Illinois Parental Notification Law Delayed, Again

Share This Story

From 1 jaw-dropping roadblock to the next, IL's parental notification law has been stopped from going into effect for 14 long years, since it passed in 1995.

First, for over a decade, the IL Supreme Court simply refused to establish judicial-bypass rules.

After the Supremes finally wrote rules, the ACLU and Planned Parenthood sued. A federal court ruled against them 4 months ago.

Then the IL Dept. of Financial and Professional Regulation, with no legal authority whatsoever, "accepted the recommendations of members of its Medical Disciplinary Board" to enact a 90-day grace period to give abortion mills time to prepare new procedures, since 14 years wasn't long enough.

The 90 days was up today. Today, finally, the IL Parental Notice of Abortion Act was due to take effect.

But the ACLU sued again, and today the IDFPR - illegally - delayed the law's enactment again. It is meeting tomorrow to decide - illegally - whether to extend the grace period.

And the plot thickens. No surprise, this being IL, the players have connections.

Our lawyers on the case, the Thomas More Society, have learned that 1 of the 6 members of the IDFPR, Robert Fernandez, is partner in a law firm that represents Planned Parenthood of IL.

Fernandez, abortion, pro-life, Illinois parental notification.jpg

"And, it gets worse," wrote TMS in a press release.

Brent Adams, secretary of the IDFPR, is a board member of the powerful Personal PAC, IL's leading pro-abortion lobbying group, and listed by Crain's Chicago Business as 1 of the top 10 contributors to IL political campaigns in 2008.

Adams' resume also lists him as a past member of the Board of Directors of the ACLU of IL.

As an aside, I've always thought it odd that the head of Personal PAC, Terry Cosgrove, is a (male) homosexual.

For all the feminist criticism of male involvement in "a woman's right to choose," I don't hear a peep from them here.

And it turns out Brent Adams is a homosexual, too, and HIV+.

Homosexual support of abortion makes total sense, as I've repeatedly said. Homosexuals and pro-aborts are flip sides of the same coin. Both want to commit illicit sex with no consequences.

But I digress. It appears the fix is in.

Share This Story

`
JBarnett's picture

You ARE in rare form today!

"For all the feminist criticism of male involvement in "a woman's right to choose," I don't hear a peep from them here"

That would be because this particular male isn't trying to TAKE AWAY A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE.

"As an aside, I've always thought it odd that the head of Personal PAC, Terry Cosgrove, is a (male) homosexual...And it turns out Brent Adams is a homosexual, too, and HIV +...
Homosexual support of abortion makes total sense, as I've repeatedly said. Homosexuals and pro-aborts are flip sides of the same coin. Both want to commit illicit sex with no consequences"

My GOD woman, can you be any more offensive and nauseating? Not to mention racist and homophobic? Most of your lastest diatribe is nothing more than your personal opinion. And unless the individuals involved are underaged, how can sex between consenting adults be "illicit"?

"Illicit: illegal , unlawful, dishonest, banned, prohibited, forbidden, etc. etc."

So, are you also against comprehensive sex education and the use of birth control too?
One of those "Abstinence Only" bigots?

Jill Stanek, you absolutely sicken me; excuse me while I go vomit a little.

User Removed's picture

As Ms. Stanek makes clear, it isn't abortion she's against, but "illicit" sex . In other words, she believes she has a right to make her various perversions and sick fantasies a matter of law .

Among the sickest platforms of these sexual deviants is their open endorsement of a rapists "right" to breed anyone woman they are able to take by force. Of course, that's understandable considering most of their heros are child molesting priests. In fact, it's the baby raping priests who are most vocal in insisting women of child bearing age be required to provide then with a never ending inventory of unwanted children to fulfil their sick pleasures.

Is it surprising that any woman not willing to participate in pro life , child molesting, sexual predator, rape fantasies is labeled a "feminist"? Considering the source, nothing is surprising. They're some of the most twisted psychopaths on the face of the planet.

LagerHead's picture

YEA. The only people that believe life begins at conception are rapists and child molesters. YEA. Hell Yea! You make one hell of a logical argument. The only reason one could possibly be against abortion is to provide pedophiles with more targets.

I would tell you how insanely idiotic, bigoted, and just plain asinine that sounds, but why waste my "breath"? Truly, I am speechless at this level of ignorance.

User Removed's picture

On one hand we have perverted sycophants trolling for unwanted children to sacrifice to their pedophile priests. And on the other, anyone who isn't willing to play rape bait for these sickos is a murderer.

Insane? Indeed.

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

OV Social

 

randomness