Quantcast
Politics

Fred "Gopher" Grandy Criticizes Muslims, Loses Radio Gig

Former Congressman and "The Love Boat" actor Fred Grandy is out of his job as a radio host in Washington, D.C. after criticizing Muslims. But the question remains -- did he quit or was he fired?

Grandy and his wife, Catherine, who is known on the air as "Mrs. Fred," hosted the morning show on WMAL. According to a report in London's Daily Mail, Grandy told the group Accuracy in Media, "My wife and I have used our program over the last several months to warn about the spread of radical Islam at home and abroad.

"Last week, Catherine delivered a very tough indictment against stealth jihad, and for her efforts she was told she was off the show. I then told management without Mrs. Fred at the microphone, I could not remain either and have resigned effective this morning."

While Grandy claims he was forced out, WMAL insists that he resigned on his own. "Fred Grandy has informed WMAL of his intention to resign from the station and its morning program, The Grandy Group," a spokesman said.

Grandy's supporters say WMAL gave in to pressure from the Muslim lobbying group Council on American Islamic-Relations (CAIR), to which its Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper responded, "What is the evidence for that claim?"

Grandy has no evidence, either, saying, "We cannot affirmatively conclude CAIR or any of the prominent Islamic organizations had anything to do with this."

Although he added, "We do know, however, in 2005 representatives of CAIR in D.C. were successful in getting mid-morning host Michael Graham fired for anti-Islamic statements he had made on the radio and TV."

Grandy was elected as a Republican Congressman from Iowa in 1986. He lost his seat in 1994. But he is best known, of course,for playing the lovable purser "Gopher" on the "The Love Boat" for nine seasons.

Get More:

Comments

gladyssev's picture

Once I initially commented I

Once I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new feedback are added- checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get 4 emails with the identical comment. Is there any manner you may remove me from that service? Thanks! rederme hydrographic hcg weight loss Dustcover epic auto insurance pachycheilia

MediaNeedsABackbone's picture

foolsDefendIslam

http://www.youtube.com/watch #!v=ggQXpeSQ-rg

sorry for the last post. THIS LINK WORKS!
copy & paste if you have too.
this YOUNG woman
was put in prison for THREE YEARS because she "didn't want to wear the scarf". 3 years in prison, 5 rapes, beatings, and her leg was mangled, the MAGGOTS cames to help her.....maybe they prevented gangarene. do NOT EVER defend islam . only a fool does that.

then the crazies in the USA media FIRE a woman who WARNS of the evils of islam. what is CRAZY about THAT picture? duh. double ding dong. duh duh

how EVER did the media gush all around about a man with TWO moslem fathers who was running for president? dingdong double dingdong. duh. dey dint doo dare homwerk did day? duh.

MediaNeedsABackbone's picture

foolsDefendIslam

http://www.youtube.com/watch #!v=ggQXpeSQ-rg hates islam
copy & paste the above link if necessary.

the college woman in this clip didn't want to wear 'the scarf". for that she got 3 YEARS in prison, raped 5 times by her interogaters who beat her and MANGLED her leg. don't EVER makes whining excuses for islam. if you do, you are a FOOL.

homoreal's picture

WHAT

ON AN OBVIOUSLY VERY POLITICALLY RIGHT/TEA PARTY STATION, JUST WHAT DID SHE SAY THAT CAUSED THE PROBLEM. I HAVE READ YOUR RAILING ABOUT THE IMPROPRIETY OF IT ALL, BUT NOWHERE CAN I FIND OUT WHAT SHE SAID. AND IF IT WERE SO TERRIBLE, WE ARE TO BELIEVE THAT WHOMEVER SPONSORS THIS STATION WOULD PUT UP WITH IT. WHAT DID SHE SAY?

MrBook's picture

huh?

So what did his wife say?

And if he has no evidence that CAIR was involved then why say that they were?

ripple's picture

No Evidence ?

This is why he intimated that CAIR was probably involved:

Although he added, "We do know, however, in 2005 representatives of CAIR in D.C. were successful in getting mid-morning host Michael Graham fired for anti-Islamic statements he had made on the radio and TV ."

I don't know if you were around, or aware, at this time. I remember this well. It is as if 9/11 never happened in the minds of most Americans.

MrBook's picture

we know?

Adding "we know" to a statement does not constitute evidence that that statement is true.

What exactly did they do to get him fired?

ripple's picture

Yes, we know

In July 2005, Graham used Islam and terrorism as the basis for a multi-day discussion on his WMAL talk radio show.[4] A number of Graham's comments prompted over one hundred complaints to the station and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) issued action alerts to its subscribers encouraging them to contact WMAL to urge that "Graham be reprimanded for his anti-Islam statements",[5] ultimately prompting WMAL to suspend him. After 28 days, WMAL elected to terminate Graham stating that he violated station policy and disregarded "management direction" to redress the situation.[6] The situation prompted angry editorials from Graham [7] as well as appearances on nationally televised news programs to discuss the firing.[8][9]

MrBook's picture

protest?

So CAIR protested something he said? Sounds like they used their constitutional rights to do so.

It sounds like it was the stations choice, not CAIR's to fire Graham... not CAIR's. Indeed CAIR only seems to ask that he be reprimanded, not fired.

Unless you can show that CAIR used violence, the threat of violence, or encouraged people to use violence all that happened here was US citizens exercising their right to protest something they disagreed with.

Remember we have freedom of speech... not freedom from criticism.

nikosbuster's picture

Does it matter?

#1- their is a direct attack from ANY anti muslim comments coming directly from our government and I am sure its from Nobama. Funny thing is the Muslims have all these rights, of freedom or religion and speech, but when one speaks against Islam or Muslims the tables are turned. ts truly a double standard- and the King investigation is a perfect example- he has said from Day #1- this is about the radicalization of Muslims here in the US- not once did he say all Muslims are subject to this and frankly he is doing the right thing. No Muslims were killed or beaten in the USA after 9/11- but the effort to silence anyone who opposed their views and goals for this country is labeled a bigot, facist, racist and every other word imaginable. I would like to hear what was said as well, but this is the reality in this country today.

MrBook's picture

direct?

Which anti Muslim comments have been directly attacked by the US Government?

And last time I checked everyones freedom of religion, and freedom to criticize other religions is intact... the only difference is that some Muslims, like some Christians, get all riled up when their religious beliefs are criticized.

nikosbuster's picture

examples

#1- Juan Williams-
#2- Psycho preacher in Fla- for the burn the Qaran day- right wrong or indifferent. The Sec of Defense and his office calls him?
#3- Why has the Fort Hood- suspect not once been referred to as a Islamic extremist?
#4- The killing of 2 soldiers in Germany- not once has that been referred to as an attack by a Muslims.
#5- Each protest against the Mosque this summer was totally twisted and mis-represented. As an attendee I experienced this first hand, and since I have lived 2 blocks from the site- I can open up all the lies on this issue.
#6- Dearborn Michigan- You cannot stand on a street corner and hand out pamphlets promoting the church, its on film and the people were arrested. Last time I checked that was part of our freedom as well,

if you really believe this is not the case, then so be it. But DO NOT TELL me that there is not a serious turning of the tables on this issue.

MrBook's picture

one to ten

1) that was a decision by NPR management... not the White. House.

2) because he was going to cause an international incident. But then he was not bared from his burning now was he? (Incidentally this is the only item on your list that actually involved the White House).

3) because he is a nut.

4) really, because the last I had heard that is exactly what was being investigated.

5) how were they misrepresented? I've seen the video of those protests as well, and the representation appropreate.

6) as have I... but I have seen no evidence that the White House gave the order to arrest people.

Close x
Don't Miss Out! |
Like us on Facebook?