Indiana Man Sentenced to 80 Months for Child Pornography

Share This Story

James M. Tanksley, 52, pleaded guilty today to two counts of receipt of child pornography and one count of possession of child pornography and was sentenced to 80 months in prison.

Tanksley, a resident of Indianapolis, was also sentenced today by U.S. District Court Judge Sarah Evans Barker to lifetime supervised release following completion of his prison term.

During today’s plea and sentencing hearing before Judge Barker, Tanksley admitted to being a member of two Internet-based bulletin board groups dedicated to the trading of child pornography. The groups, comprised of members from around the world, could only be accessed using a unique username and password. The groups had very detailed rules for behavior, including requiring all members to post only pornographic images or videos depicting minors under the age of 18. Members were also required to post their images or videos in pre-established categories based on the type of material, such as hardcore videos or individual images of girls aged 0-6.

Tanksley admitted he was an active participant on both bulletin boards and that his involvement dated from June 2006 to May 2007. Tanksley also admitted that on some occasions he commented on the quality of the child pornography he received from other members; expressed his gratification upon seeing the images or videos; and described the sexual acts the children, some younger than approximately 6 years old, engaged in. Through his plea, Tanksley also admitted to possessing child pornography.

Tanksley was identified through "Operation Joint Hammer," the U.S. component of an ongoing global enforcement operation targeting transnational rings of child pornographers. The operation has led to the arrest of more than 60 people in the United States involved in the trade of child pornography. Operation Joint Hammer was initiated through evidence developed by European law enforcement and shared with U.S. counterparts by Europol and Interpol. The European portion of this global enforcement effort, "Operation Koala," was launched after the discovery of the activities of several people in Europe who were abusing children and producing photographs of the abuse for commercial gain. Further investigation unveiled a number of online child pornography rings.

Share This Story

`
Human-Stupidity-dot-com's picture

This is a rare case where someone convicted for possession of child porn actually might have been instrumental in promoting child abuse . But it is far from sure.

So for maybe potentially inciting harm to children , he gets 80 months. Probably more then any nanny who gets videotaped beating toddlers, and shaking them in ways that they could suffer spinal cord and head injuries.

http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/lynching-adolescent-video-is-legal-but-nude-adolescent-photos-felony-crime

How come youtube owners don't get 80 months for showing child whipping?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC_wO6eyWIE&feature=related

Or toddler mistreatment?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2A05x9VRHUI&feature=related

I wish someone researched if the people who put their baby into the microwave, did they get 80 monts? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZdPVTjt9wc&feature=related

Once more, 80 months for having bad taste and liking to watch photos of abuse ? What am I getting wrong ?

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FCE504D86FF09EAB
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=928CDD1E6F36B5E2

caelum's picture

Nice to see a pervert off the street. Purchasing the child pornography yourself is almost like aiding and abetting the act of child exploitation yourself. Unfortunately, it doesn't fully fit the 3-part test for it so they can't be charged that way - but I wish the could =(

As a side note, it must be awful to have to work in the prosecutors office / FBI and police departments because you would have to look at and watch that crap to confirm what is was. Disgusting.

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

OV Social