Free Speech in Conn. - Catholics Need Not Apply

Share This Story

Default Image

Catholic League president Bill Donohue addresses the state of free speech for Catholics in Connecticut:

Three months ago, two lawmakers from Connecticut sought a state takeover of the governing structure of the Catholic Church. This gambit, which we properly labeled a “fascist stunt,” lost. The reason it lost is because of the courageous reaction of Catholics, led by their bishops, and organizations like the Catholic League. Among the steps taken to thwart this unconstitutional abridgement of religious liberty was a rally at the state Capitol.

In retaliation, some state officials are now seeking to penalize the Roman Catholic Diocese of Bridgeport, led by Bishop William E. Lori. They have accused the Bridgeport Diocese of breaking the state’s lobbying laws. On May 29, Bishop Lori filed suit seeking an injunction to stop the punitive measures from being implemented.

What is at stake is practically every liberty enshrined in the First Amendment: freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, religious liberty and the provision guaranteeing separation of church and state. First the tyrants sought to take control of the Catholic Church, and now their lackeys are trying to muzzle the free speech of Catholics. Had this been reversed—had the bishops sought to take command of the legislative functions of the state of Connecticut and then proceeded to get a gag order placed on lawmakers—everyone who is now silent would be apoplectic.

Just last month, there was a rally in Hartford demanding universal health care. According to Courant.com, approximately 140 “clergy and religious folks marched to the state Capitol to ask to talk. They wore clerical collars, suit coats and hijabs, and chanted and carried signs that said, ‘Muslims for Health Care,’ and ‘Health Care for All.’” This rally occasioned no threats by state officials of any kind.

Share This Story

`
quantummechanik's picture

Catholics don't have the right to Free Speech anywhere. If tyrannical lackeys muzzling the opinions of catholics counts as not having free speech, then no you don' have it.

The same Bishop Lori that you were talking about is leading an "inquest" into another Catholic priest, Father Peter Chan. The reason he's doing this is because Chan suggested, in a book he wrote, that:
* Non-Christian religions have a positive role in salvation history in their own right, and are not merely a preparation for the Christian Gospel;
* It makes little sense to try to convert non-Christians to Christianity;
* It would be better to avoid terms such as "unique," "absolute" and "universal" for the saving role of Christ;
* The Holy Spirit operates in a saving way in non-Christian religions independently of the Logos (meaning Christ as the Word of God);
* The Catholic Church cannot be identified with the church of Christ;
* God's covenant with the Jewish people does not find its completion in Jesus Christ.

For these heresies, there's actually a guy leading an INQUISITION into the man.

No. No you do not have free speech. But you should be pretty used to that by now.

Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter

OV Social

 

randomness