that President Obama’s new drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske, along with Attorney General Eric Holder, can stop these kinds of foolish and expensive incarcerations for cannabis by de-funding the federal grants provided to local law enforcement and their ‘multi-jursidictional anti-drug task forces’, like JET, the Jackson Enforcement Team, which boasts of Mr. Sekul’s arrest.


How many fewer Americans would be arrested annually if the federal government didn’t fund local arrests?


Exactly how many taxpayer dollars could be saved if the expense and trouble of local cannabis arrests were not subsidized by the feds?

Thank You for your Comment

We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Don Earl
    Gee, let's just legalize and tax all criminal activities.

    What sort of tax revenue could be raised by taxing loan sharks and numbers runners? How about murder for hire? Those guys must make big bucks. Or how about blackmail and extortion? And, why just marijuana , the potential tax revenue from heroin and cocaine would have to be off the charts.

    It's interesting to note the folks who are less than NORMAL fail to note the weapons charges against their favorite dope dealer. Apparently their hero was ready, willing and able to kill anyone who got in the way of his criminal enterprise. Poor fellow! What's this country coming to when a prosecutor stoops so low as to seek a long prison term for this breed of criminal?

    If the hot drug topic of the day is clearing up misconceptions, maybe we should take a closer look at the connection between pot and brain damage. Something in these guys' heads is obviously broken. Of course, I suppose it's possible they were really that stupid before they became drug addicts.

    - Don EarlUS November 15, 2009 1:03PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Trogo
      Read more, and learn more

      Don,
      Privy to the knowledge that we all have the opportunity to seek our own opinions in all matters, I appreciate your expression. However, your candor and direction seems quite misguided. Your first paragraph seems to imply that all things dangerous or seemingly harmful should be illegal . In that case maybe we should make the following illegal: alcohol , sugar, caffeine , nicotine, trans fats, or fugu (the puffer fish used in sushi that contains tetrodotoxin). Of course, by doing such, we would essentially be removing a persons inalienable right to choose for ones own self. That would be quite unconstitutional, of which, the current cannabis prohibition laws do very well.

      I also noticed that he had guns in the initial report as you mentioned, and to be honest, it made me cringe. That's mostly because I am not a big fan of guns. But, people do have their right to have guns, and whether or not someone grows cannabis or does anything, else does not automatically implicate them as a murderer or gangster. I have known many people who had dozens of guns, but that sure doesn't make them a potentially dangerous citizen.

      Now for your loose attempt at infusing brain damage and cannabis together as a coherent bond is weak and inherently incorrect. There are numerous studies that have found that cannabis does not cause brain damage, and actually stimulates the growth of new neurons.
      ( http://www.jci.org/articles/view/25509/version/1 )

      Lastly, you make the quick claim that anyone that consumes cannabis is a drug addict, which is a misnomer. Broad generalizations such as that are quite indicative more of your egregiously impotent attempts at inflating your own ego, and the surfacing arrogance and ignorance consumed by your id. Why, by your same logic, anyone that has more than one drink a night, at least one cup of coffee per day, or one cigarette per day, or even a small amount of sugar a day is a drug addict. Remember they are all drugs !

      If you wish to learn more about the truth and positive sides of cannabis, I would be delighted to point you in the direction of some very recent and interesting studies. Otherwise, please continue your anthropoidal mimicry and throw feces at the problems faced by society ! Cheers!

      - TrogoUS November 15, 2009 5:39PM

      Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • Don Earl
        You confuse "facts" with "rationalizations".


        It gets real old after awhile listening to drug addicts trying to defend their addictions with the most absurd rationalizations imaginible. It's not that I'm unaware of the fact, it's that you are unable to face facts.

        I own guns and fully support the right to keep and bear arms, so I do not share your Pollyanna view that there is something wrong with owning guns as far as ownership in and of itself is concerned.

        For there to be weapons charges in this case means this person acquired or possessed the weapons illegally. That is NOT something Second Amendment supporters endorse. On the contrary, it is the fact that dangerous criminals are able to obtain weapons illegally, that is most often cited as a reason for law abiding citizens to keep and bear arms.

        Much like a drunk who is convinced he is driving just fine, you are quite obviously unaware of the degree to which your mental capacity has been diminised by your drug addiction . You claim you are not an addict, yet your addiction is so well established that YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY POWERLESS TO QUIT. The fact is you couldn't quit even if you wanted to. You freely admit you would rather risk going to prison than face the terror of withdrawl. "Terror" and "withdrawl" are accurate descriptions. Without the drugs , you are afraid of everything. If you stop using, your fear becomes so unbearable the only relief you can find is to take more drugs. As your addiction progresses, the length of time you are able to endure the terror of being without drugs becomes shorter and shorter. You do not control your life. The drug controls your life.

        Furthermore, your financial support of armed felons creates a clear and present danger to society as a whole, including me personally. While this fact is one you chose to ignore and refuse to acknowledge, I do not share the drug induced mental impairment required to take such facts lightly.

        Since I don't enjoy talking to people of diminished mental capacity, I will not respond further on the topic. If you ever reach a point where you can stay off drugs long enough to engage in lucid, rational conversation, maybe we can kick it around further. While that's an exceedingly rare event in the lives of drug addicts, it is not unprecedented.

        - Don EarlUS November 15, 2009 8:58PM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • Trogo
          Subjectivity is not rationalization

          It is all fine with me that you wish to not discuss this further, but I recommend you think more intently before you type. I never said I was an addict or even consume drugs . On the contrary, I have worked at several drug rehabilitation facilities, and help drug addicts (including alcoholics), often. That is where I derive my knowledge. Secondly, I do not have a "Pollyanna" view of the world. I simply stated that I do not particularly care for guns , but I do believe people have the right to own them.

          So, yet again, please delve deeper than you are letting yourself, and maybe you'll be surprised that issues like our current drug policy are not so black and white. It is apparent that your perception of the world is horribly jaded, and if that makes you happen then by all means continue forth. Enjoy your life, but we all still have to get along.

          Please ask question first, before making assumptions as you have already done. It is flagrantly arrogant to make such assumptions of a person without having any knowledge that individual.

          - TrogoUS November 15, 2009 9:40PM

          Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • freetheweed
      You need to be informed Brother!!!

      Until about 1800, hempseed oil was the most consumed lighting oil in America and the world.

      Until the 1870s, it was the second-most consumed lighting oil, exceeded only by whale oil. It was then replaced by petroleum, kerosene, etc., after the 1859 Pennsylvania oil discovery and John D. Rockefeller’s 1870-on national petroleum stewardship.

      In 1850 there were 8,327 hemp plantations (minimum 2,000-acre farms) growing cannabis hemp for cloth, canvas and even the cordage used for baling cotton.

      In 1865, there were no slaves to harvest hemp, and no machinery to do the job. Most of the plantations were located in the South or in the border states, and the lack of labor defused the hemp industry in the United States, and from that point, most of our hemp came from outside the country.


      By 1916, the USDA forecast that a decorticating and harvesting machine would be developed, and hemp would again be America’s largest agricultural industry.

      As predicted, in 1916, 50-year-old George Schlichten created a simple yet brilliant invention. He spent 18 years and $400,000 on the decorticator, a machine that could strip the fiber from nearly any plant, leaving the pulp behind. WWI took a toll on the economy though, and the decorticator was shelved.

      It resurfaced in the 1930's, when it was touted as the machine that would make hemp a “Billion Dollar Crop”. Once again, the burgeoning hemp industry was halted, this time by the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937.

      In 1935 alone, 116 million pounds (58,000 tons) of hempseed were used in America just for paint and varnish. The hemp drying oil business went principally to DuPont petro- chemicals .

      Until 1937, 70-90% of all rope, twine, and cordage was made from hemp. It was then replaced mostly by petrochemical fibers (owned principally by DuPont) and by Manila (Abaca) Hemp.

      In 1938, Popular Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering introduced a new generation of investors to fully operational hemp decorticating devices. Because of this machine, both publications said that hemp would soon be America’s number-one crop. The agriculture industry was the last to know, that hemp was about to be criminalized.

      In 1942, after the Japanese invasion of the Philippines cut off the supply of Manila hemp, the U.S. government distributed 400,000 pounds of cannabis seeds to American farmers who produced 42,000 tons of hemp fiber annually until 1946 when the war ended.

      And then, prohibition against marijuana , a term few Americans had ever heard for hemp/cannabis, was put into practice

      - freetheweedUS November 15, 2009 8:15PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • LibertynJusticeforall
      Fallacies of a Prohibitionist

      Gee, let's just legalize all crimes is the last fallacious argument of a truly propagandist regime. No one is calling for that because the other crimes cause harm to OTHER citizens. As far as marijuana goes the only harm associated with it is caused by prohibition.

      Although you are correct about one thing, the lies and misconceptions must be cleared up. Your misconception about cannabis and brain damage goes back to one of the first studies done under the Nixon administration. They wanted to prove a link between cannabis and brain damage so they gave monkeys highly concentrated cannabis smoke for 5mins at a time. The monkeys experienced brain damage due to asphyxiation. Then they released the result while refusing to release documentation of how the experiment was conducted. 20 years later, when the documentation was released it became a prime example of how not to conduct a proper experiment! An experiment they preformed in 1974 at University of Virginia with human brain cells showed that THC leaves normal brain cells alone while completely killing human brain cancer cells (glioblastoma multiforme, or GBM). Like the previous experiment they only released the results. An edited result at that; saying that THC kills brain cells. After 1998 when the documents were leaked, scientists in Spain reconstructed the experiment and found the same result, THC kills brain cancer cells leaving normal brain cells alone. A group of molecular pharmacologists in California reconstructed the experiment as well and recorded the results. It can be seen here; http://thesethgroup.org /. The final nail in the prohibitionist's coffin was when they had to patent THC and other Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants before the Seth Group could.

      US Patent 6630507
      Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants
      US Patent Issued on October 7, 2003
      Assigned To:
      The United States of America as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services
      http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6630507.html

      I could go on for a week about things like the content of cannabinoid 2-AG in all mammal's breast milk or the fact that every animal that evolved after the sea cucumber, except insects, has a endocannabinoid system or the fact that our body needs Omega-6 fatty acid so it can produce cannabinoids on demand, but I must get back to work on my PhD.

      I hope I have been able to enlighten you or at least inspire you and others to seek the truth for yourself, not just believe the propagandist lies of the prohibitionists.

      For man will never be free, until the last prohibitionist is strangled with the lies of the last propagandist! - Diderot 2009

      - LibertynJusticeforallUS November 16, 2009 6:13AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Clay
    Poor don

    If you check your statistics don,you'll find that very few marijuana busts involve shootouts,or even resisting arrest ,and yes,people own guns ,but as with most Americans ,protection and sport shooting is something even potheads do. If you want to see the shootouts in involving police on drug busts by our sacred drug cops,go to: drugwarrant.com and look at the list of over 50 people that have died during drug raids in the US.
    Please also note that most of the people shot were not even in possession of any drugs ,and many were killed in raids at the wrong house ,by the police supposedly protecting us from evil.
    That you believe that marijuana is your demon is fine,I hope you always feel that way and never use it.

    - ClayUS November 15, 2009 8:52PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • pam
    Own guns? Help legalize pot.

    Gun ownership is a constitutional right. I hate guns but it's our right to own one. That said, I have observed that many people who own guns also like their weed and many like their personal liberty to grow their own weed too. So, I propose that the movers of the gun liberation front also join on to the front to end prohibition of marijuana . With both parties working together, this injustice can end a lot quicker than the 40 years it has taken to exist.

    - pamUS November 16, 2009 9:11AM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...