Horse Racing -- Money More Important than Horses' Health
by Amanda Schinke
What's more important to the racing industry: horses or money?
If you thought horses, we've found two recent news stories that will change your mind.
Consider this: Thanks to a lawsuit involving the co-owners of former Kentucky Derby favorite I Want Revenge, it's become even clearer how often horses used in the racing industry are dangerously overmedicated. Horses are given anti-inflammatory steroids and painkillers to keep them running even after they've been injured—and of 20 trainers interviewed by The New York Times, only three were willing to turn over their veterinary records.
The New York Times also reports, "[T]here is a consensus among equine researchers and surgeons that legal medications and cortisone shots, over time, leave a horse vulnerable to a catastrophic breakdown."
In other words, even the legal drugs that the racing industry pumps into horses make horrific incidents like the one at last year's Kentucky Derby more likely. This is what PETA has been saying since Eight Belles crashed to the track with two broken ankles in the 2008 Kentucky Derby.
Meanwhile, ESPN reports that the owners of Lava Man—a famous horse forced to "retire" early because of injuries—are trying to squeeze a few more bucks out of the old fella by bringing him back onto the track. According to ESPN, because of his previous injuries, Lava Man is at great risk of suffering a catastrophic breakdown on the track and says that while "[n]ot a single national media outlet will cover Lava Man's comeback race," "every single one would cover a disastrous outcome. … Pick your letters: ESPN, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, or, worse yet, PETA."
Darn skippy.
Time after time, the racing industry risks animals' lives for an extra dollar. Forget the finish line—it's all about the bottom line.

I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY WITH PETA - ANIMALS ARE NOT FOR US TO USE AND ABUSE. I PROMOTE VEGETARIANISM BECAUSE OF THE CRUELTY TO THE ANIMALS WHICH ARE SLAUGHTERED INHUMANELY FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION. I AM 60 YEARS OLD AND HAVE BEEN A VEGETARIAN FOR APP. 32 YEARS. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK PETA, I AM BEHIND YOU 100%
ALAYNA STAGGERS
I appreciate the words of support . Brought a smile to my face PETA will remain strong and an advocate for the animals . Blessings
I am so glad to hear words of encouragement for those who truly CARE for animals and have a sensitive heart for the suffering they endure for the pleasure and profit of people,
We live in a very callous and heartless world where greed and self centeredness supercedes compassion. Alayna Staggers, nurse and mom.
How many animals do you care for? How much time to you personally give going out and caring for animals? Or do you just sit on you behind and type out what everyone else should be doing when you are not?
There is your answer. For the Love Of God, we just try to do our best.
I'm guessing you don't have any pets ?
I have 3 dogs and have had dogs my whole 60 years.
PETA Employees Face Felony Animal Cruelty Charges
In the early hours of June 15, 2005, two employees of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) were arrested in Ahoskie, North Carolina, and charged with 31 felony counts of cruelty to animals . A Grand Jury later indicted each defendant on 21 counts of Animal Cruelty and 3 counts of Obtaining Property By False Pretenses. PETA employees Andrew Cook and Adria Hinkle are expected to face a trial in Hertford County (NC) Superior Court on November 13, 2006. A few days after the arrests, local authorities told Greenville, North Carolina's WNCT-TV News that they had found more than 70 additional dead animals that may be connected to PETA.
When Ahoskie police arrested Cook and Hinkle, they discovered 18 dead animals in a shopping-center dumpster (including a bag containing dead puppies), and 13 more dead animals (including two kittens) in the PETA-owned van the two were driving . Police observed them throwing several dark-colored bags into the dumpster before the arrests were made. The animal-cruelty investigator for the Northampton County (North Carolina) sheriff's department shared her outrage with the Virginian-Pilot a few days after the arrests: "Some animals have to be euthanized," she told the paper, "but the way this crowd did it is sick."
Witnesses from the Bertie County (NC) Animal Shelter and the Ahoskie Animal Hospital later confirmed that the defendants had collected animals earlier that day on the promise that PETA would find them adoptive homes. And a Bertie County deputy sheriff told reporters that Cook and Hinkle assured the shelter "they were picking up the dogs to take them back to Norfolk where they would find them good homes," later adding that persons identifying themselves as PETA representatives have picked up live dogs from that shelter during the last two months.
Ahoskie veterinarian Dr. Patrick Proctor told reporters that his staff gave a perfectly healthy cat and her two newborn kittens to Hinkle and Cook. "This cat and two kittens I gave them last week," he said, "were in good health and were very adoptable, especially the kittens." Dr. Proctor later added in the Virginian-Pilot: "These were just kittens we were trying to find homes for. PETA said they would do that, but these cats never made it out of the county."
One Norfolk television station aired a heartbreaking interview with the manager of the supermarket whose dumpster became an impromptu pet cemetery. "They just slung the doors [open] and started throwing dogs ... beautiful cats. I saw a [dead] beagle last week that was pregnant ... last week it was 23 or 24 dogs ... it's happened to us nine times ... they drove straight from there, straight here, and disposed of the dogs in 30 seconds."
Another TV news report in PETA's home town revealed in June 2005 that Hinkle and Cook were not licensed to euthanize animals. "We have no records of training PETA employees," a Virginia Department of Agriculture spokesperson told Norfolk, Virginia's WAVY-TV10 News, "because we were informed that euthanasia was being done by a local veterinarian." Neither defendant has a veterinary degree.
EXACTLY!!!
I can only speak for myself and what I do. If I see an animal in need, I do my best to care for it. I have 3 dogs and they get the best my money can buy. I will do without to provide for them.
I prefer to see the good that others do. I know that "People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals" makes people angry. Why? I am PETA . I do what I can for the animals . Just as in the church I belong to; I am responsible to God for what I do and how I live my life. I am a Seventh-day Adventist. I am....a vegetarian ; I am the best nurse, mom and grandmom I can be. God only asks of me to follow my moral values even if others in an organization fail. I am all of these things at the exclusion of other people's opinion. It is how I live my life that matters and I am for the ethical treatment of animals and saving unborn babies from abortion and preserving the dignity of the elderly at the end of their life. To look at others and compare my actions and beliefs only gives me an excuse not to do my best.