Glenn Beck Will Come Crashing Down, Like All Demagogues

By Rob Boston

Now that Glenn Beck’s Lincoln Memorial rally is over, it’s time to step back and ask the all-important question: What the heck was that all about?

Beck portrayed the “Restoring Honor” event as a celebration of civil rights. But the reporting I read about the bombastic Fox News Channel host’s D.C. get together made some of it sound more like a fundamentalist religious revival.

“Something that is beyond man is happening,” Beck told the crowd. “America today begins to turn back to God.”

Beck claims his event was intended to be non-political, but the rally featured Sarah Palin as a speaker, and the very next day Beck went on national television and attacked President Barack Obama’s religion. (Obama’s fault? He fails to agree with Beck.)

Beck is stomping over well-trod ground. His real enemy isn’t racial injustice. He’s far too polarizing a figure to achieve a noble goal like bringing people together and healing racial discord. In fact, Beck is just another in a seemingly endless line of far-right blowhards seeking to curry favor with the ignoramus brigades of the Religious Right by bashing the wall of separation between church and state.

Backed by “Professor” David Barton – who is not a professor and not a historian – Beck unleashes the usual Religious Right line about America’s glorious Christian heritage with strident calls to win the country “back” from nefarious forces that have supposedly usurped it.

It’s an old story. Throughout our history, the nation has occasionally been seduced by extremists who play the fear card, warning darkly of dangerous forces that must be stopped before they destroy the country.

In the 1950s, it was Communists. In the 1960s, it was African Americans seeking civil rights and their “hippy” allies. In the 1970s, it was feminists. In the 1980s and ‘90s, it was gays. In the 2000s, it has been Muslims.

Demagogues are always looking for a new bogeyman to wave before their legions; they are always looking for a new group to demonize. It’s essential for whipping up the mob.

Beck is aiming to create a new enemy for the next decade: Anyone who dares to support church-state separation and its key partner, secular government.

This last point is important. The Religious Right is increasingly assailing a key component of American life – the idea that government should be neutral on matters of theology, a principle that is the essence of secular government. Beck wants to lead this new charge.

In doing so, Beck attacks our traditions. Remember, until the United States separated church and state, the idea that a government could be secular was unthinkable. America’s experiment worked so well that it caught on in other nations.

America’s leadership in this area should be a source of pride. Yet it infuriates the theocrats among us. They are spitting mad that they can no longer tap the power of the state to force everyone to live under their narrow definition of theology.

Beck is a Mormon, and it’s unlikely his religion would ever be embraced by the government. But he’s more than happy to lead the charge for a “Christian” government, well aware that on social issues like abortion, same-sex marriage, censorship and others, Mormons, fundamentalist Protestants and ultra-Orthodox Catholics often see eye to eye.

Beck, who claims to revere the Founding Fathers, is actually trying to undermine their handiwork. He is a shameless demagogue with access to millions nightly over the airwaves. His ascent is alarming, but it’s important that we keep a historical perspective in mind.

We’ve been down this road before. Father Charles Coughlin spewed his poison over the radio across the nation. Sen. Joseph McCarthy used television to engage in red baiting. Gerald L.K. Smith blasted his hate from a quasi-national pulpit.

The good news is that demagogues usually overreach and come crashing down. In my opinion, it can’t happen to Beck soon enough. But until it does, those of us who support real religious freedom and church-state separation need to be on guard.

After all, we are the target.

Defender's picture

"Sen. Joseph McCarthy used television to engage in red baiting."
Doesn't alter the fact that Hollywood WAS and IS full of socialists. There's even a Democratic Socialist Party of the USA faction in Congress today, so it appears McCarthy may have been onto something.
Rep. CAROLYN McCarthy wants guns banned, but knows so litttle about them that she thinks a rifle barrel heat shield is "a shoulder thing that goes up." She's willing to have a civil war over it, and she will if they ever declare them illegal to possess and mandate turning them in. The idea gets tossed around more than ever.
As crime prevention, it has been a dismal failure everywhere. As a way of stifling real opposition, it has been a smashing success.

call me Roy's picture

your article sounds like "your" the one who is crashing?
It is easy to see from your article that you will never understand what the rally was all about?
Beck is aiming to create a new enemy for the next decade? No Rob. an enemy forever.
Progressives wanted a thorough transformation in America’s principles of government, from a government permanently dedicated to securing individual liberty to one whose ends and scope would change to take on any and all social and economic ills. What questions has Beck been asking?
1) What did Progressives think about the American founding, and why did they want to eradicate its principles?
2) How did we get today’s excessively powerful presidency from the Progressives?
3) What was the connection between Progressivism and Socialism? Were the Progressives actually Socialists?
4) What are some of the critical connections between Progressivism and what’s going on in our country today?
For decades now, the 'progressives' (liberals or 'The Left') in our country have been propelled by two powerful influences: Saul Alinsky and Cloward and Piven. (Of course, Marx and Engels figure in, too, but why state the obvious?) In 1966, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven authored an article in "The Nation" magazine that has been followed as closely as a blueprint by organizations such as ACORN and, dare I say, the Democrat Party (at least the present-day incarnation of the Democrat Party). Incredibly, we are seeing the fruits of that seditious strategy in the news everyday. And I say 'seditious' advisedly, because the end result will be the capitulation of our national sovereignty and way of life to those who seek to control us and rule over us.
Nice try Rob but: No cigar

.

J-Jammer's picture

List all who talked and tell me all the bad things they said.

Not what you wish them to have said (as you did above) but what they said specifically stated.

People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

 

randomness