Medical_marijuana

Drug Czar Wrong -- Medical Marijuana Value is Clear

Opinion by ASA
(July 24, 2009) in Society / Drug Law

Gil Kerlikowske, the Director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, the country’s new Drug Czar was in Fresno, California this week for Operation S.O.S. (Save Our Sierras). The multi-agency effort to eradicate marijuana in eastern Fresno County has nothing to do with medical marijuana. However, that did not stop Kerlikowske from declaring (erroneously) to the Fresno Bee that marijuana “has no medicinal benefit.”

Certainly, Kerlikowske should have limited his public comments to the (non-medical) marijuana being pursued by local and federal agents under Operation S.O.S. But, if he really felt compelled to stray from the issues of recreational marijuana enforcement to comment on the medicinal use of marijuana he should have at least done his homework.

With a simple Internet search, Kerlikowske would have learned that studies in the United States, backed up by countless studies around the world, have shown marijuana to have medical efficacy for a number of illnesses and chronic conditions. The Drug Czar appears to be abandoning a rational approach espoused at the time of his appointment by President Obama in favor of an approach more akin to his predecessor John Walters. Kerlikowske, like Walters, has blurred the lines between medical marijuana and marijuana used recreationally. They are not the same and should not be treated the same.

Instead of endangering the hundreds of thousands of medical marijuana patients in the United States and ignoring a mountain of medical evidence, Kerlikowske should draw a clear line between the two uses for marijuana. This would not only allow states to continue to pass sensible medical marijuana laws without fear of reprisal from the federal government, but it would also allow the federal government to adopt a much needed comprehensive policy that took into account the benefits of this promising medicine.

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Clay
    Budget accountability

    Our continued War on Drugs,and focus of our national resources towards the eradication of marijuana has to be justified and accounted for at the end of the day. All the budgets of the Federal organizations,the anti-drug cartel,depend on marijuana remaining illegal because over 1/2 their budgets are used to destroy and prosecute marijuana. If they back off marijuana,they would either lose part of their budget ,or have to implement increased enforcement
    of other targets and transfer their marijuana warriors into medicine cabinet searchers,where America's biggest drug threat is today.
    The Mexican cartels depend on the continued illegality of marijuana so they can continue making money ,and the anti-drug cartels depend on the same thing,for the same reason.

    - ClayUS July 24, 2009 2:20PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Clay
    Next prohibition target?

    With the last few increases in the price of tobacco products,there is now a black market for cigarettes in full swing now,so a pattern is starting ,and will continue,of a black market forming to provide a substance,although legal ,being sold at 1/2 the price of taxed cigarettes. And the providers are making money doing it.

    - ClayUS July 24, 2009 2:29PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • countryboy
      Tobacco next

      Your so right on that,I get email all the time for cheap smokes.

      - countryboyUS July 24, 2009 6:19PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • AB390
    Gil Kerlikowske is Wrong

    Gil Kerlikowske says marijuana has no medicinal benefits. The American College of Physicians begs to differ. Read their report at http://yes390.org/articles.html

    - AB390US July 24, 2009 6:31PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Clay
    Still Waiting

    Until the Attorney General clarifies the new medical marijuana policy
    no one knows the guidelines for medical marijuana or the uses the government recognizes. They have already announced that marijuana was a medicine so the czar is talking out of turn. Either they have convinced Eric Holder to hold up any clarification or they are having second thoughts about the announcement. Would not be surprised to hear the AG announce resuming busting medical marijuana clinics. There is that much money involved.

    - ClayUS July 25, 2009 4:56AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • AoMMC
    Education Request to Kerlikowske

    Thank you to the Americans for Safe Access for putting together this article. It is our belief that Director Kerlikowske simply needs to be educated on the benefits of medical marijuana . After he does so, it is possible that he could change his stance on the importance of medical marijuana for certain types of medical conditions .

    We can work together to share our views with Director Kerlikowske by sending an e-mail to www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov . It is possible that with the support of enough people, he may take the time to understand the importance of this form of medicine .

    We have sent the following e-mail to Director Kerlikowske:

    Dear Director Kerlikowske,

    We recently came across an article quoting you as declaring that marijuana has no medical benefit.

    We would like to respectfully ask that you take the time to review the following studies on the benefits of medical marijuana:

    http://www.cmcr.ucsd.edu/geninfo/research.htm

    http://www.cannabis-med.org/english/nav/home-science.htm

    Please note that these are just a sampling of the medical studies available for your review.

    There is a clear line between an individual that uses marijuana for medicinal use and an individual that is violating the law through illegal consumption. Patients who use marijuana for medicinal benefit are doing so because marijuana provides them a level of relief from suffering that traditional medicine does not. Medical marijuana patients are often in severe pain or chronically ill, and it makes it even more difficult for them when they are victims of discrimination in society . When people read an article quoting you as saying medical marijuana has no benefit, they will believe that medical marijuana patients are simply marijuana users and will label them as such. This assumption is incorrect, and will lead to misunderstanding and continuing discrimination.

    Please take the opportunity to review the medical studies available, if only to see the validity of the studies themselves. It is possible that after reading through the research, you may change your stance on the use of medical marijuana. If you were to do so, it would help the thousands of medical marijuana patients in society today to find a level of respect by their fellow citizens that they do not experience today.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Best regards,

    Association of Medical Marijuana Caregivers
    www.aommc.org

    - AoMMCUS July 26, 2009 5:00PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Herbalicious
    Drug Czar Required to OPPOSED the legalization of cannabis

    The Drug Czar and his office are required (by Congressional mandate) to OPPOSE any effort to legalize any schedule 1 substance, including cannabis , for ANY reason, including medical. See for yourself:

    According to Title VII Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998: H11225:

    Responsibilities. --The Director-- [...]

    [responsibility #12]: (12) shall ensure that no Federal funds appropriated to the Office of National Drug Control Policy shall be expended for any study or contract relating to the legalization (for a medical use or any other use) of a substance listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of a substance (in any form) that--

    1. is listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812); and
    2. has not been approved for use for medical purposes by the Food and Drug Administration;

    And that is the unfortunate reason he said what he said in Fresno and the reason Walters was an idiot and McCaffery was no better .If they don't lie, they don't have a comfy DC job anymore.

    Don't believe me?
    http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2007/10/09/theDrugCzarIsRequiredByLaw.html

    I really wish this would get mentioned a lot more so that people can start to understand why the highest drug office in this country says outrageous things about cannabis. Please tell everyone you know. I think this ONDCP Act is being renewed in Congress this year...with a push we can eradicate this nonsense for good.

    - HerbaliciousUS July 27, 2009 5:36AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Clay
      Whatever means available

      You forgot to mention that the mandate also requires them to refute any studies or data that supports legalization of marijuana for medical or any other reason. This would also include false studies to refute any studies that showed evidence supporting medical claims,or false data,including the pricing of street drugs,that would indicate that they were losing the war on drugs .

      - ClayUS July 27, 2009 4:02PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • rsteeb
    Weigh in [URL]

    http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/utilities/contact_form.html

    Please inform Director Kerlikowske that his recent remarks to the effect that cannabis ' Schedule I classification is valid are patently absurd. (Patent 6630507)

    As Judge Francis L Young observed it is arbitrary and capricious; as the Shafer commission* observed: To keep Cannabis illegal while tobacco and alcohol are dispensed freely is murderously stupid.

    Please advise "Doctor" Kerlikowske that *22 March 1972 was thirty seven years ago.

    As a glaucoma patient who has enjoyed the benefits of cannabis daily since 1968, I am damned tired of waiting for science to prevail over atrocious prevarication.

    Sincerely,

    Richard Paul Steeb
    San Jose California

    - rsteebUS July 28, 2009 10:47PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...